Why Apple will win the battle for your wrist

“At some point, Apple is widely expected to release a miniature computer for your wrist. Assuming the rumors pan out, you, dear geek, are going to hate whatever is released — because it’s not going to do many of the things that you think such a device should do,” Brian Ford writes for ReadWrite. “Your favorite tech blogs will reaffirm your skepticism by releasing scathing reports about how underwhelming Apple’s newest gadget is, at least when compared against the hype they created about what Apple’s newest gadget should have been. Apple will be doomed, yet again. Tim Cook’s got to go! Cue the sad trombone.”

MacDailyNews Take: Well, the truth of that that depends on which blog is your favorite.

“Ignore all of that. An Apple watch, if it is released, is going to be a big deal,” Ford writes. “In the end, Apple will release a product that looks great and works like it’s supposed to, even if it’s not exactly what we expect, or think we want, out of a smartwatch. And we’ll buy it. The peripheral market for accessories will quickly materialize, at which point the competition, left dumbfounded, will be forced to go back to the drawing board in an effort to mimic Apple’s vision of wrist-based computing. In a few years, you’ll either be wearing Apple’s smart watch, or something remarkably similar to Apple’s smart watch. Not long after that, some anonymous commenter sporting a Samsung Galaxy W will feel clever and point out that Apple didn’t really do anything all that revolutionary.”

Read more in the full article here.

Related articles:
Apple’s iWatch imminent? – April 22, 2013
Survey shows exceptionally strong consumer interest in an Apple ‘iWatch’; iPhone dominates in customer satisfaction – April 19, 2013
iWatch? Apple’s Kevin Lynch heading former team of iPod engineers on new projects – April 12, 2013
Apple’s iWatch will measure far more than time – March 12, 2013
Disney ‘MagicBands’ showcases massive potential for Apple’s iWatch – March 6, 2013
Apple’s iOS-powered ‘iWatch’ facing battery life challenge, sources say – March 4, 2013
Apple seeks to introduce ‘iWatch’ as soon as this year, says source – March 4, 2013
Apple doesn’t need Corning for an iWatch, LG Display is ready to go with flexible OLED displays – March 3, 2013
Apple supplier Corning: It’ll be three years before companies start making ‘Willow’ flexible display products – February 28, 2013
Apple patent for flexible display slap bracelet ‘iWatch’ could fire up stock again – February 22, 2013
How to profit from Apple’s iWatch, Nike’s FuelBand and Google’s Glass – February 22, 2013
Apple’s iWatch concept is real – and here’s how it might work – February 22, 2013
ABI Research: Apple ‘iWatch’ could prove to be revelation in wearable tech – February 21, 2013
Apple patent application reveals slap bracelet ‘iWatch’ with flexible touchscreen display – February 21, 2013
Apple ‘iWatch’ leaks: Preemption or desperation? – February 19, 2013
Patents may point the way towards Apple iWatch – February 19, 2013
Samsung trying to beat Apple to market with ‘iWatch’ rival? – February 15, 2013
What if an Apple iWatch replaced most of the iPhone’s functions? – February 13, 2013
Apple ‘iWatch’ beyond ‘experimentation phase,’ sources say – February 13, 2013
Features that would make Apple’s iWatch a killer product – February 12, 2013
7 reasons why Apple’s unannounced ‘iWatch’ won’t fly – February 12, 2013
Patent application reveals Apple secretly developing wearable computing platform – February 12, 2013
Morgan Stanley: Apple iWatch, iTV could generate additional $80 billion annually – February 12, 2013
With ‘iWatch,’ Apple could turn wearable devices into next big thing – February 12, 2013
Why Apple is working on ‘iWatch,’ not ‘iGlasses’ – February 11, 2013
WSJ: Apple testing ‘iWatch’ device – February 11, 2013
iWatch: Apple developing curved-glass smart watch, sources say – February 11, 2013
Tog: The iWatch will fill a gaping hole in the Apple ecosystem – February 7, 2013
Why Apple should hang-up on the iPhone, iWear is next – January 6, 2013
Analyst sees wearable computers from Apple as future replacement for iPhone – January 2, 2013
Apple and Intel secretly building Bluetooth smartwatch that connects to your iOS devices, say sources – December 27, 2012
Apple patent application details display-integrated cellular antennas – May 6, 2012
Apple patent app details next-gen microstrip cellular antenna for future MacBooks, iWatch and beyond – October 25, 2011


  1. There is no battle for the wrist. If Apple chooses to make an iWatch, it will be everything more than a watch and seamlessly integrate and unify all personal Apple devices, because Apple has a plethora of devices and they all speak Apple OS.

    1. Still it’ll be amusing to see what Samsung will think is a step up in the only “innovation” they know (size) and come out with a 10″ watch flailing about. Someone needs to make a parody stat! “The Samsung Galaxative Armblet 10.” (“Buy one for each wrist and fly & glide off perilous cliffs Sister Bertrille style in relative safety and comfort.”)

  2. I’ll take a tablet over a stupid watch any day.

    I never wore a watch until I served in the military and have not worn one since the day I was discharged 8 years later. I do not plan on wearing one again.

        1. Thank you. Nevertheless, I already wear a silly iPod nano 6 with a god awful case on my wrist, I can’t wait for Mr Jony’s take on a what a smartwatch really should (could) be. I’ll be buying one for sure.
          Go Apple!

  3. And within two years of that release when every company out there has a copycat the Android-lovers out there I see on so many tech sites who don’t seem to have a memory prior to 2007 will say things like, “Apple did not invent smart watches. There were tons of them before Apple. Can’t believe Cupertino is suing again,” maddeningly oblivious to the fact the thing on their wrist will look remarkably similar to Apple’s offering.

    We’ve seen it with computers, music players, phones and tablets. Why would it be any different with watches?

  4. The best part of the article? The last two sentences:

    In a few years, you’ll either be wearing Apple’s smart watch, or something remarkably similar to Apple’s smart watch. Not long after that, some anonymous commenter sporting a Samsung Galaxy W will feel clever and point out that Apple didn’t really do anything all that revolutionary.”

  5. Why Apple will win the battle for your wrist… is that because Apple will hire a bunch of ‘jerk offs’ from Google? Wrist… Jerk offs… you getting me people?! Maybe they can get Eric Schmidt?

  6. I also remember when the iPhone was launched many tech blogs and comments on them poninted out that the iPhone wasn’t anything special because they already had such phones in Japan… Clearly that wasn’t the case because Apple went on the revolutionise the world and Google and later Goosung copied everything they could get their hands on.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.