Could HP turn a profit on defunct Palm’s patents?

“When Hewlett-Packard coughed up $1.2 billion for Palm last spring, the acquisition was widely viewed as a quick way for the company to capture a slice of the increasingly important mobile device market,” John Paczkowski reports for AllThingsD.

“And while the launch of the Veer and the Touchpad proved that true, there was another reason as well: Palm’s intellectual property,” Paczkowski reports. “As former HP CEO Mark Hurd explained a few months after the acquisition: ‘We didn’t buy Palm to be in the smartphone business… we bought it for the IP.'”

Paczkowski reports, “Current HP CEO Léo Apotheker said Thursday the company is considering all its strategic options. But, given the current environment, selling off the Palm patent portfolio is surely at the top of the list… A Palm patent sale could be an easy way for HP to ‘extract value from webOS,’ as Apotheker said.”

Read more in the full article here.
 

6 Comments

  1. This article makes no sense. If Palm’s patents were that valuable, then Palm would have sold for more than the $1.2 billion HP bought it for. Selling the patents by themselves would not turn a profit, but rather mitigate the loss.

  2. Hmmm there is a reson the new Apple data centers have HP Server Gear. I think this is a carefully thought out plan and HP is going to capatlize on a good relationship with Apple. This shake up is great for the industry

    1. Even Apple can only buy so many HP servers for its data centers. That would certainly make Apple a significant customer — enough to cross-license some Palm patents, perhaps, in return for dropping the lawsuit (having already cancelled their mobile device efforts)? Perhaps…that might work out for both sides.

Reader Feedback (You DO NOT need to log in to comment. If not logged in, just provide any name you choose and an email address after typing your comment below)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.