Forbes: Microsoft’s Vista slips again – Steve Jobs must be waking up a happy man this morning

“The new version of Microsoft Windows, called Vista, has slipped again. It was originally going to ship in 2003. Then 2005. Then 2006. Now in early 2007. I’m not surprised, having seen a demo of Microsoft’s new programs at an ‘event’ for tech buyers in New York last week,” Daniel Lyons writes for Forbes. “The new programs are phenomenally complex, with scores of buttons and pull-down menus and myriad connections among various applications… Meanwhile, 500 tech buyers sat there in the dark, their eyes glazing over from the sheer mind-numbing pointlessness of most of this stuff. The audience laughed out loud when the Microsoft guy showed off a kludgey system that lets you fetch Outlook e-mail messages using voice commands from a cell phone.”

“Even more ironic is that Microsoft has ginned up a new slogan, ‘People Ready,’ which apparently is meant to describe its software, or maybe it describes companies that use its software, or whatever. Who knows? It’s one of those phrases that means anything, and so means nothing,” Lyons writes. “Who makes this stuff up? Do they actually pay this person? And is Microsoft just figuring out now that its programs are used by–gasp–people? …Worse yet was the grumbling afterward in the press room. Why the hell did they drag us here? we wondered. We’d been promised big news and some earth-shattering announcements by Microsoft flacks who insisted this was something we shouldn’t miss. Instead, we got a demo that was about as compelling as a root canal followed by a 15-minute press conference with Ballmer, the Microsoft chief executive who seems incapable of speaking at any level softer than a bellow.”

“Worst of all, I can’t believe Microsoft actually held this big nonevent “event” only a few days before announcing another screw-up in Vista. If Ballmer knew he was about to announce a delay and still had this event, he’s crazy. If he didn’t know Vista was about to slip again, then Microsoft is in worse shape than anyone realizes,” Lyons writes. “Given Microsoft’s delays I can’t believe open-source stuff still hasn’t caught on for desktop computers… Why not at least switch to an Apple Computer Mac? Apple’s new operating system is stable, reliable and easy to use. The applications are simple, gorgeous and work well together. And they’re here. Today. Steve Jobs must be waking up a happy man this morning.”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: “At least” switch to an Apple Mac? Versus open source alternatives, Mac OS X offers the personal computer user much, much more. The vast majority of people who use personal computers would be far better off with an Apple Mac than any other personal computer.

Apple’s brand new iPod Hi-Fi speaker system. Home stereo. Reinvented. Available now for $349 with free shipping.
Apple’s new Mac mini. Intel Core, up to 4 times faster. Starting at just $599. Free shipping.
MacBook Pro. The first Mac notebook built upon Intel Core Duo with iLife ’06, Front Row and built-in iSight. Starting at $1999. Free shipping.
iMac. Twice as amazing — Intel Core Duo, iLife ’06, Front Row media experience, Apple Remote, built-in iSight. Starting at $1299. Free shipping.
iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.
iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.

Related articles:
What’s the difference between Mac OS X and Vista? Microsoft employees are excited about Mac OS X – March 22, 2006
Vista delay causes Windows-dependents slump in pre-market trading; Apple rises – March 22, 2006
Enderle on MS Vista slip: ‘I personally can not recall Apple ever getting an opportunity like this’ – March 21, 2006
Microsoft delays Windows Vista again – this time until January 2007 – March 21, 2006
Thurrott: Microsoft going to get eaten alive over Windows Vista’s resemblance to Apple’s Mac OS X – March 09, 2006
Episode 2 of Microsoft Windows Vista, Bill Gates CES keynote video spoof now online – January 07, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista, Bill Gates keynote video spoof debuts online – January 06, 2006
NY Times’ Pogue on Gates’ CES demo: Most of Vista features unadulterated ripoffs from Apple Mac OS X – January 05, 2006
Analyst: Windows Vista may still impress many consumers because they have not seen Apple’s Mac OS X – January 05, 2006
Microsoft Vista: long-delayed and pared-down – December 14, 2005
Microsoft Windows Vista compared to Apple Mac OS X – December 05, 2005
Gartner: Ignore Microsoft Windows Vista until 2008 (why not just get Apple Mac OS X Tiger today?) – November 12, 2005
Microsoft’s Windows Vista strives to deliver what Apple’s Mac OS X already offers – October 10, 2005
Apple to unleash Leopard on Microsoft’s Windows Longhorn; Mac OS X 10.5 due late 2006 – early 2007 – June 07, 2005
Thurrott: many of Windows Vista’s upcoming features appeared first in Apple’s Mac OS X – September 26, 2005
Microsoft’s Ballmer: It’s true, some of Windows Vista’s features are ‘kissing cousins’ to Mac OS X – September 19, 2005
Microsoft suffers from malaise, key defections, Windows Vista struggles, lack of towels – September 16, 2005
PC World: Microsoft innovation – an oxymoron – September 15, 2005
Hackers already targeting viruses for Microsoft’s Windows Vista – August 04, 2005
Windows tech writer Thurrott: ‘In many ways, Mac OS X Tiger is simply better than Windows’ – May 07, 2005
Thurrott: ‘Longhorn is in complete disarray and in danger of collapsing under its own weight’ – April 27, 2005
Windows czar Allchin says Apple copying Microsoft’s Windows Longhorn – April 27, 2005
Thurrott: Longhorn ‘has the makings of a train wreck’ – April 26, 2005
Thurrott: Longhorn demos ‘unimpressive, fall short of graphical excellence found today in Mac OS X’ – April 26, 2005
Microsoft employees leaving due to (and blogging about) malaise smothering company – April 25, 2005
eWEEK Editor Coursey: Longhorn so far ‘looks shockingly like a Macintosh’ – April 25, 2005
Due in late 2006, many of Windows Longhorn’s features have been in Mac OS X since 2001 – April 25, 2005
Microsoft’s new mantra: ‘It Just Works’ ripped straight from Apple’s ‘Switch’ campaign – April 22, 2005
Apple CEO Steve Jobs on Microsoft’s Longhorn: ‘They are shamelessly copying us’ – April 21, 2005
Microsoft’s Windows Longhorn will bear more than just a passing resemblance to Apple’s Mac OS X – April 15, 2005
The Age: ‘Apple’s Mac OS X at least a generation ahead of Windows XP, iMac G5 clearly the best’ – December 15, 2004
Silicon Valley: Apple CEO Steve Jobs previews ‘Longhorn’ – June 29, 2004
Apple CEO Steve Jobs: Mac OS X Tiger ‘is going to drive the copycats crazy – June 28, 2004
Apple’s CEO Steve Jobs previews Mac OS X 10.4 ‘Tiger’ to ship in the first half of 2005 – June 28, 2004
Apple takes dead aim at Microsoft, ‘Longhorn’ with WWDC Mac OS X 10.4 ‘Tiger’ ads – June 28, 2004
PC Magazine: Microsoft ‘Longhorn’ preview shows ‘an Apple look’ – May 06, 2004
Microsoft concerned that Longhorn’s look and feel will be copied if revealed too soon – August 25, 2003
Windows ‘Longhorn’ to add translucent windows that ripple and shrink by 2005 – May 19, 2003
Apple leads; Wintel follows as usual – November 11, 2002


  1. It saddens me to say this, but I think Vista slipping will have almost no effect at all on sales of PCs or Macs / OS-X.

    The sheep who will buy a windows PC without really considering the alternatives, just because pretty much everyone else uses them will carry on. Vista won’t even be on their radar, late, crippled or otherwise. They won’t wait for Vista, they’ll just get XP … but they also won’t upgrade to Vista ina hurry – if ever. People who bought a machine with 98 and still have that machine, generally still run 98.

    This is not a criticism of Apple or OS-X, of course, this is just the reality as I see it of the people who go to PCWorld/BestBuy or whatever and buy (sorry, get sold) the machine closest to their maximum budget that gives the salesman greatest commission – regardless of whether it’s the right machine or not.

  2. I posted this earlier today but bears repeating:

    Apple creates media buzz by releasing great products on a fairly regular basis.

    M$ creates media buzz by regularly delaying the release of a second rate product.

  3. The delay is being blamed on security, drivers and performance issues. For a product that was due out something like 3 years ago, that’s pathetic. Those 3 issues are what OS X has an absolute lock on (10.0 excepted).

  4. It is clear from the comments that Microsoft has, as the Chinese say, lost the mandate of heaven. It is not just this latest delay, but the obvious contempt for Microsoft displayed by the trade press and Microsoft employees that demonstrate this.

    Windows has reached the end of its useful life. It has become a software Gordian Knot. For Microsoft, it will also be the rope by which their business will be hanged.

  5. I guess Balmer isn’t doing his usual: dancing around his office in a thick sweat, about to have a heart attack. Well maybe the heart attack applies. This guy needs firing. Actually, don’t fire him. It is fun watching Micro$oft die a slow and painful death.

    There are open source alternatives for Apple, too. Everyone should be using NeoOffice, so they don’t have to buy Micro$oft Office. It does the job and doesn’t require X11 or XDarwin.

  6. I’d be almost as thrilled about people switching to Linux as people switching to OS X. The computing world would be much better off in the long run if there were multiple OSes that many people used. Having one OS used by the vast majority of people is a big reason why the past 5 years have been stagnent in terms of what computers can do. Just think of the amount of money spent on cleaning up these virus attacks.

    Imagine if Windows, OS X, and Linux each had 33% market share. All cmpanies would support all platforms. Each platform would have to work equally well to standards that the others could use. It would not matter what platform you used – people could choose the one that worked for them. Dell, HP, and the other beige box manufactures would give you a choice of what OS to have installed and it would be cheaper to go with Linux.

    Apple has been pushing the boundaries of what can be done. Linux is quickly catching up to XP. Microsoft has been getting a lot of bad press lately and it doesn’t sound like it is going to be changing before November.

  7. And after it’s fully stripped, the Vista box will contain a Windows upgrade CD with a nifty screensaver that flashes the word, “Vista” around your monitor with adjustable transparency and drop shadows. That’s it. Just the screensaver. But it WILL be innovative and groundbreaking. After all, it took 10,000+ software engineers, billions in R & D, and half a decade to produce.

  8. MS NEEDS to get the security thing right because Apple is the standard right now for available working systems that look great, are easy to use and they’re not full of security bullet holes.

    MS can copy the look and feel but if they don’t get their system secure they will be the laughing stock of the industry and NOBODY would have a reason to upgrade to Vista regardless of how it LOOKS.

    As somebody with a significant AAPL investment, lord I hope and pray Apple uses this opportunity to advertise that the Mac has a great feature set, cool free software, security, and affordable hardware (my new MacMini Intel Solo rocks). These are things that could be brought across to the consumer in hard hitting 30 second TV ads.

    At $599 a MacMini costs a couple hundred dollars more than an X-Box and the Mini doesn’t do the big games, but the little Mac does something a dedicated entertainment-only game box will never do, it improves your life.

    The moment the X-box becomes a standalone computing appliance that approaches the MacMini feature set, that’s when Dell and HP better wake up and smell the fire, because its them becoming toast.

  9. Novell is working on providing a standard Linux desktop, I’m pretty sure they bought Suze Linux and are in the process of packaging it with an office suite and standardized installation procedure. A stable secure Linux loaded with software for $79 would be an awesome thing if it was a standardized product rather than flavor of the month.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.