Apple CEO Steve Jobs questioned in options backdating probe

“Apple Inc. Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs was questioned by government investigators leading the U.S. probe into backdated stock options grants at the company, lawyers familiar with the matter said,” Karen Gullo and Connie Guglielmo report for Bloomberg.

Gullo and Guglielmo report, “Jobs met with officials from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department last week in San Francisco, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the interviews are confidential. Apple said last month an internal review found ‘no misconduct’ by Jobs or current management.”

“The meeting, which took place the same week Apple announced record sales of its best-selling iPod music player, shows the U.S. government is still seeking information about Jobs’s role in the backdating even after the company’s report clearing him and others, said Nell Minow, editor at the Corporate Library, a corporate governance research firm in Portland, Maine,” Gullo and Guglielmo report. ‘It is after all the SEC’s view on his culpability that matters, not the internal investigation at Apple,’ Minow said.”

“The people wouldn’t disclose specifics about what Jobs was asked, what he told investigators and whether there would be additional meetings,” Gullo and Guglielmo report. “Mark Pomerantz, an attorney for Jobs, declined to comment. Luke Macaulay, a spokesman for U.S. Attorney Kevin Ryan, whose office is investigating Apple, declined to comment, as did SEC spokesman John Nester in Washington.”

More details in the full article here.

Related articles:
Lead prosecutor in Apple options investigation leaves fed post to join private law firm – January 22, 2007
US Attorney Kevin Ryan resigns: What it could mean for Apple – January 18, 2007
Steve Jobs worth $20 billion to Apple Inc. – January 17, 2007
Report: Apple axed lawyer who worked on Steve Jobs’ stock-option grant – January 05, 2007
RUMOR: Steve Jobs will take leave of absence from Apple Computer – January 05, 2007
Apple CEO Steve Jobs getting special treatment in options backdating scandal? – January 04, 2007
Could Apple thrive without Steve Jobs? – January 04, 2007
Apple stock-option fallout: investor lawsuit and twin U.S. gov’t investigations – January 04, 2007
WSJ: Steve Jobs, backdating miscreant – January 03, 2007
Should Steve Jobs be allowed to survive Apple’s options backdating scandal? – January 02, 2007
Apple options probe shines spotlight on former execs Anderson and Heinen – January 02, 2007
ThinkEquity analyst: Apple sell-off due to ‘inexperienced traders,’ nothing new in options story – December 28, 2006
Analyst: U.S. Gov’t unlikely to ‘nail Apple and Steve Jobs’ – December 28, 2006
Report: Apple ‘falsified’ records on 7.5m stock options granted to CEO Steve Jobs in 2001 – December 28, 2006
What would Apple be worth without Steve Jobs? – December 27, 2006
Piper Jaffray: Steve Jobs not at risk in stock options case – December 27, 2006
Apple shares push into positive territory, top NASDAQ most-active list – December 27, 2006
Shares of Apple Computer fall 5% in pre-market trading – December 27, 2006
Faked documents may be at core of Apple options probe; Jobs seeks outside legal representation – December 26, 2006
Apple delays filing annual report due to ongoing stock options investigation – December 15, 2006
Options scandal: is Apple’s Steve Jobs truly safe? – October 18, 2006
Apple Computer Directors may have had conflicts of interest in options investigation – October 11, 2006
Apple’s options disclosures leave plenty of unanswered questions – October 09, 2006
Apple shareholders await earnings restatements; Steve Jobs still not in the clear – October 06, 2006
Former CFO Anderson helped turn Apple Computer around – October 05, 2006
Wall Street unshaken by results of Apple stock options investigation – October 05, 2006
Is Apple rotten at the core? – October 05, 2006
Analyst: Anderson, Heinen may be former Apple executives responsible for irregular options grants – October 05, 2006
Analyst: Apple restatement due to options irregularities not expected to be significant – October 04, 2006
Apple’s special committee reports findings of stock option investigation – October 04, 2006
Google CEO declines Apple automatic stock option grant; plans to buy 10,000 AAPL shares instead – September 01, 2006
Google CEO Dr. Eric Schmidt joins Apple’s Board of Directors – August 29, 2006
Shareholders allege Apple execs reaped ‘millions’ in unlawful profits – August 23, 2006
How options-backdating irregularities can affect your Apple Computer stock – August 23, 2006
Apple’s options imbroglio: Mac-maker granted options at or near key events in company’s history – August 18, 2006
Apple added to Nasdaq’s list of ‘delinquent companies’ – August 18, 2006
Apple unlikely to be delisted by NASDAQ – August 16, 2006
Apple CEO Steve Jobs drawn into stock options scandal – August 15, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – August 11, 2006
As expected, Apple delays quarterly results due to stock-options grants review – August 11, 2006
Some stock options grant decisions were made by Apple board, and potentially, CEO Steve Jobs – August 10, 2006
Disney: no material impact from Pixar options – August 09, 2006
Pixar options draw scrutiny – August 08, 2006
Apple stock options scandal? What scandal? – August 07, 2006
Class action lawsuit over stock options filed against Apple Computer, Inc. – August 04, 2006
Wall Street forgiving of Apple’s stock option irregularities; CEO Jobs unlikely to be terminated – August 04, 2006
Apple’s stock option irregularities escalate into a scandal as world awaits Steve Jobs’ WWDC keynote – August 04, 2006
Apple warns of profit restatement dating back to 2002 – August 04, 2006
Apple loses 3.5% to $67.15 in premarket trading – August 04, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – August 03, 2006
Shareholder’s options suit against Apple alleges ‘striking pattern that could not have been chance’ – July 11, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – July 05, 2006
UBS: stock options probe unlikely to hurt Apple – June 30, 2006
Apple joins growing list of companies entangled in stock option ‘irregularities’ – June 29, 2006
Apple to investigate stock option grant ‘irregularities’ made between 1997 and 2001 – June 29, 2006

30 Comments

  1. AAPL gapped lower this morning, primarily on this news. However, AAPL reversed its decline and rose as the broader market rallied. Since then, in early trading, AAPL has slipped back in the red, currently trading around $86.14.

    If AAPL can hold in the $85-$90 range, we should see a technical-driven bounce, given that the stock has fallen by ~10% since January 15th.

  2. ron, no this news story is quite significant. It reminds people that the stock options investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department is still underway and has not been resolved.

    The operative line in the news story is:

    ‘It is after all the SEC’s view on his culpability that matters, not the internal investigation at Apple,’

  3. If Jobs broke the law he should fry. Just because he’s a popular CEO doesn’t mean he should get special treatement.

    Maybe his arrogance has finally caught up to him. I’d like to see him go to jail if he was involved with the option backdating scandal.

  4. upholdthelaw:

    Right on. If he breaks the law, he should get the same treatment as everybody else. It doesn’t matter if he has helped AAPL increase in value.

    Pay the Piper:

    Heh.

    Greg:

    That’s not what you should be worried about. You should be worried that a company you’re invested in may be condoning and covering up (the report clearing Jobs??) illegal behavior.

    Ron:

    The news is that the SEC isn’t biting on Apple’s sham investigation. Imagine if the situation were altered slightly. Do you think the SEC would have accepted the results of Enron’s internal investigation clearing Lay? I think not. Not to imply that Jobs = Lay, but don’t let the fact that you love the company influence your judgment.

  5. If the Great One wiggles out of this, it will be because there’s just enough doubt to cause the prosecutors to believe they can’t win. There’s no question about Steve’s responsibility – he’s the CEO and gets both credit he has not earned and blame he may not fully deserve – although it staggers the imagination to believe he didn’t know what was going on with rather extensive and illegal manipulation of corporate records.

  6. Pay the Pipper:
    It sounds like you know all about being in jail. Are you speaking from your own experiences? Or are you just daydreaming about your own guilty little pleasures. A deviant little shit like you just has to be one of the MS fanboy trolls. Why don’t you go crawl back up Steve Ballmer’s pooper where you came from and play with his Zune collection.

  7. This is good news for Apple, actually, because it means that Steve got a chance to blast the investigators directly with his Reality Distortion Field.

    :: Steve waiving hand mysteriously::
    “This isn’t the CEO you’re looking for”

    :: Investigators, eyes glazing over ::
    “This isn’t the CEO we’re looking for. Move along”

  8. There is no comparison here with Enron. Apple proactively notified the SEC of the irregularities; Enron got caught doctoring the books.

    Besides that, Apple and Jobs are playing ball and talking with the investigators, providing information. The two former Apple attorneys, on the other hand, are not talking to the government, citing fifth amendment concerns.

    Furthermore, what many people don’t seem to grasp is that there were two investigations: An internal probe by Apple, and an independent one (conducted by a former government investigator). Both cleared the current management team.

    And if that wasn’t enough, there’s always the RDF.

    I’d say Steve is in good shape.

    @ Ryan: ROFLOL ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”LOL” style=”border:0;” />

  9. “ron, no this news story is quite significant. It reminds people that the stock options investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department is still underway and has not been resolved.”

    Come on, why still SEC interest. Steve had the Apple board absolve him of all wrongdoing (at least he may or may not have, and that meeting absolving him may or may not have taken place, I guess we’ll never know for sure, the press release could have been forged).

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.