Did Tim Cook pay $60 million iPad settlement out of own pocket?

“Pointing out that Apple CEO Tim Cook in May refused his US$75 million dividends from over 1 million shares, Proview’s founder and chairman Yang Rongshan–who fought with Apple for the iPad trademark in China and was awarded US$60 million by the court–said people around him realized the amount was ‘very close with the compensation Apple would pay for Proview,'” Cyrus Lee reports for ZDNet.

“Ray Mai, who served in the legal department for Proview’s Taiwan arm, held the same view. Speaking to IT Times, a mainland-based technology newspaper, Mai said the trademark dispute was distinguishable from other infringement cases as someone in Apple who had made a mistake, and the consequences of which should not be passed to the shareholders,” Lee reports. “‘Since Steve Jobs was gone, Cook should take up the responsibility,’ said Mai.”

Lee reports, “Apple lost a lawsuit against Proview in December 2011 when it said it was the legitimate owner of the iPad trademark in China. In a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in late-May 2012, Apple indicated Cook asked his restricted stock units not receive dividends amounting to around US$75 million. A Chinese higher court announced last month Apple paid US$60 million to Proview and settled the case through mediation in China.”

Read more in the full article here.

30 Comments

    1. Regardless of the truth, if the shoe fits and it makes the people happy with what is reported, especially Chinese, at this very moment, then by all means run with it. Who cares about Peoview, they hopefully can make a stain into a win for Apple, with this type of rhetoric.

      Yes we poop on you, but here is a duck feast in your honor.

    1. Exactly. Of all the things we have ever read on this website, this one is by far the one that should most be labeled conjecture. There are a zillion reasons why Cook might not have taken the dividends, not the least of which is taxes. This Mai guy sounds like he’s been watching too many stupid kung fu movies. No one is falling on any swords here. $65 million dollars is nothing to Apple these days. Someone at Apple made mistakes? I don’t think so.

      I don’t even think it’s “pure speculation.” It’s speculation polluted by BS.

  1. A ridiculous headline. Apples owes $60 to Proview, Tim Cook declines to take $75 million so Tim is paying for the extra money to a criminal China blackmailer? Some writer should be shot for cluttering up Internet space with such a blatant web baiting hit. Utter nonsense association and conclusion.

    1. There was no mistake by Apple, except to think they could do legal business in China. It’s a criminal nation where laws do not apply. Apple owned the rights, including in China, and China decided to do a mafia-esque “shake down” not because there was any legal basis, but because this is China, a criminal nation of thugs.

  2. Oh come on!
    Linking two similar figures to a deal we will never know anything about? And coming up with a reason that doesn’t make sense in today’s corporate world. And all this from a story on Zdnet without an ounce of corroboration.
    Urban myth in the making.

      1. Agreed. There are too many flagpoles in the world for low life journos to run scurrilous ideas to the top which feeds the scandalmonger blogs.
        But that’s ‘net democracy for you.

  3. This is just the leeches at ProView talking trash. If they spread the view that the CEO paid out of his own pocket due to a mistake, it makes them appear to be in the right. Screw them. Don’t believe it.

    The 75m and the 60m are completely unrelated apart from being within 15m of each other.

  4. This is just the leeches at ProView talking trash. If they spread the view that the CEO paid out of his own pocket due to a mistake, it makes them appear to be in the right. Stuff them. Don’t believe it.

    The 75m and the 60m are completely unrelated apart from being within 15m of each other.

Add Your Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.