“We had AT&T in the 70s, IBM in the 80s, and the evil empire of the 90s was of course Microsoft and Bill ‘The Conqueror’ Gates,” Steve Tobak writes for FOXBusiness. “Today we have Google. Don’t let the geeky façade, whimsical multicolored logo and ‘don’t be evil’ mantra fool you. Google may very well be the most sinister threat and wicked incarnation of them all.”
“Hhow many lines does Google have to cross before its executives realize – before we realize – that they’re doing evil?” Tobak writes. “It’s easy to forget that Google once had a deep partnership with Apple. Then, while Steve Jobs mentored co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin and Schmidt sat on Apple’s board of directors, Android magically transformed from a BlackBerry-like phone with a physical keyboard into an iPhone clone. And all the while – right up until the Federal Trade Commission forced Schmidt off Apple’s board on anticompetitive concerns – he maintained that Android did not compete with iPhone. A year later, Apple’s iPad was immediately followed by Android tablets which I’m sure were not competitors either.”
“Last month the Wall Street Journal obtained a 160-page report from the [U.S. FTC] trade agency’s bureau of competition that recommended the commission bring an antitrust suit against the search giant. It claimed Google’s actions have done and will continue to do ‘real harm to consumers and to innovation in the online search and advertising markets,'” Tobak writes. “And yet, the agency’s commissioners ultimately decided against and closed the investigation. Why? Could it be that Google was the second-largest donor to President Obama’s reelection campaign or that the company’s executives spend so much time at the White House that the administration is thinking of redoing the Green Room in Google’s multicolor scheme?”
Read more in the full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: Do know evil.
How long until “Android Gear” magically grows hooks for Digital Crowns, Taptic Engines, and Force Touch displays?
From the earliest days at Apple, I realized that we thrived when we created intellectual property. If people copied or stole our software, we’d be out of business. If it weren’t protected, there’d be no incentive for us to make new software or product designs. If protection of intellectual property begins to disappear, creative companies will disappear or never get started. But there’s a simpler reason: It’s wrong to steal. It hurts other people. And it hurts your own character. – Steve Jobs
Here’s what Google’s Android looked like before and after Apple’s iPhone:
UBS: Billions at stake for Google on Apple default search deal – March 3, 2015
Poor man’s iPhone: Android on the decline – February 26, 2015
Study: iPhone users are smarter and richer than those who settle for Android phones – January 22, 2015
Why Android users can’t have the nicest things – January 5, 2015
iPhone users earn significantly more than those who settle for Android phones – October 8, 2014
Yet more proof that Android is for poor people – June 27, 2014
More proof that Android is for poor people – May 13, 2014
Android users poorer, shorter, unhealthier, less educated, far less charitable than Apple iPhone users – November 13, 2013
IDC data shows two thirds of Android’s 81% smartphone share are cheap junk phones – November 13, 2013
CIRP: Apple iPhone users are younger, richer, and better educated than those who settle for Samsung knockoff phones – August 19, 2013
iPhone users smarter, richer than Android phone users – August 16, 2011
Study: Apple iPhone users richer, younger, more productive than other so-called ‘smartphone’ users – June 12, 2009