Apple’s rebellion against the ‘Qualcomm Tax’

“The fact that Qualcomm Inc.’s business model has survived two decades is as much a marvel of modern lawyering as one of modern technology,” Tim Culpan writes for Bloomberg.

“That Qualcomm is the leading player in global mobile development is beyond doubt. What has irked authorities in China, South Korea, the U.S. and now Apple Inc. is what many see as the San Diego-based company’s strong-arm tactics in charging for that technology,” Culpan writes. “While Qualcomm designs and sells chips used in cellphones — Snapdragon being its most famous one — the real money comes from its huge portfolio of patents that offers up a complete system for wireless communications. Licensees pay for the technology, no matter how much of it they actually use or whether they even buy Qualcomm chips.”

“It’s a fantastic business model, one that Qualcomm is justifiably fighting to protect. While licensing accounts for only a third of revenue, behind the sale of chips, that business makes up almost three-quarters of its profit,” Culpan writes. “Qualcomm’s licensing model was simple. It charged a percentage of the total cost of all components in the phone. This approach had advantages for everyone involved. It meant licensees and Qualcomm didn’t have to scrap over which parts of the phone did or didn’t use Qualcomm technology, so they could just go ahead and focus on the more important task of developing and selling these hip new gadgets… Twenty years later, the industry has moved on. Qualcomm hasn’t. Displays, cameras, memory and even metal casings have become increasingly more expensive components of a phone, yet Qualcomm still expects to collect a ‘tax’ on all of it no matter how much it contributes.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Qualcomm’s ridiculous licensing scheme simply has to go! It’s unbelievable it’s still in effect in 2017!

Despite lawsuit, Qualcomm wants to keep doing business – January 24, 2017
Why Apple, the FTC, and others are attacking Qualcomm’s royalty model – January 24, 2017
Here are the most damning parts of Apple’s blockbuster lawsuit against Qualcomm – January 23, 2017
Apple’s legal assault on Qualcomm part of iPhone margin grab – January 23, 2017
Qualcomm says Apple’s claims are ‘baseless’ in response to Cupertino’s $1 billion lawsuit – January 21, 2017
Apple sues Qualcomm for $1 billion over onerous licensing practices – January 20, 2017
Qualcomm exec says FTC ‘rushed’ antitrust lawsuit before President-elect Trump’s inauguration – January 19, 2017
FTC alleges Qualcomm forced Apple into iPhone LTE chip deals – January 18, 2017
FTC charges Qualcomm with monopolizing key smartphone chip; alleges extracted exclusivity from Apple in exchange for reduced patent royalties – January 17, 2017
After eating Intel’s mobile lunch, Apple could next devour Qualcomm’s Baseband Processor business – January 20, 2015
Analyst: Apple’s going to dump Intel modems if they keep lagging Qualcomm – December 5, 2016
Yes, Apple is throttling download speeds for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus Verizon and Sprint versions – November 19, 2016
Apple’s modem choices may leave Verizon iPhone users feeling throttled – November 18, 2016
Tests show iPhone 7 Plus models with Qualcomm modem perform significantly better than those with Intel modem – October 20, 2016


  1. What the hell is up with the constant full page pop up ads with fake competitions and App Store redirects MDN?

    I don’t mind your ad-supported model in order to take advantage of your helpful Apple news consolidation but I don’t expect to be prevented from reading the stories by ads that take over my iPhone display EVEN AFTER FIVE REPEATS, ads that redirect me to buy stupid games and ads that turn off my music stream.

    If you want to be treated as a professional, curate your site and app professionally.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.