Apple, Dell and Sony added to Bluetooth patent lawsuit

Apple Store“Apple Inc., Dell Inc., Sony Corp. and five other technology companies were added to a lawsuit over patents covering Bluetooth, threatening their use of a wireless- communication standard that’s in millions of devices,” Jeff St.Onge and Connie Guglielmo report for Bloomberg.

“The nonprofit Washington Research Foundation sued Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Samsung Electronics Co. and Nokia Oyj over Bluetooth in Seattle federal court in December. Apple, Dell and Sony were added as defendants March 15, along with Logitech International SA, Motorola Inc., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Toshiba Corp. and Plantronics Inc., court papers show,” St.Onge and Guglielmo report.

St.Onge and Guglielmo report, “The suit threatens the ability of the computer and device makers to deliver wireless capabilities to customers. The companies are accused of infringing four patents covering technology that lets users exchange data among mobile phones, personal computers and other devices without using cables.”

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Michael P.” for the heads up.]

44 Comments

  1. The article says that “Bluetooth was invented by an Ericsson AB engineer in the 1990s and developed by Ericsson, Intel Corp., International Business Machines Corp. and Nokia, according to the Bluetooth Special Interest Group, composed of more than 6,000 companies. Sony Ericsson is a joint venture between Sweden’s Ericsson AB and Japan’s Sony.”

    Yet many of those firms are named in the suit. What is the relationship betweeen the non-profit firm and those that invented it? And what about the other 6,000 firms in the special-interest group?

    And why add names later not in the original suit?

  2. Bluetooth will simply disappear if this lawsuit is upheld and it becomes too costly or too much trouble for Apple and the other companies. Bluetooth isn’t that great, anyway, and you will see that niche filled in a hurry if Bluetooth becomes non-viable.

  3. Washington Research Foundation is in Seattle, WA. Ring any bells? Boardmember C. Kent Carlson
    is a partner in the law firm Preston, Gates & Ellis. Does “Gates” ring a bell?

    The “Gates” in the firm’s name is William H. Gates, Sr., father of Microsoft founder Bill Gates.

    Preston Gates & Ellis, LLP, also known as Preston Gates, is a law firm with offices in the United States, China and Taiwan. Its main office is in the IDX Tower in Seattle, Washington. Preston Gates is ranked among the top 100 law firms in the United States by both The American Lawyer magazine and the National Law Journal, and has traditionally been considered, along with Perkins Coie, one of the two leading Seattle-based law and lobbying firms.

    Is Microsoft a named defendant? Are you beginning to connect the dots?

  4. @seedavenkc

    If you read a little closer you will find that CSR Plc., the british firm who manufacturer’s bluetooth chips, may have incorporated unlicensed patents into their chips which were subsequently sold to those named in the suit. It should be easy enough to determine whether this case has merit. Examine the chips.

    If the case has merit, are those named in the suit liable to any greater extent than CSR? Perhaps. But only if due diligence is required by the defendants named in the suit to properly test the veracity of CSR’s claims of patent ownership PRIOR to buying and installing the chips into their products.

    Those named in the suit probably went with CSR’s chips because they were cheaper. The other name-brand bluetooth chip manufacturer Broadcom, fully licensed the patents in question and while probably charges more as a result, has a vested interest in this case.

  5. Mr. Reese: Gee, and I thought that extortion was illegal.
    Silly me.

    The RIAA patented extortion. The “the non-profit foundation” received a letter from the RIAA offering to cut its penalty for using extortion without its permission, from $10 million to $6 million, if it can share of the Bluetooth profits.

  6. Another interesting connection between WRF and Microsoft, is their affiliate association with Technology Alliance whose chairman Marty Smith is a retired partner with Preston Gates & Ellis. He has advised Microsoft for over 23 years in intellectual property rights and computer law.

    Technology Alliance is having a luncheon in May and guess who the guest speaker will be? None other than the chair-throwing monkeyboy himself.

  7. i feel sick… is that all that is left in the tank for the .com tech boom of the 90’s? Chasing down old patents for “lost” income on “patented” ideas? Gimme a bloody break here, where’s my old PC? I feel like vomitting on the mobo and claiming some kind of Darwin award.

    PS. I hate the upper echelon world of business. A hundred times worse than politics (just look at the stock exchange).

  8. “i didn’t think anything of it until I started looking at my headers in email and noticed that ANY email I sent out included my computer’s shortname (ie: my WHOLE ENTIRE NAME) in the actual header”

    Funny. I just emailed myself and checked the headers on the received email. I don’t see MY short name anywhere in the headers. I do see my email address several times though. Your email address wouldn’t possibly include your shortname in it, would it?

    AppleGuy

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.