iKey: Apple looks to reinvent the key

Mac Sale  FREE ShippingApple, “the computer giant which manufactures the iPod and iPhone, has plans to replace the traditional door key with a hi-tech alternative,” Richard Gray reports for The Telegraph. “It is developing technology, already being nicknamed the “iKey”, which will mean that rather than carrying around a bunch of keys, people will be able to use a single electronic device to unlock their car, front door and gain access to their office.”

“Users would simply have to enter a pin code and wave the device over an electronic pad fitted beside a door to open it,” Gray reports. “The technology is revealed in a newly published patent application, which has generated speculation that the next model of the iPhone will contain this feature.”

“The iKey uses a similar principal to the technology employed by card access entry systems commonly used in many workplaces and the Oyster Card, used on public transport in London. Car manufacturers, including Mercedes, Lexus and Toyota, are also starting to use such keyless entry systems for their vehicles through key fobs,” Gray reports. “According to the patent, Apple hopes to replace these cards and keyfobs by allowing the iPhone to be used instead to unlock doors to buildings and cars.”

Gray reports, “The iKey technology will take Apple one step further towards creating a ubiquitous mobile device that is the only thing people need to carry in their pockets… eander Kahney, a consumer technology expert and author of a book and blog called the Cult of Mac, said there were strong rumours that Apple had already been testing the technology and it could lead to the company even trying to replace consumers’ wallets.”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Makes perfect sense, especially if you want to minimize scratching your iPhone in your pocket. We can see Apple’s slogan already: “No keys, no coins, no scratches.”

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Dirty Pierre le Punk” for the heads up.]

37 Comments

  1. @Tommy Boy? Are you worried about your Apple controlled house doing the same thing? That said how do you get in your house if the power’s out? Or your car if you have a dead battery?

  2. I hope that the iKey is orders of magnitude more secure than Mifare’s Classic RFID chip, as used in the Oyster card et al, which has been proven to be fairly easily hackable.

    I’ll stick my traditional keys, thank you very much ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”grin” style=”border:0;” />

    =:~)

  3. It’s cool!! Imagine that you are far from home and some firend ask you to borrow your car and you say “Yes, let me send you the KEY”.
    You sent a temporal passcode programed for 1 or 2 days to his iphone to unlock and use the car.

    Or simply have a water prof iphone to unlock all your doors.

  4. I was just about to respond to Tommy Boy, but it appears that his comment has been vaporized by the MDN Borg Collective.

    The thing is, the “issues” around Toyota are not really issues at all.

    No one (inlcluding MIT and Stanford Universities) has been able to reproduce the reported accelerator problems, and there have only been six reported issues to date.

    No doubt, these six issues stemmed from user error, and mass histeria.

    This mess that Toyota is in, is in fact, nothing more than a consequence of the current administration’s knee-jerk, act-before-thinking finger-pointing agenda.

    Let’s see, the government invests heavily in GM, and then mandates a recall, costing Toyota sales and customer loyalty; the same company that also happened to be GM’s biggest threat.

    Does anyone else smell a conpsiracy? If there ever was one to believe in, this is it.

  5. John Gee: And when your battery dies, no entry.

    That’s why I don’t drive any car newer than a 1936 with a four-cylinder engine. If the battery dies in any newer car, you can’t crank it by hand.

  6. This has more to do with making purchases with an iPod or iPhone instead of cash or credit cards. Apple already has hundreds of million active iTunes accounts. The device will act as a secure two way RFID. All the micropayments will then be totted up for the month and your account will then be debited.

  7. @Metryq

    Tell that to OnStar that can turn off a car’s ignition at will and can listen to every word spoken, whether there’s a subscription to it or not and whether it’s on or off.

  8. @ TheConfused1
    “This mess that Toyota is in, is in fact, nothing more than a consequence of the current administration’s knee-jerk, act-before-thinking finger-pointing agenda.”

    Uh, no. The mess that Toyota is in is a consequence of the deplorable state the US auto industry finds itself in, caused by their own lack of foresight and innovation, regardless of who holds the stock. This is a trade war, pure and simple, ignited by the fact that no one bought an American car with their Clunker Cash, they all bought Toyotas. It’s a bit of a giveaway when auto industry CEOs are sitting right behind lawmakers as Akio Toyoda testifies about what naughty scum-sucking jerk he’s been.
    All this finds a willing audience among corporate accomplices in the media who are willing to hump a few freak cases into an all-out recallocalypse. You can bet that it won’t be long before a Hyundai full of nuns is rendered charcoal by a sticky cigarette lighter, or a Kia containing innocent rotarians bursts into flames outside some church.

    This isn’t over.

  9. Why does an idea like this bring out such nutbag responses?
    There’s a simple compromise. Have BOTH. Use the electronic lock for day to day stuff, and the key lock for long term outages, like vacations. Most current electronic locks have a manual backup as well.

    Remember, the Illuminati WANT you to be a Luddite!

  10. I’ll stick my traditional keys, thank you very much

    @Chas,

    Yeah, because traditional keys are SO secure. Nobody ever picks or bumps the lock, or copies or loses the keys. ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”rolleyes” style=”border:0;” />

    I love how whenever some new technology arrives to replace an older technology, everybody always points out the flaws in the new technology and completely ignores all the (obvious) problems with the old technology.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.