Google’s Moto X no ‘iPhone killer,’ say reviewers

“Motorola’s ‘Moto X,’ the cellphone maker’s first flagship device since Google bought the company in 2012, stands out in a crowded market due to its customizable colors and materials, yet stops short of being an ‘iPhone killer,’ reviewers said,” Reuters reports.

“Moto X is Motorola’s latest attempt to break into a smartphone market dominated by Apple Inc and Samsung Electronics,” Reuters reports. “Reviews published in the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times newspapers late Tuesday praised the phone’s customizable colors and materials, but said its other features were not game changing.”

Reuters reports, “Walter Mossberg wrote in the Wall Street Journal that ‘Moto X is an innovative phone, not a revolutionary one. But it may point toward a more revolutionary future… But I wouldn’t call the Moto X a game-changer, like the original iPhone was in 2007,’ he wrote.”

Read more in the full article here.

Related articles:
Moto X: ‘If this is the best product that Google can come up with, it has failed’ – August 6, 2013
Google’s Moto X pricing mistake – August 2, 2013
Piper: New Moto X won’t draw consumers from Apple’s iPhone – August 2, 2013
Google’s ‘Moto X’ enters crowded smartphone market – August 1, 2013

J.D. Power: Apple ranks highest in smartphone customer satisfaction for 9th consecutive time – March 21, 2013
J.D. Power: Apple iPad ranks highest in tablet customer satisfaction – September 13, 2012

Yankee Group: iPhone ownership in the U.S. will top Android by 2015 – April 26, 2013
Yankee Group: Apple continues to eat Samsung’s lunch; customer loyalty will drive iPhone ownership past Android’s peak – April 26, 2013
Apple’s iPhone user gains again out-pace Android in the U.S. – April 5, 2013
Why Apple’s new iPhone can’t lose; as with all iPhones, next-gen likely to become best-selling smartphone of all time – April 4, 2013
Apple increases lead over Samsung, gains on Google’s Android in U.S. smartphone market share – April 4, 2013
Yankee Group: Apple to gain additional U.S. smartphone share over Samsung in 2013 – March 20, 2013
With 78% share, Apple’s iOS tightening its grip on the enterprise and taking share from Android – March 8, 2013
Apple rules the skies with 84% in-flight share vs. Android’s 16% – March 7, 2013
Apple iPad continues domination with over 80% usage share in U.S. and Canada – March 7, 2013
comScore: Google’s Android, Samsung continue to lose U.S. share to Apple’s iOS, iPhone – March 6, 2013
World’s best-selling smartphone: Apple iPhone 5; iPhone 4S #2, third place Samsung Galaxy 3 brings up rear – February 20, 2013
Apple iOS dominates mobile video viewing with 60% share vs. Android’s 32% – February 13, 2013
Android’s Web share down 13% since November; Apple’s iOS now over 60% – February 1, 2013
Android’s unit share growth has not hurt Apple’s profit share – February 26, 2013
Apple iOS dominates mobile video viewing with 60% share vs. Android’s 32% – February 13, 2013
Android’s Web share down 13% since November; Apple’s iOS now over 60% – February 1, 2013

14 Comments

    1. How long has it been since Google bought Motorola and started the development of their “flagship” Android smartphone? A year? And this is the best that they can deliver even leveraging past Motorola smartphone designs?

      Google is the company who should be blasted for not being innovative. At least Apple has a track record of true market innovation with real, not beta, products. Rather than the “what have you done for me lately” that plagues Apple, Google should be asked, “what have you done for me at all?”

  1. If the best thing that can be said about the MotoX phone is its customizable colors, then that implies the device is at best a shiny new toy: the same criticism that opponents of Apple have said about its products for years. Guess the shoe’s on the other foot now, but interestingly noone seems to notice this.

    This also seems to imply the Purchasing Public is unable to discern the difference between a quality device and a cheaply-made one, which is a prematurely dismissive observation, because a lot of people may be deceived through misleading marketing tactics when making their next cellphone purchase.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.