British broadcaster warns Apple not to brand smart television ‘iTV’ [UPDATED: iTV denies warning Apple]

“ITV has written to Apple to warn the Silicon Valley technology giant off using its three-letter name for its long-awaited, ‘iTV’ smart television. Adam Crozier, chief executive of Britain’s biggest commercial broadcaster, raised the issue with the company when he took the job in 2010, amid expectations that Apple would follow the pattern of branding used for its iPhone and iPad when it eventually cracked television,” Katherine Rushton reports for The Telegraph.

“At the time, ITV, the broadcaster of popular period drama Downton Abbey, received assurances that Apple would not muscle into its territory, at least in the UK,” Rushton reports. “However, insiders fear that the world’s biggest company might take a different stance under Tim Cook, who replaced Steve Jobs as chief executive shortly before Mr Jobs died in August last year.”

Rushton reports, “Apple has never confirmed plans for an ‘iTV’ but expectations that it is preparing to launch one are gathering pace. Last week, a newspaper in Canada reported that the Canadian telecoms company Rogers and Bell has an Apple television in its laboratories, which can be controlled by voice prompts like the iPhone 4S, but can also be controlled by movement, as in Microsoft’s Kinect system.”

Read more in the full article here.

[UPDATE: 11:30am ET: In a statement to The Verge, an ITV spokesperson said that, “The Telegraph’s piece is entirely speculative, and there has been no recent dialogue between ITV and Apple. ITV has no further comment on the matter.” Full article here]

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Readers “Brawndo Drinker” and “Lava_Head_UK” for the heads up.]

Related articles:
Cisco licenses ‘iOS’ trademark to Apple – June 8, 2010
MacDailyNews called Apple’s renaming of iPhone OS to ‘iOS’ in January 2010 – June 7, 2010
RUMOR: Apple to rename iPhone OS to ‘iOS’ (with video) – January 26, 2010
Cisco and Apple reach agreement on ‘iPhone’ trademark – February 21, 2007
Apple and Cisco again extend negotiations on iPhone name – February 16, 2007
Apple, Cisco close in on deal over ‘iPhone’ name – February 01, 2007
Cisco could be on brink of losing iPhone name in Europe – January 13, 2007
Experts: Cisco lost rights to ‘iPhone’ trademark last year – January 12, 2007
Surprise, surprise, surprise: Cisco demos Apple TV-like device – January 12, 2007
Analysts: Cisco ‘iPhone’ trademark suit likely to have little impact on Apple, to be quickly settled – January 12, 2007
iPhone more than a trademark for Apple CEO Steve Jobs – January 11, 2007
Jim Cramer: Why Cisco really sued Apple – January 11, 2007
Cisco General Counsel explains ‘iPhone’ lawsuit; Cicso wanted interoperability with Apple iPhone – January 11, 2007
Apple calls Cisco’s ‘iPhone’ trademark lawsuit ‘silly,’ says ‘very confident we’ll prevail’ – January 11, 2007
Cisco sues Apple for ‘iPhone’ trademark infringement – January 10, 2007
The only thing really wrong with Apple’s iPhone is its name – January 09, 2007
Briefly: Apple changes corporate name; Cisco expects agreement on ‘iPhone’ trademark today – January 09, 2007
Apple debuts iPhone: touchscreen mobile phone + widescreen iPod + Internet communicator – January 09, 2007

44 Comments

  1. Apple know not to and why it isn’t possible. Ever noticed that amongst all the iGadgets, there is one called Apple TV and not iTV ?

    It’s the press that keep talking about iTV because they’re ill-informed.

      1. Well. I’d say it made Mr McCartney, Mr Starkey the estates of Mr Lennon and Harrison a lot of money over the years. So I’d say it worked out pretty good for the pretty much defunct Apple Record company.

        I don’t think Apple will call one of it’s many products iTV for exactly that reason.

  2. Apple would be stupid to call it ‘itv’.

    Itv is an established broadcasting brand that goes back many many years.

    Apple will just be sued and have to renametr device.

    What i suggest is that they call it something less obvious like the naming of iPod and iPad.

    Well how about : I-media, iscreen, iwatch etc

      1. That’s a case of a company selling the rights, then trying to double dip and defraud Apple. If justice prevails, they will not succeed, but who can really say what will happen. It’s a Chinese company on Chinese turf. Facts and fairness might not really matter so much.

    1. Won’t happen. Tens of millions of people in the UK refer to commercial television as ITV. I think Tim has more sense than to try to throw Apple’s weight around concerning a 55-year old business, in a country where that sort of behaviour would generate a shitstorm of bad media.

      1. Why would there be bad press if they came to some sort of Amicable terms and bought the rights to it? They have done this before on numerous occasions. Heck the name of the company was essentially purchased from Beatle’s record label. That was also a British company, no?

      2. Agreed.
        For those of you across the pond and elsewhere, ITV stands for Independent Television. Until its launch in 1955, the BBC was the sole television provider in the UK and is the oldest television domestic service in the world.
        I well remember as a kid having the choice of just two channels. Which was no problem- kids played outside and adults read books, had conversations, went to the pub and contributed to the baby boom.

    1. Should have taken ‘in August’ and placed it behind the “Tim Cook who replaced Steve Jobs as chief executive IN AUGUST before Jobs died last year”.

      I agree, it’s placement make one think Steve passed in August.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.