Michael Jackson songs banned from radio stations around world, but still streaming on Apple Music

“Spotify and Apple Music have not taken action against Michael Jackson’s music catalog following the release of ‘Leaving Neverland,’ a two-part HBO documentary that accuses the pop superstar of sexually abusing two young boys in the ’80s and ’90s,” Sean Burch writes for The Wrap. “The move is a departure from the stance the two companies took against R. Kelly after the singer was hit with new accusations of sexual misconduct… Both Spotify and Apple Music removed R. Kelly’s music from its playlists last year.”

“Jackson’s music, it’s worth noting, isn’t actively featured when users open Apple Music, and hasn’t cracked Spotify’s top 200 global chart in the last week,” Burch writes. “Jackson has reentered the public conversation after ‘Leaving Neverland’ debuted on HBO on Sunday night. The four-hour documentary, which concluded on Monday night, featured comprehensive accusations from two men, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, who said that Jackson sexually assaulted them when they were young boys.”

“The Jackson estate has vehemently opposed the documentary, calling it ‘the kind of tabloid character assassination Michael Jackson endured in life, and now in death,'” Burch writes. “At the same time, the estate is suing HBO for $100 million, accusing the network of violating a non-disparagement clause that was part of an agreement the two sides had which granted HBO the right to air Jackson’s Dangerous World Tour in 1992.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Sometimes it seems like the world runs on empty gestures. There’s no need for Apple or Spotify to contribute even more.

Streaming services led by Apple Music account for 75 percent of the U.S. recording industry’s revenue – March 1, 2019
Apple Music now leads Spotify in the U.S., the No. 1 recorded music market – December 31, 2018


  1. I watched half of the HBO special about MJ.

    I think the difference is a radio staton is “pushing” music on to it’s listener. While Apple Music is letting people buy it or stream it if they choose to hear it.

  2. Understand nothing is true until proven guilty, but the evidence appears to be overwhelming.
    So, what is the stance of our mighty SJW Chief?
    MJ too important to drop?

    1. I don’t believe any company should be deciding for people. AM and Spotify users can choose to not listen to MJ. As far as radio stations go a listener can change the station

      1. Of course, that’s the right mind.
        But with some radio stations (granted they are not streaming music), and Apple and others dropped R. Kelly in the past, I am just curious to see what Apple’s position would be. I do not think they would drop MJ, but considering the potion usually expressed by the CEO on this sort of thing, I am curious. Is he at least address the issue, or keep silence to this inconvenient truth?

  3. If Apple Music removes Michael Jackson’s songs then I will immediately cancel my subscription and go with one of the services who still has them. I listen to his stuff on there all the time.

    Don’t screw around with this, Tim. I swear to God.

  4. I am conservative and a Christian and I listen to everyone. If I only bought stuff (or listened) from/to people that I agreed with politically, I would be living in a small hut in the woods. If I have the chance, I will patronize those who I agree with, but I don’t use my checkbook to make political statements, usually.

  5. Whether Michael Jackson is guilty or not, these perpetual character assassinations of people in the media, without conclusive proof is just wrong. Many people can and will say anything for money. If he did it, he’s dead now, it’s over, he’s not coming back ever to do it again.

  6. I could see this if he was still alive and benefiting from the revenue. He is not. The songs are not a representation of the acts he is accused of and he is not benefiting from their sale so keep them.

  7. Michael Jackson is DEAD and the money made from his music today goes toward people like Katherine Jackson and his children who had NOTHING to do with the accusations against Michael.

  8. If every indecent act committed by every performer, musical or otherwise, was known and banned we’d have precious little enetertainment left to hear or watch. (Not that a pedophile or sexual predator/abuser should be let off easy.)

    1. Amen to that, bro. Being allowed to perform indecent acts on people is practically a perk for being a top performer. It’s probably in their contracts thanks to their lawyers/managers negotiating with the recording/film companies. That’s playing hardball.

      I thought there were always rumors about Michael Jackson and him touching underage males. Meanwhile, his records sold like crazy. I mean, hey, it’s the only talent and selling power that matters in this world. As long as an entertainer makes a lot of money (for all involved), they can do whatever they want while everyone turns a blind eye to their activities.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.