“A fast-moving computer worm Tuesday shut down computer systems using Microsoft operating software, hitting computer systems across the United States and reportedly in Germany and Asia,” CNN reports.
“Among those hit were offices on Capitol Hill and media organizations, including CNN, ABC and The New York Times. The Caterpillar Co. in Peoria, Illinois, reportedly also had problems,” CNN reports. “While the worm primarily affects Windows 2000, it also can affect some early versions of Microsoft XP, said Johannes Ullrich, director of the Sans Institute… David Perry of Trend Micro, an Internet monitoring firm, said the latest worm may have been derived from the Zotob worm, which was first reported over the weekend.”
Full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: For our Windows-only friends: If you’re considering adding a safe, powerful, elegant, and fun Mac OS X machine to your computing arsenal, information about how to do so smoothly, can be found here. For inexpensive entry to the Mac platform, you might want to take a look at Apple’s new Mac mini which starts at just US$499 — it just might be the perfect machine for you.
Related MacDailyNews articles:
‘Zotob’ worm rapidly infects Microsoft Windows; Macintosh unaffected – August 15, 2005
SecurityFocus: ‘Your Windows computer is not to be trusted; buy a Mac and slip under the radar’ – July 06, 2005
Security expert sums up first month with Mac: ‘much safer, more secure, more productive than Wintel’ – June 02, 2005
Windows PC security company’s switch to Apple Mac causes overwhelming reaction – May 28, 2005
Increasing numbers of Windows PC users switching to Apple Mac for improved stability and security – May 27, 2005
Intel CEO Otellini: If you want security now, buy a Macintosh instead of a Wintel PC – May 25, 2005
Microsoft Windows Sober.P worm shows ‘epidemic’ spread; Macintosh unaffected – May 03, 2005
Apple touts Mac OS X security advantages over Windows – April 13, 2005
New ‘highly critical’ Office flaw embarrasses Microsoft – April 13, 2005
97,467 Microsoft Windows viruses vs. zero for Apple Mac’s OS X – April 05, 2005
Symantec details flaws in its antivirus software – March 30, 2005
Motley Fool writer: ‘I’d be surprised if Symantec ever sells a single product to a Mac user again’ – March 24, 2005
Symantec cries wolf with misplaced Mac OS X ‘security’ warning – March 23, 2005
Symantec’s Mac OS X claims dismissed as nonsense, FUD – March 22, 2005
Symantec warns about Mac OS X security threat – March 21, 2005
Apple’s Mac OS X is virus-free – March 18, 2005
68,736 Microsoft Windows viruses vs. zero for Apple Mac’s OS X – March 12, 2005
Microsoft tries to turn its own security flaw into commercial gain – February 25, 2005
Cybersecurity advisor Clarke questions why anybody would buy from Microsoft – February 18, 2005
Microsoft’s Gates espouses homogenous operating system environments for better security – February 07, 2005
Windows’ mounting security problems make some consumers eager to purchase Macs – January 03, 2005
Windows Media songs and videos found to carry Windows malware payloads – December 30, 2004
Anzae/Inzae worm affects all Windows versions after 3.1; Macintosh unaffected – December 28, 2004
Unlike Windows users, Mac OS X users surf the Internet without a care in the world – December 28, 2004
Multiple unpatched Windows holes crop up; Windows systems compromised within minutes in experiment – December 24, 2004
Windows spyware mess is out of control, get a Mac and surf with impunity – December 21, 2004
New Microsoft Internet Explorer exploit spoofs Web sites on fully patched Windows XP systems – December 17, 2004
Microsoft may charge extra for Windows spyware protection software – December 16, 2004
Detroit Free Press: Windows malware problem getting worse, it’s time to get a Mac instead – December 16, 2004
Sick of spyware, adware headaches? Get a Mac and surf the Internet freely – December 13, 2004
Mossberg: Windows PCs plagued with problems, Apple’s Mac is ‘rock solid, elegant and affordable’ – December 09, 2004
Security expert: Don’t use Microsoft Windows, Office, Outlook, Internet Explorer – December 09, 2004
Security test: Windows XP system easily compromised while Apple’s Mac OS X stands safe and secure – November 30, 2004
Sick of spyware, adware infecting your PC? Don’t fret, just get a Mac – November 01, 2004
Microsoft: The safest way to run Windows is on your Mac – October 08, 2004
Spyware plagues Windows users while Mac users surf Net with impunity – November 01, 2004
Ballmer blames Windows users for not upgrading systems as Microsoft’s biggest security problem – October 22, 2004
Windows users line up to pay for spyware removal; Mac users surf Web with impunity – October 18, 2004
Microsoft: The safest way to run Windows is on your Mac – October 08, 2004
Windows users’ security woes spark interest in Apple’s secure Mac OS X – October 06, 2004
Windows desktop monopoly threatened by secure, safe Apple Mac OS X – October 04, 2004
Even Bill Gates can’t avoid Windows malware; Mac users surf the Web freely – October 03, 2004
Cyber-security adviser uses Apple Macintosh to avoid Windows’ security woes – September 27, 2004
Information Security Investigator says switch from Windows to Mac OS X for security – September 24, 2004
Mossberg: Apple iMac G5 ‘powerful, affordable, virus-free with better, more modern OS than Windows XP’ – September 23, 2004
USA Today: people are switching from Windows to Mac because of security issues – September 21, 2004
Windows besieged by hackers; number of Windows viruses soars by more than 400% – September 20, 2004
USA Today columinst angry about Windows viruses, adware, spyware – September 15, 2004
University of Chicago recommends all students patch Windows at least once a day – September 14, 2004
Windows XP worm speaks to users as it deletes their files; Macintosh unaffected – September 13, 2004
Security is top priority in Apple’s Mac OS X – September 12, 2004
Millions of Windows PC’s hijacked by hackers, turned into zombies; Macintosh unaffected – September 08, 2004
Mossberg: Dump your Windows machine and get an Apple Macintosh to free yourself of spyware – August 25, 2004
Tired of patching patches to patch Windows patches? Writer suggests getting a Mac – August 03, 2004
Windows ‘Scob’ virus designed to steal financial data, passwords; Macintosh unaffected – June 26, 2004
Gartner: Worms jack up the total cost of Microsoft Windows – May 07, 2004
Spyware, adware plague Windows users online; Mac OS X users surf freely – April 19, 2004
SmartMoney: Long-suffering Windows users can only dare to dream of Mac’s ease-of-use – February 12, 2004
Mac OS X has no viruses; what’s wrong with Windows? – February 11, 2004
Gates: Windows ‘by far the most secure’ system; tries to use ‘Mac OS X secure through obscurity’ myth – January 27, 2004
Columnist tries the ‘security through obscurity’ myth to defend Windows vs. Macs on virus front – October 1, 2003
New York Times: Mac OS X ‘much more secure than Windows XP’ – September 18, 2003
Wall Street Journal’s Mossberg on making the switch from Windows to Mac – September 18, 2003
Fortune columnist: ‘get a Mac’ to thwart viruses; right answer for the wrong reasons – September 02, 2003
Shattering the Mac OS X ‘security through obscurity’ myth – August 28, 2003
Is Mac OS X really inherently more secure than Windows? – August 26, 2003
Chicago Sun-Times columnist: Windows ‘many holes in its security’ but ‘none of my Macs have ever been affected – August 26, 2003
Sick of worms and viruses? ‘Move to Mac OS X’ suggests Chicago Tribune columnist – August 25, 2003
Virus and worm problems not just due to market share; Windows inherently insecure vs. Mac OS X – August 24, 2003
so i was just watching CNN….stupid late night tv
anyways they were talking about the new worm that hit windows today and the interviewer asked this to one of his guest “IT” guys …CNN interviewer “if we all just switched to macs would we still have this problem?”
Guest IT guy “well..yes these hackers are going to go where the market is….and right now the market is in windows” sadly 98% of the public will beleive this clown.
stupid tv
Yeah, and where is Beeblebrox? Too busy with the Zotob worm on his other computer to way in and tell us, yet again, how he loves BOTH Windoze and Mac OSX equally.
MW = neither
as is, either/or not neither/nor.
Yes, it never fails to amaze me how people fall that nonsensical crap. Truth is they don’t – they just rationalise out their position, they don’t reason out the correct answer, because using Windoze has become a philosophy, a world view, a professional way of life, a paradigm.
Obviously, if I’m an IT manager and we have the usual sorts of Windows infrastructure, an ERP suite, a few Oracle databases etc. How is me shifting MY single Windows infrastructure over to Mac gonna change the whole world landscape? It’s not, I’m a drop in a vast ocean.
Everyone knows that, they’re all just spinners for their own personal reasons. But as a professional with corporate duties I don’t think they’re entitled to “they’re own opinions”. If they’re not using Macs, they’re negligent, pure and simple.
Suckers – that’s what happens when you are slave to Microsoft’s inferior OS.
When are these people gonna learn!
Unless your company relys on some bespoke windows software there is NO reason why companys should just go over to macs.
Just change the name to Wormhole 2000
Just as macnut states CNN as we know do have Mac’s and are in the process of changing over.
Being such a huge organisation it will take quite a while, so look out for snippets of news surrounding each departments ‘switch’ to Mac and their testimonials about the switch.
Mac’s use in the media isn’t new and it would be nice to hear news of say Exxon or another icon of corporate America announce their switch over to Macintosh systems and show just how Windows (sic) users have been conned and blinded by Microsoft’s (sic) rhetoric in the business arena.
CNN starts the process off, but here’s to hoping that it will catch on in the business place as a whole.
I think ignorance of the Mac is starting to be broken down, through a combination of the iPod’s success and Linux-using technology leaders switching to OS X.
But the Mac won’t truly make inroads until OS X is available on Dell, Sony and HP computers. Corporations like a choice of vendors.
It’s inevitable that Mac OS X will be licensed out. Maybe not anytime soon, but it will happen.
Microsoft is not the answer..
It is the question and the answer is no
“well..yes these hackers are going to go where the market is….and right now the market is in windows”
That’s the sound a Win IT guy makes to protect his job, feel powerful and needed.
There is absolutley no truth to it because hackers would love to boast they cracked Mac OS X with a virus, but nothing has occured yet in all these years.
Perhaps it would be cheaper in the long run for companies to create custom mac apps to replace their windoze only apps rather than fight the virii and pay for all the down time they cause.
After all of this viri stuff, decided to look at a mac since I use them at work… then saw the price…
Little too steep for what you get in my opinion.
anyways they were talking about the new worm that hit windows today and the interviewer asked this to one of his guest “IT” guys …CNN interviewer “if we all just switched to macs would we still have this problem?”
Guest IT guy “well..yes these hackers are going to go where the market is….and right now the market is in windows” sadly 98% of the public will beleive this clown.
And that is a reason (even if it totally ignored the fact that OS X is designed better) that business should start migrating over. You see, if you’re going to convince them to switch, you gotta think like them. If they believe that hackers and script-kiddies are targeting the larger percentage market, then why not switch to the ‘smaller’ market. Since Mac share is so small, that would mean it will forever stay out of the sights of hackers, right? Then the small market share is actually a benefit for security!
But everyone is probably right. No IT guy in his “right mind” would suggest switching to a computer where their company would hardly ever need them, and thus threaten them with unemployment.
Toledo:
Yeah you’re right. Why pay more for a computer that works.
What the frck was I thinking??? Luckily there’s people like you around to give good advice to all us cretons.
Toledo: After all of this viri stuff, decided to look at a mac since I use them at work… then saw the price… Little too steep for what you get in my opinion.
Would you care to give us something more specific? What do you use at work? What do you currently have at home? What Mac models did you look at?
I’m pretty sure that a G5 iMac would suit most home needs, and it compares quite well feature for feature to retail PC alternatives. Apple also has some very good deals on open box models and refurbs.
MDN had a link recently, here:
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/6573/
As is gospel around here, there is more to look at than just sticker price when comparing Macs to PCs
Viri and/or virii is not a word people. The plural for virus is “viruses” and not anything else. Thank you.
When Apple moves to the Intel chip and allows bootable Windoze will Apple be blamed for any virus attack on the windows side of the machine?
my IT guy at work asked me what version of windows the new G5 we ordered runs! He didn’t even know that Apple has its own superior operating system
ummm, I guess i will be setting it up to the network and installing all the programs.
Those kind of Windhose users never read this MDN site ..
Toledo:
When purchasing an item, look at your needs, not the price tag. Macs are a little more expensive than PC’s but you get additional hardware features such as Firewire and separate video cards, productive software and a superior OS for your dollar. Add these items to a low end PC and see how much it then costs.
As for cheap PC’s, just look at the current state of the PC market. Gateway, in financial trouble, purchased low PC maker emachines (Gateway just turned a profit for the first time in about 3 years), HP purchased Compaq and later had their CEO forced out of the company. IBM has sold their PC business and license their name to a chinese company. So today we have DELL, HP, Levono and Gateway.
And, all these manfs are depended on Windows. An OS that causes people to worry about virus, spy-ware, and ad-ware, fear of upgrading to patches or XP because of software incompatibility and that MS takes years to release new versions of the same crap.
On Guy from Finland
“Microsoft is not the answer..
It is the question and the answer is no”
You have perfectly stated the obvious! Thank you.
I went to the CNN website and posted a email to their comment line. I asked them a question concerning “recalls.” If a automobile manufacturer or a baby stroller manufacturer can produce a poor product and have the government tell them to issue a recall and repair the problem then why can’t someone go after Microsoft to do the same.
No response yet. Probably never receive one.
Let’s face it. Microsoft were screaming from the rafters last week that this was going to happen unless everyone patched their computers. The environment I work on at the moment (where I implemented WSUS, BTW) is protected. Any IT guy with any idea knows that when Microsoft scream like that you had better patch by Friday evening or face the consequences.
But, unfortunately, a lot of IT people don’t know their arse from their elbow. They don’t even read the US-CERT site to see what Microsoft (and Apple) haven’t patched yet.
Toledo:
Which PC maker bundles productivity (personal and business) apps in a fairly safe environment (as you can delete the contents of your own folders and act as your own virus (in case you want that Windows feeling), starting at $500 using your existing keyboard/mouse and monitor? Never had a computer before, the eMac might be a better choice for you then at $800 with a 17″ monitor/keyboard/mouse if you can’t decide on a monitor/keyboard/mouse to pick to go with the Mac Mini. Yeah, Dell sells desktops starting at $400 with a 17″ monitor/keyboard/mouse but that is AFTER rebates, if you get them. I bought a Dell last year for someone (to configure for them, and never got my $100 from them so I netted $0 for the consulting work). I bought my personal iBook last December and have nothing but great things in my experiences and I know PC’s very well. I worked in PC Support for Executives of a multibillion dollar company (I’ve since moved up in the company), so I am not a Mac biased person because I have only used Macs. I’ve become Mac biased because I own a Mac.
On a separate note, I have a friend who wants to get a laptop, when I suggested a Mac, the first response was, he “can’t afford it, don’t Macs cost more and are not compatible with the rest of the world?” This is brainwashing at it highest example, this is a complete computer novice saying this. The just don’t know better, until someone shows em. If this is also your expectation, then add in the cost of the software you get with a Mac but need to add with a Windows system, the true Plug and forget(Play) of a Mac (such as my HP all in one that I never had to download anything for) and the greater security (not through obscurity) of the Mac OS. If your computer “just works” and does not waste as much of your time to “protect” it, isn’t your time worth money?
I wonder if Sputnik is going to chime in and tell us about the “real IT world”?
Taking delight in the misfortune of others is just NOT right – far better to extend the hand in friendship than to gloat and mock.