Samsung returns to mimicking Apple’s iPhone with chamfered metal-edged Galaxy Alpha

“Samsung has announced a new metal-edged flagship smartphone that takes its design language a step closer to the iPhone — and gives it something to fend off competition from surefooted Android startup Xiaomi,” Natasha Lomas reports for TechCrunch. “The latter has been gobbling Samsung’s lunch in China and just last month announced its own iPhone-a-like flagship, the metal-edged Mi 4. Bottom line: What Xiaomi can copy, Samsung can copy, too.”

“Question is whether Apple will fire up its lawyers for another design infringement court battle, given that the last one resulted in a near $1 billion bill for Samsung,” Lomas reports. “The new 4G Samsung handset is called the Galaxy Alpha, and on the specs front packs a generous but not crazy big 4.7 inch HD Super AMOLED display.”

Samsung's Galaxy Alpha
Samsung’s Galaxy Alpha

 
“Samsung’s fingerprint sensor is also on board,” Lomas reports. “There’s 32GB of internal memory and no Micro SD expansion slot — presumably that’s had to be sacrificed to make way for the seamless metal-band design… Samsung describes the new design as refined, sophisticated and compact in terms of construction. It does not say ‘iPhone-esque’ but if Steve Jobs were around to see it he’d hardly be mincing a verdict.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Without Apple’s trade dress to infringe, Samsung would be utterly lost.

Samsung can’t sell phones with their own crappy “design” – cheap plastic injection-molded by the blind – so they go back to their only successful play: Knocking off Apple’s iPhone.

Samsung’s ‘Instinct’ is obviously to make Apple iPhone knockoffs.

Apple’s products came first, then Samsung’s:

Samsung Galaxy and Galaxy Tab Trade Dress Infringement

Here’s what Google’s Android looked like before and after Apple’s iPhone:

Google Android before and after Apple iPhone

Here’s what cellphones looked like before and after Apple’s iPhone:
cellphones before and after Apple iPhone

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Dan K.” for the heads up.]

Related articles:
Samsung sheds $15 billion on shrinking earnings – August 1, 2014
As Apple’s profits and iPhone sales grow, Samsung posts stagnating sales, weak profits – July 31, 2014
Samsung’s net profit declines on weaker-than-expected phone sales – July 30, 2014
Samsung’s new ad for Galaxy Gear stupidwatch slavishly copies Apple’s original 2007 iPhone ad (with video) – October 7, 2013
Samsung announces plastic Galaxy S4 ‘Gold Edition’ phone – September 25, 2013
Samsung slavishly copies Apple’s iPad mini with Galaxy Tab 3 (with photo) – July 23, 2013
9 ways Samsung has slavishly copied Apple over the years – July 14, 2013
Now Samsung copies Apple product rumors, said to be working on wristwatch device – March 19, 2013
Samsung’s new ‘Wallet’ bears striking resemblance to Apple’s Passbook – February 27, 2013
Korea JoongAng Daily: Samsung must stop slavishly copying Apple – September 3, 2012
South Korea reassesses its great imitator, Samsung – September 2, 2012
Is Samsung copying Apple’s patented earphones? It sure looks like it – September 8, 2012
Samsung mimics Apple product videos in Galaxy S III promo (with video) – August 24, 2012
Now slavish copycat Samsung attempts to knockoff Apple’s retail stores (with video) – August 23, 2012
Samsung: Shameless slavish copiers – August 13, 2012
Now Samsung slavishly copies Apple’s Mac mini – June 1, 2012
Samsung Mobile chief ‘designer’ denies that Samsung’s instinct is to slavishly copy Apple – March 23, 2012
Slavish copier Samsung shamelessly steals Apple’s iPhone 3G design – again – January 3, 2012
Slavish copier Samsung uses girl actress from iPhone 4S ad for Galaxy Tab 8.9 spot (with video) – January 2, 2012
Now Samsung’s slavishly copying Apple’s iPad television ads (with videos) – December 30, 2011
Judge: Can you tell me which is iPad and which is yours? Samsung lawyer: ‘Not at this distance your honor’ – October 14, 2011
Why are Apple’s icons on the wall of Samsung’s store? – September 24, 2011
Apple to Samsung: ‘Blatant copying is wrong’ – April 18, 2011
Apple sues Samsung for attempting to copy look and feel of iPhone, iPad – April 18, 2011
Samsung’s ‘Instinct’ is obviously to make Apple iPhone knockoffs – April 1, 2008

41 Comments

  1. It’s amazing how much I take the time when buying stuff now to see if it’s Samsung-labeled. I know so many people like to point out that so many electronics have Samsung parts. Yes, I know that. Save your fingers and don’t bother telling me.

    All the bitching in the world won’t change anything if people keep buying Samsung (consumer) products. I’ll buy a shittier Panasonic TV before I buy a fancy Samsung one.

      1. I didn’t mean to imply that Panasonic makes shittier devices. I just meant, if I can get an OK Panasonic whatever at $500 or a much better Samsung whatever at $399, I’m still going with Panasonic. I think Panasonic still makes good stuff, as far as I know…

      2. Same here with my Panasonic Plasma (sadly plasma’s are join the way of the Dodo).

        Samsung brand is permanently off my purchase list for all their transgressions and copying. Easy to buy other great alternatives. Many folks though have no moral compass that instructs them to boycott Samsung and are even surprised that you do.

    1. I do some custom construction and remodeling. I purchase electronics and appliances all the time and Samsung products have been removed from all my purchase decisions.
      I can’t remove Samsung “parts” from everything but I can keep from buying Samsung branded products and will continue to do so.
      Screw them.

  2. Everyone copies Apple.

    There are far more now companies leveraging their looks towards the phones of iPhone 4 to iPhone 5s — but larger screen sizes.

    iPhone 6 will blow them all away again.
    And all who seek a larger screen will finally be ever so happy.

    I still wonder, when is someone going to create
    the DEAD SIMPLE smartphone?

    A super simple smartphone that does it all – yet:
    – no view of its apps – so no buttons
    – everything auto updates
    – no games to download
    – no music files but plays radio or subscribed songs
    – maps, dialling, contacts, notes and browsing all done by siri
    – a phone that really is better than all the rest

    1. Totally agree.

      All these wannabes and copycats can try and mimic Apple’s innovations but only Apple products will have the Apple logo on it.

      And that’s THE one thing they can never copy – the Apple brand.

      1. On the contrary, you can see copy-cat products out there barring the Apple logo. One recently runs a skin of IOS7 yet is really Android and suggests the iPhone 6 size and design. Including a Apple Logo.

        This type of working mock-up MUST STOP, as it harms the Apple brand.

  3. MDN take is great, still, what is far worse about coping Apples look, are three missing factors.

    1) Samsung was under contract to produce iPhone – a partnership that should have forced Samsung not to copy Apple at all – not in any way. Yet they did, knowing well all components internally. I think this is a illegal bridge of trust on Samsungs part. Apple should be able to sue them for far more.

    2) Apple offered exclusive rights to IOS to Samsung, however they declined to use iOS. Knowing behind Apples back they would obtain Googles Android for nothing. Thank Google for that.

    3) Google, created its Android OS. To date its closest clone of iOS and the most accepted handset operating system freely distributed to mostly Asian makers. Google is a trader of America innovation. Granting such a free gift to compete with Apple, and used to by other countries to rob our banks and credit cards.

    1. sounds like you have no idea what you are talking about:

      1) Foxconn was under contract to assemble iPhone — Samsung designed and manufactured Apple’s ARM based APs until 2012 along with other major components of iDevices (eg, memory, displays). Here Samsung is accused of copying their physical design, not the underlying tech. Further, Samsung has been making mobile devices at least decade longer than Apple. Samsung beat Apple in touch-screen smartphone by a couple of years, eg F700 — though they were never as successful as Apple’s iPhone.

      2) Apple never licenses out their iOS to anybody outright. Period. You probably meant a handful of UI utility patents (eg, slide-to-unlock). Samsung and Apple agreed to drop all non-US lawsuits last week after most of Apple’s patents are either invalidated or completely thrown out of the courts around the world.

      3) sure, your xenophobic overture may have some appeal to Apple’s biased hometown jury, but Apple isn’t so patriotic when it comes to funneling its massive profit in offshore / Ireland subsidiary to avoid taxes or outsourcing most of its manufacturing jobs to Asian makers. Perhaps none of these copy-cat issues would have become a problem, had Apple kept manufacturing jobs here. Apple’s best defense? everyone else’s doing it.

  4. No court would ever support Apple for such things like chamfered edges or some similar design. Besides, most companies would pay the judge to put rulings in their favor. It’s what’s called protection money. So far, Apple hasn’t learned how to pay the right people for protection. Apple needs to get a little closer to the politicians so things will go their way if they have any problems with patents and stuff. Smartphones are big moneymakers and Apple throwing a million dollars here and there could help Apple immensely. Being honest can only take a company so far.

    1. yeah – the court system does not understand design and the protection of its countries efforts in innovation – the law stiffles the entire process – slow as a snail

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.