Apple looks to license Google Gemini for iPhone, generative AI tools

Apple CEO Tim Cook
Apple CEO Tim Cook with the only vision he’ll ever have

Apple is in talks to build Google’s Gemini artificial intelligence engine into iPhone, iPad, and other platforms, Bloomberg News reports citing “people familiar with the situation.”

Mark Gurman for Bloomberg News:

The two companies are in active negotiations to let Apple license Gemini, Google’s set of generative AI models, to power some new features coming to the iPhone software this year, said the people… If a deal between Apple and Google comes to fruition, it would build upon the two companies’ search partnership. For years, Alphabet Inc.’s Google has paid Apple billions of dollars annually to make its search engine the default option in the Safari web browser on the iPhone and other devices.

A deal would give Gemini a key edge with billions of potential users. But it also may be a sign that Apple isn’t as far along with its AI efforts as some might have hoped — and threatens to draw further antitrust scrutiny of both companies.

Apple is preparing new capabilities as part of iOS 18 — the next version of the iPhone operating system — based on its own AI models. But those enhancements will be focused on features that operate on its devices, rather than ones delivered via the cloud. So Apple is seeking a partner to do the heavy lifting of generative AI, including functions for creating images and writing essays based on simple prompts.

Since early last year, Apple has been testing its own large language model — the technology behind generative AI — codenamed Ajax. Some employees also have been trying out a basic chatbot dubbed Apple GPT. But Apple’s technology remains inferior to tools from Google and other rivals, according to the people, making a partnership look like the better option.

Support MacDailyNews at no extra cost to you by using this link to shop at Amazon.

MacDailyNews Take: Apple having to deal with Google for its deeply flawed, literally racist AI is sad, yet totally predictable given the company’s laughably lost, scrambling, desperate-looking “leadership.” (In any event, Google should pay a huge amount annually to have generative AI access to Apple users. God only knows what this would do to Apple users’ privacy.)

Giving Google even more control is a ludicrous “solution” to Apple’s current quandary.

Apple pays and has been paying John Giannandrea, Senior Vice President of Machine Learning and AI Strategy, millions upon millions of dollars for years. WTF of any import does he really do? WTF of any import has he really delivered? Have you used Siri lately? Yup, it’s still a steaming pile of dogshit.

Where’s Apple’s generative AI, John? “Too hard; too late; look for partners; gimme my paycheck and stock options.” AAPL shareholders need to start asking real questions of these executives, especially those who are supposed in charge of Apple’s “AI Strategy,” when the company clearly has none. How about some accountability for once?

What we have here is a company that was once led by a visionary who set the agenda for entire industries, now led by [stuck with] a reactive caretaker who heard somewhere that VR headsets and electric cars were the next big things (probably read it in “Wired”), so that’s what he had Apple do, while completely missing artificial intelligence, especially generative AI, and now is scrambling to catch up to something Steve Jobs would have focused on long before anyone ever even heard of OpenAI.

Steve Jobs bought Siri in April 2010. Steve Jobs would never have ignored Siri, basically let it rot, for well over a decade and counting. Steve Jobs would have made Siri the first conversational generative AI assistant years before anyone else. And the company would today be worth at least a trillion dollars more than it is currently. (Yes, we’re lowballing that estimate.)MacDailyNews, February 28, 2024

Apple’s time a having a caretaker CEO to milk products and services conceived and created under Steve Jobs will, hopefully, draw to a close sooner than later.

See also:
• Work on Apple Vision Pro began under Steve Jobs – August 23, 2023
Contrary to popular belief, Steve Jobs knew about Apple Watch – February 13, 2023

With better management, Apple should be worth at least a trillion more than Microsoft currently. But, you can’t achieve those sort of results when you do things like miss transformative technologies like AI because you lack a visionary leader and have to resort to spending and scrambling madly trying to catch up to whatever you’ve blindly missed.MaDailyNews, January 12, 2024

The difference between an operations guy following a static playbook — reacting to events instead of determining them — versus a visionary genius becomes ever more apparent with each passing year.MacDailyNews, March 8, 2023

Let’s face it, Steve Jobs’ track record of picking Apple CEOs was less than stellar. – <a href=”https://macdailynews.com/2019/04/02/tim-cook-is-not-the-best-person-to-be-ceo-of-apple/>SteveJack, MacDailyNews, April 2, 2019

See also: Tim Cook is not the best person to be CEO of Apple – April 2, 2019

Please help support MacDailyNews. Click or tap here to support our independent tech blog. Thank you!

Support MacDailyNews at no extra cost to you by using this link to shop at Amazon.

12 Comments

  1. Google is evil and does evil. It’s time for Apple to fulfill Steve Jobs’s vision on going thermonuclear on Google. Google is a much bigger threat to America than TikTok will ever be.

    16
    3
  2. Of course Apple would partner with Google rather than one of the other LLMs. Google and Apple are partners in the “Cabal” to defeat Donald Trump as Time Magazine Referred to them through disinformaion and censorship.

    19
    3
  3. MDN take is spot on the money.

    It’s an embarrassment that after all his talk of “we got big things in AI” and all the money spent, all they got is licensing s**t google’s racist and dumb crap ChatGPT pile of crap. Insanity.

    Cook is John Sculley 2.0 with a bigger Iphone bankroll. He was meant to be a transitional CEO and he is well past the expiration date. He needs to be replaced with a real product visionary or at least someone with genuine enthusiasm for tech, and Craig Federici is probably the best choice other than Elon Musk.

    Apple needs a top chef, but all they have is a lousy cook.

    15
    2
  4. Making things look cooler won’t be enough to keep Apple on top this time. They’re really behind in the AI game. It’s kind of like when Bill Gates didn’t see how big the internet and searching online would get. Now, Apple’s in a spot where they have to use someone else’s AI tech instead of making their own cool stuff. And then there’s the question of money – how’s Apple going to benefit financially from all this? Think about when Apple and Google had to work together before, like the whole drama with Eric Schmidt. It shows that teaming up can be tricky, especially when you’re trying to catch up. You want to give Google their next Android again?

    10
    1
    1. It’s a cultural problem at Apple. They can’t throw billions at something and conjure up the type of dynamic, creative and flexible environment that can rapidly develop and iterate AI. They’re ossified in annual (or less frequent) update cycles. Releasing cool new features every week or month (without making money on them outside of hardware sales) is so far out of Apple’s comfort zone that they’re likely to have a panic attack.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.