eWeek: ‘25 Killer Apps of All Time’

eWeek’s Peter Coffee has compiled his idea of the “25 Killer Apps of All Time, seen below in chronological order.

Peter Coffee’s 25 Killer Apps of All Time:
1976: Electric Pencil
1978: WordStar
1979: VisiCalc
1981: dBase II
1982: AutoCAD
1983: Lotus 1-2-3
1983: Turbo Pascal
1984: MacWrite/MacPaint
1984: MultiMate
1985: Excel for Macintosh
1985: Aldus PageMaker
1986: Cross-network E-mail
1987: Excel for Windows
1987: dBase Mac
1988: Mathematica 1.0
1989: Word for Windows
1990: Windows 3.0
1990: Adobe Photoshop
1991: Microsoft Visual Basic
1994: Netscape Navigator 1.0
1995: Internet Explorer 1.0
1996: Palm HotSync
2001: Mac OS X
2001: Apple iTunes
2004: Mozilla Firefox 1.0

Read about and see screenhots of each application in the full article here.

42 Comments

  1. Forgot AppleWorks for the Apple II (not directly related to the Mac’s AppleWorks). It was the “killer app” for the platform that started it all…

    [And Windows 95 should be there instead of Windows 3.0 (which was terrible and “non-killer”)].

  2. “And Windows 95 should be there instead of Windows 3.0 (which was terrible and “non-killer”

    think 3.0 is listed as a ‘Killer App’ because of what it replaced. After all Spam is a ‘killer food’ if your starving to death.

  3. If Windows 3.0 was a “killer app”, then they made a huge mistake by not including any Mac OS that came with the original Mac. My first Mac had OS 4 on it, and was purchased in October of 1984. I don’t know if OS 1, 2 or 3 made it to general release, so I don’t know if they should be included there. But to include the original Windows without including the original Mac OS is just wrong!

  4. Wow, Electric Pencil. I learned to write Basic programs while using Electric Pencil on my hand-wire-wrapped
    S100, 8080, 64K, CPM box I made for myself back in 1977. Memories….8^)

    MDN word: “getting” as in getting old 8^(

  5. On the right side of the page:
    Microsoft’s Vista has widely inspired the “Why do I need that?” question, which past “killer applications” have answered in different ways for different platforms during three decades of personal computing.

    Too many sreadsheets and browsers on the list. How about Toast, ffmpeg, Illustrator…. Vista falls into the category of “soft-serve.”
    {{{ Emit raspberry sound here }}}

  6. Rasterbator,

    It was because of my exposure to Mosaic that I develop web sites today. Remember what happened when you would load a page that had graphics? If you were on a Mac, JPEGView would launch. My first time ever using that program floored me, especially after having to use telnet and gopher to go through information at other universities.

  7. very conservative with a geeky bent…
    calculator/math programs didn’t change or revolutionize the world
    because they only replaced calculators… for the vast majority calculators worked just fine their needs…

    how about bit torrent or even napster which changed the the very nature
    of content distribution and made digital content the de facto standard…
    bringing the whole music industry to its knees as the world opted to become pirates rather than deal with the crack dealer labels for their “fix”.

    how about pro tools which obsoleted a whole sector of high end recording equipment and put a recording studio into every musicians hands so they didn’t have to sell their souls for recording time… the same for programs that made everyone a graphic designer/photographer…

    sure the early programs were stepping stones and foundations which led to the powerful programs of today but they weren’t “killer” apps because their steep learning curves caused as many problems as they solved designed by and for the nerds rather than common people… just think what a nightmare search engines were before google… yes they were useful but they were also a pain in the ass, so much so that they weren’t vital to the world.

  8. Killer Apps, are by nature, first — and responsible for breaking new ground and creating a new digital market or industry

    Of course, the Mac’s original System OS of 1984 ushered in the era of a graphical computer interface put to successful use in a mass market product and predated Windows, which was a derivative of Apple’s work. So, Apple’s System OS (v4?) from the original Mac should have been on the list, not Windows 3.0. Knowlegdeable historians know that a Silicon Valley Xerox research center developed the concept of a graphic interface for computers, but Xerox never put the idea to use in a groundbreaking product. Steve Jobs’ crew at Apple connected the dots and created a real (and successful) product. Microsoft has been copying Apple’s Mac products since the very beginning, just as it does today.

    QuarkXPress also was derived from Aldus PageMaker, which (along with the Mac and the Apple LaserWriter printer), created the desktop publishing revolution. While Quark deserves credit for making vast improvements over PageMaker, it was not a first, and thus not a Killer App.

  9. I’m not sure you have that completely right Geo. A Killer app is, by definition, a killer of something. And I suppose what a Killer ap is killing is what it is competing against – whether it’s a digital competitor, a real world one, or both. It doesn’t always follow that the first ap of a type (ie the ground-breaking one) is the one that does the killing – it’s often the case that the second or third ap of a type are the successful ones which kill off (or severely restrict) what it was made to replace. A very good case in point is the Mac OS – which was the first of its type, and may well be the best of its type… but the ‘Killer ap’ here is without any doubt Windows.

  10. And of course, what about:

    Bars and Pipes – So big that M$ bought it just to shut it down!
    DreamWeaver
    Final Cut Pro – Definately a killer app, just ask Avid.
    After Effects
    ImageFX
    QT – changed everything when it first arrived!

    and……

    Microsoft Bob

  11. I think before you can do a list you need to define what “killer app” actually is.

    Wiki has this definition:

    A killer application is a computer program that is so useful or desirable that it proves the value of some underlying technology, such as a gaming console, operating system, or piece of computer hardware.

    Using this definition here are a few of my suggestions:

    Deluxe Paint for the Amiga Proved computers could be used for graphic arts and design. MacPaint came later and Photoshop after that.
    Caligari for the Amiga Proved that 3D Modeling was cost effective and relatively straight forward to perform on the desktop.
    Adobe Premier 1 Launched the desktop NLE paradigm (As much as I loved the Amiga, The Video Toaster was not an NLE solution). iMovie is not a killer app inasmuch as Premier had already proved that video could be done effectively on the desktop.

    Also, by this definition, you can’t really have the same app for different platforms be killer apps. Word and Excel popularized word processing and spreadsheet development on the desktop but popularization is not the same as proving the value of the underlying technology. So Wordstar and Lotus 1-2-3 make sense but not any of the Office products.

    Therefore, there should only be, on the list, one spreadsheet program, one word processor, one video editor, one graphics program, one 3D modeler, one jukebox, and so on.

    Just my 2 cents worth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.