
In a stark illustration of how excessive EU regulation is stifling technological progress, Apple has been forced to withhold its cutting-edge Siri AI upgrade from the European Union. The company cited insurmountable compliance hurdles imposed by Brussels’ heavy-handed Digital Markets Act (DMA) and related interoperability mandates, which prioritize bureaucratic checkboxes over user privacy, security, and timely access to innovation.
While users in the United States and other markets prepare to enjoy the new Siri AI — featuring enhanced personal context awareness, smarter on-device processing, and seamless integration powered by Apple Intelligence — EU citizens are once again sidelined by red tape. Apple reportedly spent months attempting to develop solutions that would satisfy the EU’s strict demands for interoperability with rival services, all while upholding essential privacy and security standards that protect users from data risks.
Instead of enabling innovation, EU officials rejected Apple’s proposed safeguards, such as a “Trusted System Agent” approach designed to allow controlled access for competitors without compromising the integrity of the system. The European Commission dismissed exemption requests and insisted on immediate, broad access that Apple warned could expose users to vulnerabilities. Rather than working collaboratively on practical solutions, bureaucrats doubled down on rigid rules.
“The decision not to roll out Siri AI in the EU is Apple’s and Apple’s only,” an EU Commission spokesperson claimed, shifting blame while ignoring the regulatory straitjacket that makes compliance nearly impossible without sacrificing core protections. Apple, for its part, has made clear that the DMA’s demands create unacceptable risks to user privacy and security — concerns that EU regulators appear willing to dismiss in pursuit of ideological goals around “openness.”
This episode highlights a broader pattern: EU over-regulation is handicapping European consumers and businesses. While China pours billions into AI development and the U.S. leads in deployment, Brussels’ endless rules are delaying or denying access to the latest tools for roughly 450 million people. Everyday citizens miss out on productivity gains, smarter assistants, and competitive features available elsewhere — all because bureaucrats prioritize control over progress.
Apple has stated it will continue seeking ways to bring these features safely to the EU, but with no timeline in sight due to regulators’ intransigence, Europeans are left waiting. This is not about one company failing to comply — it’s about a regulatory environment that actively discourages investment and innovation in the bloc.
MacDailyNews Take: When governments burden companies with unworkable mandates instead of fostering a competitive, innovation-friendly climate, it is ordinary citizens who pay the price through slower progress and reduced choices.
If you don’t like being deprived of innovations, EU citizens, stop electing inane bureaucrats.
The European Union arose because the Europeans couldn’t compete on their own with the rest of the world, so they each lined up to surrender their national sovereignty, unique cultures, and dignity for an undemocratic, opaque, wasteful, bloated, bureaucratic quasi-governmental blob – and, even with the EU’s thumbs all over the scale, they still can’t compete. – MacDailyNews, March 4, 2024
See also: Due to DMA, Siri AI delayed in EU for iOS 27 and iPadOS 27 – MacDailyNews, June 8, 2026
Please help support MacDailyNews — and enjoy subscriber-only articles, comments, chat, and more — by subscribing to our Substack: macdailynews.substack.com. Thank you!
Support MacDailyNews at no extra cost to you by using this link to shop at Amazon.
Unfortunately the bureaucrats are not elected and so are accountable to no one.
At the heart of European bureaucracy is respect for citizens, first as individuals, then as consumers. This eliminates the ambiguity that companies claim to be guardians of privacy without anyone being able to verify whether this is true or not, because there are laws, regulations, and agencies assigned to this task, democratically formed and controlled.
If Apple claims exemptions from existing laws simply to better exploit its consumers, it is forgetting to respect people, laws, and competition.
When the US understands this, it will also implement it; there is no better solution in the best interests of citizens.