Lead plantiff named in Apple shareholders lawsuit over backdated stock options

“A New York pension system will be the lead plaintiff in a shareholders lawsuit accusing Apple Inc. of securities violations over backdated stock options,” The Associated Press reports.

AP reports, “The New York City Employees Retirement System was named the primary plaintiff in the lawsuit Friday by U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel, according to Grant & Eisenhofer, the law firm representing the group.”

“The pension system, which manages about $89 billion in retirement assets for more than 200,000 municipal employees in New York City, holds about 1 million shares of Apple stock. The institutional investor and other shareholders are seeking class-action status for their case and want damages in connection with what they allege were illegally issued stock options,” AP reports.

“The lawsuit, filed Aug. 24, is now being heard by the same judge who is overseeing a separate but similar securities case that consolidates a number of civil complaints over Apple’s admitted mishandling of stock options accounting,” AP reports. “Apple has not yet legally responded to either case.”

Full article here.

Related articles:
Apple CEO Steve Jobs questioned in options backdating probe – January 23, 2007
Lead prosecutor in Apple options investigation leaves fed post to join private law firm – January 22, 2007
US Attorney Kevin Ryan resigns: What it could mean for Apple – January 18, 2007
Steve Jobs worth $20 billion to Apple Inc. – January 17, 2007
Report: Apple axed lawyer who worked on Steve Jobs’ stock-option grant – January 05, 2007
RUMOR: Steve Jobs will take leave of absence from Apple Computer – January 05, 2007
Apple CEO Steve Jobs getting special treatment in options backdating scandal? – January 04, 2007
Could Apple thrive without Steve Jobs? – January 04, 2007
Apple stock-option fallout: investor lawsuit and twin U.S. gov’t investigations – January 04, 2007
WSJ: Steve Jobs, backdating miscreant – January 03, 2007
Should Steve Jobs be allowed to survive Apple’s options backdating scandal? – January 02, 2007
Apple options probe shines spotlight on former execs Anderson and Heinen – January 02, 2007
ThinkEquity analyst: Apple sell-off due to ‘inexperienced traders,’ nothing new in options story – December 28, 2006
Analyst: U.S. Gov’t unlikely to ‘nail Apple and Steve Jobs’ – December 28, 2006
Report: Apple ‘falsified’ records on 7.5m stock options granted to CEO Steve Jobs in 2001 – December 28, 2006
What would Apple be worth without Steve Jobs? – December 27, 2006
Piper Jaffray: Steve Jobs not at risk in stock options case – December 27, 2006
Apple shares push into positive territory, top NASDAQ most-active list – December 27, 2006
Shares of Apple Computer fall 5% in pre-market trading – December 27, 2006
Faked documents may be at core of Apple options probe; Jobs seeks outside legal representation – December 26, 2006
Apple delays filing annual report due to ongoing stock options investigation – December 15, 2006
Options scandal: is Apple’s Steve Jobs truly safe? – October 18, 2006
Apple Computer Directors may have had conflicts of interest in options investigation – October 11, 2006
Apple’s options disclosures leave plenty of unanswered questions – October 09, 2006
Apple shareholders await earnings restatements; Steve Jobs still not in the clear – October 06, 2006
Former CFO Anderson helped turn Apple Computer around – October 05, 2006
Wall Street unshaken by results of Apple stock options investigation – October 05, 2006
Is Apple rotten at the core? – October 05, 2006
Analyst: Anderson, Heinen may be former Apple executives responsible for irregular options grants – October 05, 2006
Analyst: Apple restatement due to options irregularities not expected to be significant – October 04, 2006
Apple’s special committee reports findings of stock option investigation – October 04, 2006
Google CEO declines Apple automatic stock option grant; plans to buy 10,000 AAPL shares instead – September 01, 2006
Google CEO Dr. Eric Schmidt joins Apple’s Board of Directors – August 29, 2006
Shareholders allege Apple execs reaped ‘millions’ in unlawful profits – August 23, 2006
How options-backdating irregularities can affect your Apple Computer stock – August 23, 2006
Apple’s options imbroglio: Mac-maker granted options at or near key events in company’s history – August 18, 2006
Apple added to Nasdaq’s list of ‘delinquent companies’ – August 18, 2006
Apple unlikely to be delisted by NASDAQ – August 16, 2006
Apple CEO Steve Jobs drawn into stock options scandal – August 15, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – August 11, 2006
As expected, Apple delays quarterly results due to stock-options grants review – August 11, 2006
Some stock options grant decisions were made by Apple board, and potentially, CEO Steve Jobs – August 10, 2006
Disney: no material impact from Pixar options – August 09, 2006
Pixar options draw scrutiny – August 08, 2006
Apple stock options scandal? What scandal? – August 07, 2006
Class action lawsuit over stock options filed against Apple Computer, Inc. – August 04, 2006
Wall Street forgiving of Apple’s stock option irregularities; CEO Jobs unlikely to be terminated – August 04, 2006
Apple’s stock option irregularities escalate into a scandal as world awaits Steve Jobs’ WWDC keynote – August 04, 2006
Apple warns of profit restatement dating back to 2002 – August 04, 2006
Apple loses 3.5% to $67.15 in premarket trading – August 04, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – August 03, 2006
Shareholder’s options suit against Apple alleges ‘striking pattern that could not have been chance’ – July 11, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – July 05, 2006
UBS: stock options probe unlikely to hurt Apple – June 30, 2006
Apple joins growing list of companies entangled in stock option ‘irregularities’ – June 29, 2006
Apple to investigate stock option grant ‘irregularities’ made between 1997 and 2001 – June 29, 2006


  1. Apple has something like 860 shares. If they have 1 million shares worth somewhere over 85million, their portion of the 85 million involved in the backdating issue is significant enough to go after. I just wonder if they asked nicely first. ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”blank stare” style=”border:0;” />

  2. This lawsuit (and others sure to follow) should not be a surprise to anyone following the Apple stock options investigation.

    Once a company admits wrongdoing, it will have to compensate shareholders in the inevitable class-action lawsuit.

    An unfortunate side-effect is that many companies will not concede, in a formal and legal sense, to any wrongdoing, even when it is absolutely clear to any neutral observer that they have.

    One might be inclined to give kudos to Apple that it has admitted wrongdoing and restated previous years’ financial results accordingly.

    But in this case Apple admitted wrongdoing almost certainly because it wanted to head off a criminal investigation (that is still underway) by the SEC and the Justice Department.

  3. Come on ladies and gentlmen, lets get this damn business done, and get it done right the first time, levy fines and other sentences as mandated by the law, and let’s stop conveniently dragging this thing out in slow motion so people will start watching Apple stock fall and we’ll have to start listening to how Apple is going to go under at any moment.

  4. The lawyers are not looking after the pensioner’s best interest. The lawsuit will do nothing but drive the stock down and make the lawyers richer. The retirees in the pension system should sue the lawyers and managers for not protecting the pensioner’s interests.

  5. $84 million dollar charge for back-dated stock options split between 860 million shares….

    We got screwed out of $0.097 per share. Sue them for damages because that 9.7 cents that we all got screwed out of. Why waste your time?

    *DISCLAIMER – Math might be slightly off or rounded

  6. In another leak, Apple sues The New York City Employees Retirement System for publicizing about a frivolous lawsuit that lowered shareholder value by five times more than the actual settlement of their frivolous suit returned to investors.

  7. I suppose that the New York pension system will now have to demonstrate the harm caused their pension fund by Apple’s stock options “irregularities”. That may be difficult, considering that Apple’s rise in stock prices have probably benefited the pension fund significantly. No harm, no foul, right? You can bet that whether or not the NY pension system gets awarded a settlement, the lawyers will get paid nonetheless. Hooray for the lawyers, they win even if they lose!

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.