After being cut out of iPhone 5 and 5s, Samsung said supplying Apple DRAM for next-gen ‘iPhone 6’

“Key component partner and fierce rival Samsung has reportedly wedged its way back into Apple’s supply chain for the next iPhone, as the South Korean company will allegedly be one of three companies supplying dynamic random-access memory for the ‘iPhone 6,'” Neil Hughes reports for AppleInsider.

“Samsung was actually cut out of Apple’s DRAM business starting with the iPhone 5 and carrying over to the iPhone 5s, according to analyst Timothy Arcuri of Cowen and Company,” Hughes reports. “But for the ‘iPhone 6,’ Samsung has been reportedly brought back into the fold, he said in a note to investors on Monday.”

Hughes reports, “Other DRAM suppliers for Apple’s next-generation iPhone are said to be Micron and Elpida.”

Read more in the full article here.

Related articles:
Samsung returns to mimicking Apple’s iPhone with chamfered metal-edged Galaxy Alpha – August 13, 2014
Samsung sheds $15 billion on shrinking earnings – August 1, 2014
As Apple’s profits and iPhone sales grow, Samsung posts stagnating sales, weak profits – July 31, 2014
Samsung’s net profit declines on weaker-than-expected phone sales – July 30, 2014
Samsung’s new ad for Galaxy Gear stupidwatch slavishly copies Apple’s original 2007 iPhone ad (with video) – October 7, 2013
Samsung announces plastic Galaxy S4 ‘Gold Edition’ phone – September 25, 2013
Samsung slavishly copies Apple’s iPad mini with Galaxy Tab 3 (with photo) – July 23, 2013
9 ways Samsung has slavishly copied Apple over the years – July 14, 2013
Now Samsung copies Apple product rumors, said to be working on wristwatch device – March 19, 2013
Samsung’s new ‘Wallet’ bears striking resemblance to Apple’s Passbook – February 27, 2013
Korea JoongAng Daily: Samsung must stop slavishly copying Apple – September 3, 2012
South Korea reassesses its great imitator, Samsung – September 2, 2012
Is Samsung copying Apple’s patented earphones? It sure looks like it – September 8, 2012
Samsung mimics Apple product videos in Galaxy S III promo (with video) – August 24, 2012
Now slavish copycat Samsung attempts to knockoff Apple’s retail stores (with video) – August 23, 2012
Samsung: Shameless slavish copiers – August 13, 2012
Now Samsung slavishly copies Apple’s Mac mini – June 1, 2012
Samsung Mobile chief ‘designer’ denies that Samsung’s instinct is to slavishly copy Apple – March 23, 2012
Slavish copier Samsung shamelessly steals Apple’s iPhone 3G design – again – January 3, 2012
Slavish copier Samsung uses girl actress from iPhone 4S ad for Galaxy Tab 8.9 spot (with video) – January 2, 2012
Now Samsung’s slavishly copying Apple’s iPad television ads (with videos) – December 30, 2011
Judge: Can you tell me which is iPad and which is yours? Samsung lawyer: ‘Not at this distance your honor’ – October 14, 2011
Why are Apple’s icons on the wall of Samsung’s store? – September 24, 2011
Apple to Samsung: ‘Blatant copying is wrong’ – April 18, 2011
Apple sues Samsung for attempting to copy look and feel of iPhone, iPad – April 18, 2011
Samsung’s ‘Instinct’ is obviously to make Apple iPhone knockoffs – April 1, 2008


  1. Apple is going to buy the best components at the lowest prices. They’re not going to spend a few billion dollars elsewhere simply because Samsung hurt their feelings. It’s not like as if a loss of DRAM business affects their ability to continue to produce phones that compete with the iPhone or tablets that compete with the iPad.

    The transitioning away from Samsung has more to do with the nature of the industry and that there are smaller companies biting at the chance to grab Samsung’s business. For these companies, Apple is in a unique position to bring Billions of dollars to them that they can in turn use to build the infrastructure to produce cost/quality competitive components for Apple.

    In the end, if no company can step up, Apple is going to go with the best price where the quality meets a specified threshold regardless of whether that’s Samsung or any other competitor.

    1. I agree with part of your sentiment, but in counterpoint, giving “anything” to an IP-stealing competitor is a dangerous game.

      To this end, I can see Apple working to curate competition to Samsung’s products, as well as trying to limit one’s purchases with Samsung to “lower tech” commodities (such as DRAM) that has minimal profit margins. Overall, Apple’s shut-off of Samsung for the iPhone 5/5s was very much intended to send a message that Samsung’s activities in certain business units can have impact on other business units.

  2. Samsung are the best supplier of quality components to Apple. Look at all the issues that Apple needs to deal with when other companies supply components for them. LG display issues with MacBook Air Retina, iPhone 5 and 5S and C. The top performing SSD’s come from Samsung and not Toshiba or others. In a perfect world, Samsung should tone down the rhetoric and be more respectful of Apple as their collaborations are unmatched and endless. Both great companies with huge brain thrusts.

    1. Jim (anonymous coward): You credentials are showing. To say Samsung has a ‘huge brain thrust‘ is HiLaRIouS! I have to respond:

      A) If Samsung had brains, they wouldn’t be court convicted plagiarists, would they. When you can’t innovate, imitate.

      B) THRUSTing is about all brain damaged Samsung is good for. You don’t want their baby ladies! Beware.

      Thrust THRUST THRUST those cheap knockoffs into the market! THRUST marketing!

      Samsung: Go thrust yourself.

    2. Dear Brainthrust,

      Thanks for your unique insight into Apple’s supply chain. How long have you and Tim been working together? “Samsung are the best…” – you should have stopped right there, because the rest is unsupportable drivel. How did you ever come that conclusion? No good SSD’s from anyone else? How about Intel. Display problems with iPhone 5s due to LG? What display problem are you referring to? You do know three different companies produce screens, right? And, that most of the problems were with Sharp displays – though the rMBPs are LG’s screen issues. You knew that right? You and Tim must have talked about it. Maybe he isn’t telling you everything? As for SSDs, I think Intel is a nice match for Apple, what does Tim think though?

      Can’t wait to hear more from you and Tim! Thanks for the razor-sharp insight.

      And as to Mr. Currie, yea, he’s a real a-hole all right, but only to pinheaded jerks who come on here trolling for Apple bytes.



    1. Your point is moot unless Apple can sell to consumers other than their regular buyers. 88% ofthe world runs on Android and Samsung is a huge benefactor. Samsung has no issues whatsoever collaborating with Apple for this very reason.

      1. Dear Brainthrust,

        Your figures are meaningless, and wrong. It’s more like 85% of smartphones running Android, not 88%. Perhaps that’s a “rounding error” on your part, so lets move on to Samsung’s share of that share – it has dropped 8 percentage points since last year from about 32% to just 24%, versus Apple who have dropped from 13% to 11%. And of course, those Samsung numbers are based on shipped units, not sold units. All figures are for worldwide sales. See here for some facts:

        Samsung has big issues. Some have been pointed out in places other than this little website too. Like, several federal courts in several countries. This may have even had something to do with Samsung’s little slip in the marketplace. Come back soon, I find your discourse endlessly fascinating.



  3. ???
    I thought the DRAM was built into the SOC package?
    Wouldn’t the CPU provider be providing the DRAM?
    Or is it hacked onto the CPU before it’s all put in the package?

  4. I buy Samsung memory chips for my Macs. I wish that other supplies could match their quality, but no they don’t. I just wish I didn’t have to feel dirty every time I buy products from Samsung.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.