“Open-source campaigners are planning a flood campaign against Apple retail they believe will pressure the iPhone-maker to open up its device,” Aidan Malley reports for AppleInsider.
“In a symbolic gesture, the Free Software Foundation plans a new campaign, nicknamed the Apple Challenge, that it thinks will pressure Apple into opening its software code,” Malley reports.
“The organization is asking supporters to book a Genius Bar appointment at an Apple retail store on Friday or Saturday and ask the technicians questions about the company’s broader corporate policy regarding iPhone 3G and its software under the belief that any copy-protected hardware or software is ‘defective,'” Malley reports.
Full article here.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Sir Gill Bates” for the heads up.]
MacDailyNews Note: Free Software Foundation’s defective questions (with our answers) include:
1. Why do all developers have to submit their applications to Apple before they can be loaded onto an iPhone?
A: So they don’t suck. So they don’t crash everyone’s iPhones. So Apple can offer the best end-user experience with a single, unified, easy-to-use App Store.
2. Why does iTunes still contain so much DRM-laden music?
A: Because the music labels are desperately trying (and failing) to prop up iTunes Store’s “competitors” by colluding to offer them DRM-free music while withholding it from Apple.
3. The iPhone 3G has GPS support. How can users be sure that the GPS cannot be used to track their position, without their permission?
A: Oh, for cripes’ sake. Put on your tinfoil hats, the black helicopters will land any second.
4. If Steve really wants to see free and open formats, why doesn’t the iPhone play Ogg Vorbis, Ogg Theora video and FLAC?
A: MP3 and, its successor, unprotected AAC aren’t open enough? What about Fred’s Audio Codec? Is Apple supposed to support every esoteric audio codec on earth? And, why ask Apple retail store employees a question for Steve Jobs, anyway? Do you really think they’re authorized to speak for the CEO?
5. Why can the iPhone 3G only be activated by Apple and AT&T? In the United States, the Register of Copyrights has ruled that consumers have the right to unlock their phones and switch to a different carrier. How does Apple plan to remedy this discrepancy?
A: In the future, AT&T will offer a no-contract-required option for US$599 (8GB) or $699 (16GB).
If confronted, Apple Store employees should ask the “protestor” a question of their own: “When are you going to get a life?”
“The iPhone 3G has GPS support. How can users be sure that the GPS cannot be used to track their position, without their permission?”
Why exactly does the FSF want to know the answer to this question? What unknown motives or shadowy organizations could they be dealing with who would want access to Apple’s GPS implementation specs? Couldn’t it be possible that the FSF wants this information to to supply to their space alien overlord masters in preparation for the imminent invasion of earth…?
Two can play the paranoid game.
F. S. F. , great initials. They could stand for many words.
F-in’ Silly Freaks.
Go and protest your welfare office, because you obviously don’t work for a living.
Kooks
From the FSF site:
“Currently, many people use proprietary software that denies users these freedoms and benefits. If we make a copy and give it to a friend, if we try to figure out how the program works, if we put a copy on more than one of our own computers in our own home, we could be caught and fined or put in jail. That’s what’s in the fine print of the license agreement you accept when using proprietary software.”
This is where it all falls down. Their theory is that because the idea of free software is a good one, then no one should be able to create commercial software. Proprietary software isn’t something that a company paid people to create for you, it’s something that “denies users… freedoms and benefits”. It’s like saying that when I buy a Mustang, Ford has denied me the freedom and benefit of space flight and time travel.
These same people should be campaigning for an end to copyrights and patents. It’s all the same thing, isn’t it? That way anyone could load your software, change it any way they like, and put it out in to the world with no support or documentation. Wouldn’t that be super?!
Have a problem with your Photoshop silent install for 2,300 seats, and it needs to be done by September 1st? Don’t call me any more! Software is free, man!!! Now you can sit at home and figure out all your problems by your damn self! Need a patch? No worries! Some hippy will jump right on your problem out of the goodness of her heart. Peace, man. Hey, if you miss your deploy, you have a few more days to make Tie Dye. It’s cool.
No one is required to use the app store for your applications. Simply purchase a product other than the iphone, and get your apps wherever you want to.
If you don’t like what Apple has to offer, you are free to spend your money elsewhere.
No one is required to use the app store for your applications. Simply purchase a product other than the iphone, and get your apps wherever you want to.
If you don’t like what Apple has to offer, you are free to spend your money elsewhere.
But I want to use my 1900 pirated songs!
Use your imagination.
info@defectivebydesign.org
This had nothing to do with DRM, it’s all about targeting Apple.
I think Apple should issue Tasers to all of their Geniuses.
I would love to see one of those little FSF assholes thrashing on the floor. I’d be tempted to give them a few kicks in the ribs just for good measure.
My opinion of the FSF has gone down sharply as a result of this nonsense. By engaging in “symbolic” actions like this (which aren’t going to accomplish anything real), they’re making a mockery of themselves and what they stand for.
I strongly believe in open-source development, but the FSF thinks they have the One True Way all open-source should be done. I have no problem with the FSF expressing their viewpoint, but when they start engaging in “symbolic” nonsense like this which disrupts the lives of others, it’s no wonder major companies view open-source development as hippie nonsense and incompatible with the way business works. Thanks a lot, FSF.
Stallman is a crypto-commie whose behavior has limited Linux to a niche that can not coexist with a consumer electronics company. I love Linux as a foil to Microsoft, but Microsoft has suborned Linux by buying into key parts of the Linux supporting infrastructure–such as their deal with Novell–which neutered Suse, one of the best Linux distributions, while threatening other Linux supporters with lawsuits.
Screw these commietards.
Unless someone finds a way to hack it, the user has to allow apps to use CoreLocation data.
Just make your appointments when all these types are destroying property in Denver and St Paul for the political conventions.
The Great Apple Fanboy Massacre,
” Allow me to proceed to systematically destroy your so-called “rebuttals” one-by-one:”
Okay, go ahead.
We’re waiting.
You can begin anytime now.
Come on, we don’t have all day.
Mmmm. Well, it looks like you got nuthin’ bud.
I would give a rather different answer to #4. There aren’t enough Ogg Vorbis users to make it worth doing. The codec may be free, but the effort to bring it up on the iPod, support it, and the space it takes on the device aren’t free.
-jcr
“Ogg Vorbis and FLAC have been around for years “
And their uptake among users is limited to a handful of Linux weenies. Get over yourself.
-jcr
For the record: NO hardware manufacturer wants DRM. It’s expensive to implement, it’s a pain in the ass to support, and it annoys the customers. DRM only exists because the recording industry insists on it.
-jcr
Ask these:
1. When is Apple going to fix Safari for iPhone so it doesn’t crash every other time you use it?
2. When is Apple going to fix OSX for iPhone so it doesn’t bog down to a crawl so often?
5. “In the future, AT&Twill;offer a no-contract-required option for US$599 (8GB) or $699 (16GB).”
…This allows you to use an iPhone without a contract on the AT&T;network. It doesn’t allow you to use the phone with another carrier…
__________________________
Is this really true? I need to know. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again (though I seem to be a solo complainer) No one is a bigger Apple fan than I. Yet I will never buy an iPhone until I can use any carrier. I travel a lot. I have mobile phone numbers (i.e. sim cards) from a dozen different countries so I don’t have to pay exorbitant roaming costs. I need to be able to swap sim cards at will.
“NO hardware manufacturer wants DRM. It’s expensive to implement, it’s a pain in the ass to support, and it annoys the customers. DRM only exists because the recording industry insists on it. “
But in Apple’s case, it benefits them because it creates a lock in. if all those DRM iTunes customers could easily use any MP3 player of their choice, it would be harder for Apple to hold onto that 70% share. the small, already sunk cost of DRM in iPod and iTunes is nothing compared to that upside.
Apple could easily insist on carrying only DRM free music on iTunes. They don’t. The fact that they’re not prepared to back up some expressed abstract desire for a DRM free world with actual concrete action to get there makes their statements on the matter nothing more than standard Steve Jobs RDF Spin.
“And their uptake among users is limited to a handful of Linux weenies. Get over yourself.”
True. But WMA in all it’s forms is widely used and not going away any time soon. So why not support that?
And further why not license FairPlay protected AAC to anyone who wants to build a player to use it? If Apple truly wants to break down those DRM barriers, that’s one thing they could easily do.
But they don’t because they have no desire to support other codecs, or have people move off their formats or into a completely DRM free world, or to allow anyone to play iTMS songs. It’s others who are leading that charge.
Apparently inbreeding is on the rise.
5. Why can the iPhone 3G only be activated by Apple and AT&T;? In the United States, the Register of Copyrights has ruled that consumers have the right to unlock their phones and switch to a different carrier. How does Apple plan to remedy this discrepancy?
Answer: If you don’t like the contract, go buy another phone! No one including Apple or AT&T;is forcing anyone to buy the iPhone.
The main reason Apple won’t sell other file formats, such as OGG is a very important one, and often overlooks. (Thanks to John Gruber for pointing this out.) The main reason is because those formats have questionable technologies in terms of copyright. Apple is afraid to use them because they are vulnerable to copyright lawsuits. The codecs can’t be shown to be free of copyrighted IP. Quicktime is Apple’s format. They’re save using it, and it’s perfectly fine for the quality required.