J.D. Power: Apple ranks highest in smartphone customer satisfaction for 6th consecutive time

Overall satisfaction with smartphones and traditional mobile phones is considerably higher for devices that are a specific size and weight and are equipped with the latest technological advancements, such as high-quality display screens, faster processing speeds, longer battery life and touch screen capabilities, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2011 U.S. Wireless Smartphone Customer Satisfaction StudySM—Volume 2 and the J.D. Power and Associates 2011 U.S. Wireless Traditional Mobile Phone Satisfaction StudySM—Volume 2, both released today.

Satisfaction with both smartphones and traditional or “feature” phones is greatly impacted by the physical design and dimensions of the device. For example, satisfaction ratings are highest (8.1 on a 10-point scale) when the weight of the smartphone device does not exceed 5 ounces. In comparison, satisfaction averages 7.6 for smartphone devices that are 5 ounces or heavier. The same scenario holds true for feature phones, for which satisfaction with the weight of the device peaks between 3 and 3.5 ounces, and drops considerably when the feature phone weighs 4 ounces or more.

The width and thickness of the smartphone device are also critical in maximizing the ownership experience, and echo the old adage that “thinner is better” holds true. Overall physical design satisfaction is highest (852 on a 1,000-point scale) for smartphones that are less than 0.45 inches wide. In comparison, satisfaction averages 783 for smartphones that are 0.65 inches wide or wider.

Technology advancements also impact the experience of mobile devices in a number of areas. For example, touch screen-only smartphones generate considerably higher satisfaction with ease of operation (817 points) than either QWERTY-only based devices or those that have both a touch screen and QWERTY functions (785 and 782 points, respectively).

In addition, faster processing speeds, higher computer chip bit rates and the most advanced display screens (such as Super AMOLED vs. older LCD-based screens) all add significantly to user satisfaction. Even the number of megapixels found in camera-enabled mobile devices influences the ownership experience. In general, the higher the number of megapixels, the higher the satisfaction with camera picture and video quality. However, devices with at least 5 megapixels achieve nearly as high a satisfaction score as those smartphones with 8 megapixels or more.

“It’s not unexpected that satisfaction is higher for devices that have new technological advances or features,” said Kirk Parsons, senior director of wireless services at J.D. Power and Associates. “Having the right combination of physical dimensions and operating functions and features for both smartphones and traditionally equipped devices is key to creating an exceptional ownership experience with each type of wireless device.”

These two studies have been updated to measure customer satisfaction with traditional wireless handsets and smartphones among owners who have used their current mobile phone for less than one year by examining several key factors. In order of importance, the key factors of overall satisfaction with traditional wireless handsets are: performance (31%); ease of operation (24%); physical design (24%); and features (20%). For smartphones, the key factors are: performance (35%); ease of operation (24%); features (21%); and physical design (20%).

For a sixth consecutive time, Apple ranks highest among manufacturers of smartphones in customer satisfaction. Apple achieves a score of 838 and performs well in all factors, particularly in ease of operation and features.

JD Power 2011 Wireless Consumer Smartphone Customer Satisfaction Study

MacDailyNews Take: Total domination.

The studies also find the following key wireless handset usage patterns:

• The price of a traditional wireless mobile phone continues to decline and averages $71 in 2011, compared with an average of $81 at the beginning of 2009. The decline is primarily due to discounts provided by handset providers and wireless service carriers to incentivize sales. Currently, 42 percent of owners report having received a free mobile phone when subscribing to a wireless service.

• Mobile applications continue to enhance the smartphone user experience. More than two-thirds of owners say they have downloaded games and social networking applications to their device. More than one-half (54%) say they have downloaded entertainment-oriented applications, while 52 percent indicate having downloaded travel software, such as maps and weather applications. This indicates that smartphone owners are continuing to integrate their device usage into both their business and personal lives.

• Customers are highly satisfied with 4G-capable devices. Satisfaction among customers using 4G-capable phones averages 819, compared with 786 among customers using phones with 3G capability. Owners of 4G devices are also more active in terms of calling, texting and browsing the Internet.

The 2011 U.S. Wireless Smartphone Customer Satisfaction Study—Volume 2 and the 2011 U.S. Wireless Traditional Mobile Phone Satisfaction Study—Volume 2 are based on experiences reported by 6,898 smartphone owners and 8,775 traditional mobile phone owners. Both studies were fielded between January and June 2011.

Source: J.D. Power and Associates
 

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Dan K.” for the heads up.]

14 Comments

  1. Still have only seen 1 Android phone in the wild, among the thousands of iPhones I ave seen in th last 6 months.

    Ironically, the guy who was fiddling with his Android also ad an iPhone in his other hand.

    So Googles numbers must be fake!

    1. @Eldernorm, read the article. Consumers were happier with 4G than with 3G (which surprised me). They were happier with 8 megapixel cameras – which the iPhone does not have – than with the 5 megapixel cameras. This survey wasn’t tailored to the iPhone. Please keep your unfounded conspiracy theories to yourself.

      1. @FalKirk,
        Sorry if I upset you. 🙁 But I was commenting on how they broke out the parts of a phone. No I did not read the whole article, but going by MDN parts, its like do you like this donut? but never asking about the donut as a whole (no pun intended) but rather the size of the hole, the shape of the hole, the shape of the body of the donut, the density of the donut material, bla, bla, bla.

        When I buy a phone or donut, I look at all the parts together, not just pick on specs. And that is what it sounds like this survey did…. reduce an iPhone to a series of just specs.

        Hey its friday, Have a great weekend. 🙂
        en

      2. PS. Yes I would be happier with a great 4G connection vs 3G, but if I have an intermitt or missing 4G vs a great 3G+ (Dallas), Yes I like a 4G better but I do not have it so its a non issue.

        Just a clarification

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.