Apple sued for 2nd time over iMessage failure to deliver texts to Android phones

“Plaintiffs Adam Backhaut and Bouakhay Joy Backhaut of Macomb County, Michigan and Kenneth Morris of Riverside County, California have launched a Class Action against Apple in San Jose,” Jack Purcher reports for Patently Apple. “The case is about Apple’s iMessage not working properly with Android smartphones. This latest Class Action lawsuit was filed yesterday – just one day after Californian Adrienne Moore filed her Class Action against Apple over the very same issue.”

“Plaintiff Adam Backhaut purchased an iPhone 5 in December 2012 at a Best Buy store in Michigan. At the time of purchase, a Best Buy employee set up his iPhone 5, including iMessage. Mr. Backhaut used the iPhone 5 for approximately one year,” Purcher reports. “Plaintiff Joy Backhaut purchased an iPhone 5 at the same time and place as her husband and a Best Buy employee also set up her iPhone 5, including iMessage.”

“In December 2013, Plaintiff Adam Backhaut purchased an “‘HTC One’ for approximately $250.00, which runs an Android operating system, and switched the number previously associated with his iPhone 5 to his new phone,” Purcher reports. “Following Mr. Backhaut’s switch to an Android based phone, Mrs. Backhaut continued to text her husband as she had previously used the Messages app on her iPhone. When Mrs. Backhaut texted her husband, her iPhone indicated that the texts she was sending were “delivered.” In fact, Mr. Backhaut never received these messages. The messages continued to be intercepted by Apple’s iMessage system, despite the fact that the Plaintiff was no longer an iPhone user.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Solution: Don’t downgrade from an iPhone to an inferior iPhone knockoff.

In the immortal words of Ben Stern, “I told you not to be stupid, you moron.”

Related article:
Apple sued over vanishing texts to Android phones – May 17, 2014


  1. PA asks the question whether you think that this is coincidental that 2 class action lawsuits were filed within a 24 hour period or if it’s an android oem (ahem samsung) behind this. I’ll take a guess and say that i think it’s those SAMSUNG ASS HOLES IHMO

  2. One doesn’t send or use iMessage with anyone who does not have an iPhone, d’uh. What’s the mystery here? When one leaves the Apple eco-system, one has to deal with the junkyards they find themselves in.

    1. If you send a text from an iPhone to a non-iPhone it doesn’t use the iMessage system. That’s the issue.
      Quoted from the article. “The messages continued to be intercepted by Apple’s iMessage system, despite the fact that the Plaintiff was no longer an iPhone user”

      BTW. I think it’s an assinine suit also. The ineptness of the user doesn’t justify frivolous lawsuits.

    1. No, that’s the whole point. The way it works is that when you turn on iMessage and send messages, they first ping Apple’s server to see if the recipient can receive an iMessage, if so, it does that. If not, it sends an SMS if your device has the capability.

      Likewise, when someone sends a message and you both have iMessage turn on, you receive an iMessage. When iMessages are sent and received, your carrier is 100% out of the loop.

      Apple knows who is capable of receiving an iMessage because when you turn iMessage on, you’re registering your number with Apple’s server. If Apple has your number in their database as being iMessage capable, it will send that message and not an SMS until you turn iMessage off.

      Apple has no way of knowing any of the various conditions that a person may want to receive an SMS instead of an iMessage if they’ve never deactivated iMessage. For example, if your iPhone falls to the bottom of the ocean, there’s no way for Apple to know that you didn’t just turn off your iPhone, and when you get a new phone, there’s no way for Apple to know that you’ve done so.

      For everyone else sending SMS messages, those still go through the carrier, so you’d receive them on the new phone (regardless of manufacturer). For those sending from iMessage, since Apple still doesn’t know not to send you an iMessage you won’t get your message unless you have a new iPhone and have turned on iMessage on that new iPhone.

      The answer of course is to turn off iMessage on all of your devices in order to have Apple know not to send you an iMessage at your registered number.

      The problem occurs when you don’t know this, or when you don’t have the ability to do this (iPhone stolen, bottom of the ocean, broken, etc…).

      When this occurs, the only current solution is to call Apple Support. Unfortunately, that requires paying a fee if your device isn’t covered.

      Here’s what Apple should do:

      Allow users to log into a website and turn on or turn off iMessage for their devices. This could be the website and they could have a new icon for iMessage allowing you to turn on/off iMessage as well as to allow iMessage access via the web. This would have the added benefit that if you lost your iPhone you could still get your iMessages from any web capable device in the world.

      Until Apple does this, while this doesn’t seem lawsuit-worthy to me, it is something to be aware of as a optional user of iMessage.

      1. Yet still, the scenario is even smaller than you describe. This scenario can only be a problem if you replacement phone is an android device. If you activate your old phone (for the phone that was dumped into the ocean) onto a new iPhone, apple is smart enough to know that the new iPhone is your new phone and that is the phone now associated with you iMessage account. If you then go into iMessage and deactivate iMessage on that new iPhone you can port your number to a new android phone and iMessage will de-register your phone number from the iMessage directory.

        Most carriers should be able to this with a loaner iPhone as a courtesy when you buy your new phone.

        I have done it for others myself, to de-register the phone number.

        1. I think you’re missing the point that being able to log into to turn off iMessage is somewhat of a no-brainer solution, both in terms of making it easier for the user as well as reduced support costs for Apple (along with not pissing people off, even if they are idiots).

          Sure, if my iPhone gets lost, stolen, damaged or otherwise seizes to function while on a trip, I’d reach into my backpack, grab my backup iPhone and be slowed down only to the point of either swapping the SIM or calling for activation. Great, I’m not exactly worried about this.

          However, for anyone traveling where they don’t have access to a loaner iPhone or even the ability to purchase an iPhone, they could end up being screwed simply because Apple didn’t build this functionality into

          As I mentioned earlier, they’re even missing an opportunity to have iMessage itself be iCloud accessible. Forget your iPhone at home, no problem… check your SMS messages anywhere in the world with a web browser.

    1. Exactly. I really doubt it would make it to class action anyway.

      Just turn off iMessage and then the text will go through just fine. I had a friend who said she wasn’t getting messages from her iPhone friends and as soon as I told them to turn on SMS they got them just fine. Maybe they should read the part were iMessage only works on Apple devices.

      1. I’m sure apple will ask for a preliminary judgement, the judge will look at the last case, and warn the plaintiff they will find in favor of apple unless the plaintiff can show new evidence to change the finding in this case and that they will proceed anyways because they are incapable of logical thought.

  3. I’m not your typical user, I drive a variety of smartphones (iPhone, Android, BlackBerry and Windows Phone) as part of my need to support a variety of platforms in my business. It’s a pain in the ass to unlink your mobile number from iMessage, but it’s not something that cannot be done. Apple even provides a KB with instructions on how to do so (a link at the bottom of this page While not overtly obvious that this can be done, a little searching will turn up this article in 5 minutes. I guess it’s easier to launch a lawsuit than it is to spend the 5 minutes and figure out how to turn this functionality off.

  4. The lawyer, William Audet, was previously trying to get another class action against Apple for some idiocy about iPhones ‘leaking’ personal information. (case 11-md-02250)

    The case was of course later dismissed. I guess the lawyer, who likes to title himself as a ‘Super Lawyer’ on his webpage, wasn’t really happy with that outcome.

          1. Troubleshooting, I think it’s because I had ‘stealth’ mode on, which kills pings back and forth back to the router.

            As for Stinko biloba: One of my favorite trees! Ancient. Except, you don’t want a female of the species in your yard. They grow an inch diameter yellow/orange fruit that ripens, then drops of the tree in a little pile of mush that… Well, it depends on the year, but the mush stinks like either:
            A) Barf
            B) Dog dump

            Apparently, Ginko evolved way before the development of bees. The pollenater creatures were flies. Therefore, stinking like rotting stuff attracted the flies who would fly around and pollenate between the male and female Ginkos. But why do the fruit stink like rot? The seed inside is about 1/2 inch wide, teardrop shaped, not of interest to any fly. Maybe the flies ate the rot stuff and the seed could roll around in the wind. They’re very light seeds despite the size. Speculation.

            Anyway, I call Ginko biloba the Barf Berry Tree.

  5. This is just a headline attention grabber. Lawsuits cost money, follow the money. I’m sure Audet knows by now which deep pocket to get his money from.

  6. Not only is this Shark in a Brooks Bros. suit out to suck some cash from Apple’s hoard, he wants to steal 50% of the first Shark’s cash cow by forcing the two lawsuits into one.

    Ripping off Apple and one of his own shark buddies too.

    I hope they both have to pay Apple when they lose.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.