U.S. appeals court to consider Apple’s request to delay e-books trial

“A U.S. appeals court will consider Apple Inc’s request to put off a trial scheduled for July to determine how much the iPad maker must pay in damages to customers in more than two dozen states over e-book price fixing,” Jonathan Stempel and Joseph Ax report for Reuters.

“The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said in a brief order on Friday that a three-judge panel will hear Apple’s argument on why the trial should be put on hold while it appeals a judge’s ruling that it conspired with five publishers to raise e-book prices,” Stempel and Ax report. “The judge, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in New York, had denied Apple’s request to postpone the trial on Wednesday.”

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Arline M.” for the heads up.]

Related articles:
In pretrial view, judge says leaning toward U.S. DOJ over Apple in e-books case – May 24, 2013
Lawyers have complained for years that Judge Denise Cote pre-judges cases before she enters the courtroom – August 14, 2013

U.S. Federal Puppet Denise Cote: Apple cannot escape U.S. states’ e-book antitrust cases – April 15, 2014
U.S. Federal Puppet Denise Cote: ‘Apple’s reaction to the existence of a monitorship underscores the wisdom of its imposition’ – January 16, 2014
Judge Denise Cote denies Apple request block her friend as ‘antitrust compliance monitor’ – January 13, 2014
Antitrust monitor Bromwich rebuts Apple accusations of ‘unconstitutional’ investigation – December 31, 2013
Apple seeks to freeze its U.S. e-books ‘antitrust monitor’ – December 15, 2013
The persecution of Apple: Is the U.S. government’s ebook investigation out of control? – December 10, 2013
Apple’s Star Chamber: An abusive judge and her prosecutor friend besiege the tech maker – December 5, 2013
Apple takes aim not just at court-ordered e-books monitor, but also at U.S. District Judge Denise Cote herself – December 2, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Judge Denise Cote assigns DOJ monitor in Apple ebook price-fixing case – October 17, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Judge issues injunction against Apple in ebooks antitrust case; largely in line with what DOJ wanted – September 6, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Judge Denise Cote says Apple needs third-party supervision after ‘blatant’ ebook price fixing – August 28, 2013


  1. Bend over judge cote, this is a preview of what you got coming!

    After you get overturned on this one, the next one will be with no vaseline and then… Look out for being exposed, sued and disbarred you low life bitch.

  2. Just what kind of fscked-up legal system goes ahead to decide on what the fines are going to be before the appeals process has even started?
    Surely once all appeals have been gone through, and the guilty verdict has been upheld, a fine can then be decided on?

    1. The appeals of the liability judgment could take years. So could the appeals of the damages. Unless the processes can be run in parallel, it could easily be a decade between the alleged violation and a final judgment for damages. In this case, a delay might help Apple, but what about the Samsung cases? Should Apple have to wait into the 2020s to collect its damages? Justice delayed is justice denied, no matter whose ox is being gored.

  3. The legal threats to Apple Inc., not to mention the insane U.S. tax law, plus the federal attacks on various large U.S. corporations which amount to nothing but ill-disguised blackmail, will lead to companies incorporating anywhere but the U.S. and lead to the inevitable decline of the U.S. economy.
    Building a circular corporate HQ in California is definitely trendy, but it suggests permanent location for Apple Inc. in the United States, which is why the company can be plundered at will by the federal government, the courts and the states of the union. Not a pleasant outlook for shareholders.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.