U.S. Supreme Court denies Psystar’s appeal in Mac clone case

“The U.S. Supreme Court today denied Psystar’s request to review a lower court decision that keeps it from selling computers that run Apple’s OS X but that are not made by Apple,” Josh Lowensohn reports for CNET.

“The decision not to hear the case (PDF) upholds a ruling made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last September that Psystar’s Mac clones violate Apple’s copyrights,” Lowensohn reports.

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: The end. Blessedly.

Related articles:
Apple denied attempt to keep info secret in Psystar case – January 4, 2012
Would-be Mac cloner Psystar may escalate fight with Apple to Supreme Court – October 3, 2011
Judge hammers final nail in Psystar’s coffin, awards Apple key win against Psystar over Mac clones – September 29, 2011
Psystar files legal reply brief in response to Apple – July 29, 2010
Apple v. Psystar: Psystar files opening brief in appeal – May 18, 2010
Psystar files appeal against Apple win – January 18, 2010
Erstwhile ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar halts sales of Rebel EFI Mac cloning tool, will peddle Linux PCs – December 28, 2009
Lawyer: Erstwhile ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar not shutting down – December 20, 2009
Erstwhile ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar pulls plug; ‘shutting things down immediately’ – December 18, 2009
Apple wins permanent injunction against would-be ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar – December 15, 2009
With authorized Mac clones dead, Apple looks to kill off Psystar’s ‘Rebel EFI’ – December 03, 2009
BusinessWeek’s Burrows: Psystar shouldn’t have messed with Apple – December 02, 2009
Psystar agrees to pay Apple $2.7 million settlement over unauthorized Mac cloning – December 01, 2009
Apple, Psystar reach partial settlement to cease sales of unauthorized Mac clones – December 01, 2009
Apple moves to kill second Psystar lawsuit – November 30, 2009
Failure to launch: Would-be ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar sold just 768 PCs with Apple’s Mac OS X installed – November 26, 2009
Apple seeks to grind illegal Mac cloner Psystar into fine silicon dust – November 25, 2009
Apple files motion for permanent injunction to block Psystar from building and selling ‘Mac clones’ – November 24, 2009
Apple wins sweeping victory, crushes would-be ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar in court – November 14, 2009
Meet the Pedraza brothers, the men behind would-be ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar – November 11, 2009
Would-be ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar up to its old tricks, claims it simply bundles software with Mac OS X – November 05, 2009
Would-be ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar asks judge to declare it legitimate – November 02, 2009
Psystar’s Rebel EFI allegedly contains OSS Code covered under Apple Public Source License – October 29, 2009
Psystar expands into selling ‘Mac clone’ software (Rebel EFI) – October 23, 2009
Is Psystar’s real mission to publicize that running Apple’s Mac OS X on generic PCs is possible? – October 17, 2009
Psystar and Apple dispute whether Mac OS X security measures should be kept confidential – October 17, 2009
Would-be ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar ‘happily’ agrees to Mac OS X injunction – October 16, 2009
Apple and would-be ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar file summary judgement requests – October 12, 2009
66 More Related Articles

16 Comments

    1. Pystar didn’t have any technology, amazing or otherwise.

      Any geek can do what they did, a few google searches will show you how.

      What Pystar tried to do is make a business out of it.

      All they had was a business plan, which has now been proven to be illegall.

      Somebody, somewhere knows who funded them, but you can bet all documents linking to them have been destroyed a long time ago.

    2. For those with a poor sense for irony, the above poster is making a joke. The original character wrote his name “rattymouse” and he hasn’t been around for years.

      I kinda wonder who the guy really was. He didn’t post except to say how he loved Psystar machines and that he supported them. Once Psystar quit selling the computers, he disappeared.

      I guess he could’ve been a paid shill, but he didn’t seem eloquent enough for that.

      ——RM

      1. Given the personalities of the folks who seemed to be running Psystar, though, I’d say rattymouse was just their type. Heck, maybe he was even one of them!

      2. It’s still me. I havent posted in a looong time so did not remember how I used to do it. MDN banned me so I lost access to my registered account. Nice going MDN. Afraid of the truth it seems.

        I will always, ALWAYS be a strong supporter of Psystar and their amazing technology. They were true pioneers.

  1. There will never be another Psystar, but this case is only a tiny part of the reason why. If you actually read the case, it is clear that the thing that Psystar did that caused them to lose the case was to sell machines with a retail copy of OSX preinstalled. If, instead, they had sold the identical machine without any OS on it and then gave you instructions to buy your own retail copy of OSX and then instructed you on how to install it, there would be no lawsuit. Indeed, note that Apple has never pursued anyone advocating making a Hackintosh nor any manufacturer of a machine capable of being turned into a Hackintosh. So the real reason that there will never be another Psystar is that Apple no longer sells retail copies of OSX.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.