RUMOR: Apple’s FaceTime coming to iPod touch, iPad

“One of our reliable Apple connections (not Jason Burford) just let us know some pretty fantastic news. It’s been widely assumed that Apple will start to roll out their FaceTime real-time communication protocol to more and more of their mobile devices (and possibly their computers), but until now, we’ve been in the dark on how this will actually work,” The Boy Genius reports. “After all, there are no phone numbers to call on an iPod touch or iPad. Here is how we have been told FaceTime will work on non-iPhone devices…”

The Boy Genius reportsIt’s actually pretty simple… Your Apple ID will be registered with your device/s, and that will allow other Apple devices to start a FaceTime call using your email address. Apple will also reportedly make use of push notifications to deliver these incoming FaceTime connection requests as we have been informed there is a push notification detector tied into the FaceTime frameworks in the new iPhone OS 4.1 beta.”

Red more in the full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Chris D.” for the heads up.]

19 Comments

  1. Just bought my iPad last week. If they roll out new iPads with new hardware (retina display, camera) in the next two months I’m going to be really pissed, and Apple will kill early adoption on their products for the foreseeable future.

  2. @FutureMedia:

    You don’t need 5 megapixels for FaceTime. The iPad’s display only shows 1024 x 768 pixels = 786,432 pixels = 0.786 megapixels. Why in the world do you think a 5 megapixel camera would help FaceTime? It would just need to reduce down the number of pixels to get smooth transmission anyway!

    No, having a 5 megapixel camera in the iPad might be nice, but it clearly would be of no help to FaceTime.

    Obviously, though, you are a bit confused about technology, since I had to interpret 5MB pixel cameras to mean “5 megapixel cameras” – I assume you didn’t really mean “5 megabyte pixel cameras,” which is what you actually said. A “5 megabyte pixel” is nonsensical.

  3. Not going to happen this quickly. Don’t worry early adopters. iPad’s won’t get cameras until version 2 in 2011 and iPod touches won’t get these features in September. September 2011 maybe….

  4. I’m always amazed by people that by a tech gadget and then get pissed when it’s updated, regardless of the amount of time before the update. I bought the iPad knowing that it was only a matter of time before it got a camera. If that comes in September it will be annoying but I knew what I bought. I can’t hold that against Apple.

  5. I bet iPod touch will have a front facing camera for FaceTime this Sept release. I am also going out on a limb and guess that a new iPad will be released for Christmas with front-facing camera and a mic for video chatting and voip apps. I just don’t know why early adaptors get so mad when this happens! You know there is always kinks to be worked out of any new device, but you had to be first to have one. If you don’t have the disposable funds to buy one, wait a few months like most people, to make sure of few problems.

  6. I really want to be able to use FaceTime back to my family on iChat

    When I started using an iPhone, I almost stopped taking my MacBook for short trips, but missed our nightly iChats

    I really don’t have anyone with an iPhone that I need to video chat with, but miss seeing the family (especially when the kids are tucked in for the night) and its just my wife and I ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

  7. I don’t think this will happen this year; FaceTime will be reserved for iPhone 4 as an exclusive feature (at least until next year). It’s selling point is that it’s the “video phone call” that people have envisioned since the 1960’s, not “video chat” on a computer. And iPad does not have a built-in camera.

    Apple or a third-party needs to create a Bluetooth camera for iPad. They exist for use with regular computers. That would be a much better way to add a camera to an iPad. Having a built-in camera in the iPad case (facing front or back) would require the user to hold the entire iPad awkwardly with both hand for long periods of time to keep the camera steady and in an appropriate camera-angle position. I don’t think something like that would pass the Steve Jobs usability test. It’s fine on a MacBook or iMac, because the camera is already in a good position and does not move. It’s fine in an iPhone, because the entire device is light and can be held easily with one hand to create the appropriate camera angle. With a Bluetooth (or even a Dock-connector camera on a wire), you can place the camera where you want and not worry about how the iPad is being held or aimed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.