Expert: Apple’s silence hurts its mystique, causes it to cede ‘cool’ factor to competitors

“Apple’s noted silence has hurt its mystique and caused it to cede the ‘cool’ factor to competitors, a communications expert said today,” Gregg Keizer reports for Computerworld. “‘It’s what Apple didn’t say that made them so powerful,’ said Peter LaMotte, an analyst with Levick, a Washington-based strategic communications consultancy. ‘They were so silent that it created an entire industry of rumor mongers.'”

“Now that silence hinders rather than helps Apple, LaMotte argued. ‘The Apple mystique protected them from a need to engage in the conversation. But the mystique has worn out. They used to own the ‘cool’ factor. Not anymore,'” Keizer reports. “LaMotte was reacting to comments made last month by Jean-Louis Gasse, a former top-level Apple executive, who said that Apple had ‘lost control of the narrative… [and] let others define its story.'”

Keizer reports, “Apple needs to ditch its longstanding reticence and get in the game, LaMotte said. ‘We will always recommend that it’s better to be in the conversation than not,’ he said. The way it is now, he continued, Apple’s letting others create the narrative. ‘If Apple’s not in the back seat, they’re in the passenger seat, and Samsung is driving the car,’ LaMotte said.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Hint, hint.

Related article:
Former Apple exec Jean-Louis Gassée: Apple needs to be more like Microsoft – March 18, 2013


    1. You mean except for last October, when Apple announced a plethora of new products, including new razor-thin iMacs, iPad mini, etc. etc.?

      Not every month can be Magical Product Month.

    2. Hey, I’ve got it.

      Maybe Tim Cook should do the Ballmer “Monkey Boy”dance while screaming “Developers, Developers, Developers” to kick off the upcoming Apple WWDC in June. Talk about starting a conversation!

  1. Garbage.

    Apple should be “in the conversation”, yet when citing Schiller’s gaffe about the S4, that’s not the “conversation” they should be involved in. What conversation, exactly, should Apple be engaged in, Mr. LaMotte? It seems like they’re screwed by being silent, which he’s saying was always part of Apple’s mystique (I take it he thinks it was a good thing), and they’re screwed when they pipe up because it sounds defensive. So which is it?

    “Even [Apple’s] ads, said LaMotte — himself a former ad executive — now take the wrong approach, sticking to products and their features.” Which is the way Apple has always toned its ads, even the “I’m a Mac” ads. It’s always been about what you could do with a Mac.

    So according to LaMotte, Apple shouldn’t be silent, shouldn’t speak out because it comes off as defensive, but should engage in ads it never has or “do something”.

    Fucking enlightening.

  2. Right… as if anyone (not on their payroll) views Samsung as “cool”.. not even hardcore Android fans.

    On the other hand the competition would sleep much better at night if Apple talked. That way they could react with their me-too announcement.

    I bet they live in fear of what Apple has lined up next.

  3. The only thing I want Apple talking about is the iPad 5 when Tim & Co. announce it on stage, proceeded by Jony Ive explaining it in a video where he says “aloomenium” at least two times.

    1. Ive would pronounce it “aluminium”, which is the correct way of pronouncing it as ratified by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) in 1990.

      Our American cousins are quite correct to use the -ize ending on certain words (much more logical than the British -ise) but their continued mispronunciation of aluminium is weird.

      Which is why we love ’em 🙂


  4. Perhaps the best question is why Mr LaMotte and his “Washington-based strategic communications consultancy” is being so forthcoming with this “information”.

    What’s his strategy in this?

Add Your Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.