Microsoft CEO Ballmer: ‘Apple iPod users are music thieves’

“Speaking to an exclusive gathering of press in London on a number of issues, such as security, Steve Ballmer didn’t pass up the opportunity to take several digs at his company’s arch rival Apple,” Andy McCue reports for Silicon.com. “At the heart of the debate is Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology which will let content providers such as record labels and movie studios keep control of their intellectual property (IP) – or at least ensure all royalties are paid and copyright observed.”

Andy McCue reports for Silicon.com., “Billing Microsoft as the good guys and Apple the villains of the piece – at least as far as corporate America, rather than users, is concerned, Ballmer said: ‘We’ve had DRM in Windows for years. The most common format of music on an iPod is ‘stolen.’ However, Ballmer conceded it isn’t going to be an easy battle to win. ‘Most people still steal music,’ he said. ‘We can build the technology, but there are still ways for people to steal music.'”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: If Ballmer’s correct about “stealing,” then any player capable of playing unprotected music would be the tools of thieves the world over. Interesting, Ballmer focuses only on Apple’s iPod and leaves the Dell DJ’s of the world out of his critique. And, unfortunately for Ballmer, Apple’s so far ahead, he needs a high powered telescope just to be able to see the iPod maker’s cloud of dust.

58 Comments

  1. Well, it seems that Microsoft has been insincere by alleging that Microsoft is a company that makes secure, useful, elegant, and innovative software.

    Obviously, Microsoft has been ripping off software consumers who expect something more than continual delays, complete ineptitude, repeated rumors, and abject failures.

  2. I nickname Ballmer, “Ballsmer” ’cause he has some balls to make a bullshit statement like that. If he wants to condemn a lot of happy PC-using iPod users, that’s his problem. But if they turn on him and switch, he’s got real problems then. I know all those people on campus with the white headphones aren’t Mac users. I wonder if they be interested in what their CEO thinks of the devices they love?

  3. “People still make malware,” he said. “We can build the technology but there are still ways for people to make our operating system as susceptible as a one-legged frog on an LA freeway.”

    “Most Windows users still want really cool all-in-one computer better than the G5 iMac,” he said. “I recommend the ultra-sexy, ultra-modern Gateway Profile 5.”

    “Most Windows users still want to browse the internet,” he said. “We can build the technology but it may be easier if they just used Mozilla.”

    “Most Windows users want a functional and useful 64-bit operating system with a clean and elegant search capacity,” he said. “We can build the technology but it may take Microsoft another 10 years to redefine the concept. Maybe these people who lack patience should consider Tiger instead.”

    �I don�t know what this Automator thing is. Must not be important if I know nothing about it.

    �Let me reiterate this point, if I say it�s not important, it�s not important. If Microsoft doesn�t sell, it�s not worth buying. If Microsoft doesn�t develop it, it�s not a good idea. Nothing, no matter how good, is ever better than Microsoft, even if you have to wait a full generation to get it. You will love everything Microsoft makes and anyone who chooses any other product is just damn wrong.�

  4. We’re talking to ourselves, the choir, the attendees at that London meeting need to be reminded who produces the most pirated product on the globe. If they cannot protect their own why should they be allowed to control the henhouse keys.

  5. Funny! I couldn’t stop laughing!

    Micro$oft calling Apple users thieves!

    The truth is all M$ wants is to present their DRM as the best, and that paying (for all eternity) subscriptions for all your music is the way to go. Micro$soft security is useless, their DRM and other security features have been cracked multiple times.

    Sure, you can fill your player with all the music you can fit in it. But what happens with it once you stop making payments to Micro$oft? On the other hand once you fill your player with Micro$oft secured music (ha! secured!), all you have to do is run one of the many cracking tools available on the net and cracked them open. But I’m sure that will never happen in Micro$oft land, because all PC users are saints, and this only happens with Apple users. Right? What a guy! Is like he really bought his own lies!

  6. This is rich. Apple is the first company to come up with an alternative to online piracy that makes sense, give the big speals about how it is bad karma, etc and Ballmer is trying to portray them as the bad guys. Get real.

  7. MCCFR:

    Excellent point. Ballmer insulting and demeaning Windows iPod users has got to be the epitome of stoo-pidity.

    But maybe this is Ballmer’s personality. Maybe he also calls his children “those little bastards” and his wife “worthless slut�.

  8. Most marketers know that teenagers have the most disposable income of any group. (or the ability to manipulate parents)

    When a 12 year old asks why can’t I use my music anywhere, its probably a very good idea to pay attenetion and come up with a solution.

    Dr Edwin Land (you may remember him as the inventor of the instant Polaroid Land camera) listened to his young daughter when she asked “daddy, how come we have to wait so long for the pictures?”

  9. While I agree that Ballmer is full of crap, I do feel that the original article was misleading with its title. No where in the article is he quoted as saying iPod users are “thieves.” It’s like he’s circling the wagon, so to speak, and inferring this. But for silicon.com to put that as their title is downright deceptive and unfair to monkey-boy. Maybe that’s all journalism is about anymore–putting spin on stories to make them more sensational.

    On a somewhat related note, I find it interesting that both Gates’ and Ballmer’s kids are being used as market indicators for what people want in the way of digital devices. Maybe someone should create a Ballmer/Gates family based reality TV show. That way we can all get a first-hand view of how we should all be living and enjoying digital media.

  10. From the Register:

    “He singles out the Mac maker for attention because – wait for it – “we’ve had DRM in Windows for years”. The implication is that DRM hasn’t been in the Mac OS for a similar duration, and that’s what’s allowed all those stolen tracks to seep through onto the web.

    Windows has, of course, also had Napster, Grokster, Streamcast, Aimster, Kazaa full and lite, et al for years, but – again – none of that Windows-only music theft apparatus has registered on Mr Ballmer’s radar screen, it seems.

    No, there’s no music piracy on Windows, and that’s because Windows has had DRM for so long. People haven’t been ripping CDs. They haven’t been sharing the songs using Windows-based P2P software. And other folk haven’t been downloading and transferring them to portable players. Clearly, all those shared tracks have just popped out of nowhere.

    Actually, it’s a wonder Ballmer didn’t accuse Apple of offering them itself.”

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/04/ballmer_ipod_thieves/

    If you do not come out of the article thinking Ballmer is an idiot than there is something wrong with your understanding of English.

  11. Seahawk:

    Correct me if I am wrong, but are you suggesting that Ballmer has lost all connection with reason and all touch with the real world?

    MCCFR:

    How could you do it. I looked at Mrs. Ballmer for 5 seconds and became celibate for 3 years!

  12. Mr. Simpson…

    Oh, but Ballmer did in fact call anyone and everyone who owns an iPod a thief – here’s the quote from above that warrants the headline of this article:

    “The most common format of music on an iPod is ‘stolen.'”

    If that’s not calling us thieves (yes, I own an iPod with more than 4,000 LEGITIMATELY PURCHASED AND LEGAL songs), I don’t know how else that can be interpreted. If his statement was taken out of context, I sure would like to hear the context from which that little tidbit emanated. According to the article, that’s EXACTLY what he said. Plain and simple. And if that’s the case, then he’s a total a$$ for thinking that he can get away with saying something like that without repercussion or comment to the contrary.

Reader Feedback (You DO NOT need to log in to comment. If not logged in, just provide any name you choose and an email address after typing your comment below)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.