“Judge Richard Posner, the Seventh Circuit judge sitting by designation on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to preside over an Apple v. Motorola lawsuit, tentatively dismissed the litigation last week because the parties weren’t able to prove their entitlement to remedies, but he pointed out (as did I in my reporting, unlike many others who wrote about the same thing) that he had not made up his mind on a definitive basis,” Florian Mueller reports for FOSS Patents.
“And indeed, Judge Posner has now granted Apple’s request for an injunction hearing, which will take place next Wednesday at 10 AM local Chicago time… As I explained in my previous blog post on this case, injunctions are an equitable remedy and, therefore, decided by judges, not juries.,” Mueller reports. “The order points out that Motorola may also seek an injunction over the 3G-essential patent it still has in play in this litigation, but will have to ‘address the bearing of FRAND on the injunction analysis.'”
Read more in the full article here.
Judges are appointed for a lifetime?
Federal judges are. State judges usually not – typically they are elected for a number of years, but I think there are some states where the position is for life for certain courts.
Yay Judge Posner! Judge Koh: Please pay attention and not be dragged down by your S. Korean maters.
Motorola sales after injunction: 0
Motorola sales without injunction: 1,000 units
Motorola net savings from shipping, storing and subsequent restocking of 50,000 units in the channel: $2 million.
Motorola should hope the injunction happens.
Well DUH judge! Thank you for being brave enough to correct your error.