Samsung vows to strike back against Apple

“Samsung Electronics is moving to fight back against Apple by strengthening its partnerships with American mobile carriers to develop new technologies to get away from the U.S. firm’s claims on design,” Kim Yoo-chul reports for The Korea Times. “The world’s biggest smartphone maker is in talks with major telecom carriers on Apple’s home-turf such as Verizon Wireless about modified designs in Samsung Galaxy devices. It is also closely partnering with Microsoft (MS) to cut its dependency on Google Android, according to officials Wednesday.”

“On the legal front, its lawyers are making preparations to counter nearly every patent issue which nine jurors found in favor of Apple,” Yoo-chul reports. “Officials said Samsung has been preparing ‘all measures for all scenarios’ to fight Apple in 50 patent disputes in 10 different countries.”

Yoo-chul reports, “Earlier, Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Kun-hee granted full authority to Vice Chairman Choi Gee-sung to take charge of one of the biggest technology patent disputes in history… Lee was briefed about the details of the verdict by Choi, Tuesday. ‘The chairman calmed down and slightly closed his eyes after he was briefed. But he didn’t say anything further,’ another executive said. Choi, who is also the head of Samsung’s strategic planning office, wasn’t available for comment… Samsung confirmed that it will immediately sue Apple if the latter releases products using advanced long-term evolution (LTE) mobile technology. LTE has been emerging as the top standard in the global mobile industry.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: If you’re going to rattle your sabers, Samsung, it helps to have sabers to rattle. Utility patents aren’t going to cut it, slavish copier. FRAND.

Related articles:
Steve Jobs vindicated by Apple v. Samsung verdict – August 28, 2012
Samsung vows to fight Apple’s attempt to ban infringing smartphones in U.S. with ‘all necessary measures’ – August 28, 2012
Apple lists which Samsung products it will seek to ban from U.S. sale – August 27, 2012
Apple shares hit new all-time intraday and closing highs – August 27, 2012
Jefferies: Samsung verdict a ‘huge victory for Apple’; reiterates ‘Buy’ rating, $900 target price – August 27, 2012
Apple kicks Google’s Android in the teeth; $1.05 billion jury award may really be worth $450 billion – August 27, 2012
Samsung vows to keep fighting, calls U.S. verdict ‘regrettable’ – August 27, 2012
Tim Bajarin: Apple could eventually dump Samsung as a component supplier altogether – August 27, 2012
The Apple verdict and the challenge of innovation; It is easier to follow than lead – August 27, 2012
After Apple’s thermonuclear victory over Samsung, Google may be next – August 27, 2012
Some hope Apple’s sweeping patent victory against Samsung, Android is Pyrrhic – August 27, 2012
Samsung shares drop $12 billion after Apple’s court victory – August 27, 2012
Apple v. Samsung jury: Google email iced it for Apple – August 26, 2012
Tim Cook memo to Apple employees: Court victory over Samsung ‘is about values’ – August 26, 2012
Jury finds Samsung willfully violated Apple patents – August 24, 2012

62 Comments

      1. Remind me again how Apple did an EXACT copy of the Xerox GUI look, feel & design?

        Oh, that’s right..it didn’t look ANYTHING like what the MACOS turned out to be. Light years difference. and if I’m not mistaken, didn’t Jobs get a license/permission to use certain concepts?

        There is clearly a GULF of difference between a company (Apple) developing/improving upon a broad undeveloped concept (GUI–not even then yet on the mass market, much less on the radar of mass consumer consciousness) and outright STEALING of ideas (SAMSUNG+++) from a competitor who IS creating/innovating features & clearly leading the market w/ those features.

        Samsung basically took and iphone and COPIED it. Feature for feature. Element for element. Icon for icon. A sh@tty copy, granted, but nonetheless a copy..

        So no equivalency points here, Bat. In Korea & China the ‘swaping stealing borrowing’ of ideas & design is commonplace & accepted to the point of ridiculousness.

  1. Weren’t LTE & other standard essential patents already deemed exhausted w/ the chipmaker’s license when sold to the product manufacture. Someone please tell me how Samsung can continue to double dip on FRAND/SE licenses?

    1. i think there is custom software to write especially for VZW and Sprint to fall back to CDMA if no LTE.

      and i read when the original droid first came out google/moto had to write a lot of networking code to get android to work with CDMA that was outside the work of the radio chip

    2. You are not considering that this is largely about media perception and PR. Samsung can take advantage of the sad truth that most of today’s bloggers and media just repost whatever they see and do not have any knowledge or ability to analyze any of these statements, let alone the underlying technology and patens, on the merits.

      So Samsung can generally get away with just making statements in the media in order to affect the financial markets, because most investors, even professional, just go by what they see reported in the media.

      In the end, they CAN’T double dip on FRAND licenses, but that is irrelevant for what Samsung is trying to achieve right now by making these statements.

  2. So, Samsung blatantly copies Apple and rips off their products. Apple defends their design and utility patents in court and gets a successful verdict against the copying.
    Now Samsung is going to “strike back”?! What are they going to strike back from? They were the one who started the flagrant copying in the first place!

    I hate to say it, but Samsung is giving me a bad taste for ALL South Korean companies. I knew they all basically made knock-off products, but the shenanigans that Samsung is pulling are really turning me off to any of it.

    1. The Shamstung CEO is angry only at getting caught and his subordinates failing to stave off the Apple response and subsequent bad PR and stock hit. There is no morality at Samsung or high class standards, only profits obtained at any price. The “anger” is fake or faux outrage as if they have been wronged, when in reality they are been “righted” and called to the carpet for blatant infringement. Sadly they do not appear to understand the message. Apple is just another company to them to steamroll over in their ruthless way, but Apple is not to be trifled with and that scares them. Samsung products are on a permanent S**t List in our household. I don’t do business with companies so blatantly evil.

  3. Why don’t the dumb asses use the freaking money they will spend in a lawsuit to go do something really innovative? They are just supporting further one stereotype of Koreans by trying to act like tough, gang like Asian thugs who lack a moral compass. Disgusting.

    1. It takes time and costs a heck of a lot more money to be innovative than to rip off other companies like Apple.

      Also, Samsung has been ripping off others for so long, they do not have a clue *how* to be innovative. They are really terrible at it.

    2. Because if Samsung tries to innovate something, no one would buy it. They learned a long time ago that the best way to get people to buy something is to copy from the best.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.