“Apple’s filing accused Samsung of being uncooperative in the build-up to these filings, but Samsung puts all the blame on Apple and says the case still isn’t ready for a summer trial,” Mueller reports. “There’s also the usual bickering over whether Samsung makes ‘copycat products’ infringing Apple’s rights or, as the Korean company argues, ‘innovative, independently developed technologies.’”
Mueller reports, “Samsung is innovative in some areas but it adopted Google’s Android, which has been found by judges on three different continents (and, just yesterday, by a San Francisco jury) to infringe third-party intellectual property rights, and added its own infringements on top… There can be no doubt about who’s copied from whom, just like there can be no doubt about who singlehandedly revolutionized an entire industry. The only question left to be answered is about scope: which of the asserted rights are both valid and infringed? “
Tons more, including which claims were dropped and which were preserved, in the full article – recommended – here.
MacDailyNews Take: Apple’s products came first, then Samsung’s:
![]()
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader "Jax44" for the heads up.]
Related article:
Apple wins U.S. court sanctions against Samsung in patent infringement suit – May 5, 2012
5 Day Most Commented