RUMOR: Apple to take on Microsoft Office, add ‘Lasso’ spreadsheet app to iWork ‘07

“Apple will step on yet another of Microsoft’s toes early next year when the Mac maker unveils the next version of its iWork productivity suite, complete with a new spreadsheet application,” ThinkSecret.com Staff reports for PC Magazine.

“Sources report that iWork ’07 will gain this new third component, code-named Lasso, which will go to bat against Microsoft Excel in the consumer and small-office space. The new application will arrive in addition to the upgraded Pages 3 and Keynote 4 programs, Apple’s current answers to Word and PowerPoint,” ThinkSecret reports. “While Lasso will lack the depth of Excel, Apple expects the software to strike a chord with the many spreadsheet users who don’t require extremely specialized functionality.”

ThinkSecret reports, “Lasso’s function editor will sport more than 200 hundred [MDN Note: we believe they mean 200, not 200,000] functions that will span a number of needs, from financial to statistical and possibly niche applications such as engineering, sources say. Lasso will also feature limited integration with the Internet, making it easy, for example, for users to create a spreadsheet that automatically downloads and inputs updated stock market information at a specified interval. Wrapping such functionality in an attractive, straightforward interface will be Lasso’s strong suit, bringing practical, advanced capabilities to the masses.”

“Lasso will not be the only iWork component for Microsoft to watch. The next upgrade to Apple’s desktop publishing software, Pages 3, is set to receive a number of improvements poised to make the application behave more like a normal word processor,” ThinkSecret reports.

Much more in the full article here.

Related MacDailyNews articles:
Apple on Board with new Microsoft Office Open XML format – October 10, 2006
More details of Apple’s iWork spreadsheet software surface – July 28, 2006
RUMOR: ‘Charts’ spreadsheet software coming to Apple iWork in ‘07 – July 05, 2006
Where’s Apple iWork’s spreadsheet? – February 01, 2006
RUMOR: Apple working on spreadsheet application called ‘Numbers’ for iWork – June 16, 2005
Mac users should not buy Microsoft software (or hardware) – May 16, 2003

47 Comments

  1. ok – to the idiots (with a smirk) who feel they want a database with iWorks, that is what FileMaker Pro is for. um – they are like – um, an Apple subsidiary. but for as much as I do not like microsoft, I do like Office. but then again, Apple would be set to put up a competing product – and the timing is right.

    Apple sits on the board that approves the office document standards that Microsoft develops. by default, office is THE standard for business communications – and this is a good thing. now that it is treated as a standard, other developers/companies are able to develop to that standard and have total inter-operability. before anyone can scream foul and spit venom on how we don’t trust M$ – think about it. M$ has more of a monopoly in the office productivity suite than they do the OS.

    M$ can no longer tinker and tweak and try to make sure other offerings break with office. M$ got what they wanted and painted themselves into a corner. when you strip away the fanatic perspective of M$, their position becomes more clear. the more they become relevent – the less they are relevent. pretty soon M$ will be nothing more than a standards company with revenue coming from licensing only.

  2. Yes, the Visual Basic for Applications component of Office, among other features are required for most businesses. Which eliminates the possibility of most businesses using OpenOffice, ‘Lasso’, or anything other than Microsoft Office. That’s the reality. I doubt if MS is too worried about any home-user or (very)-small-business oriented spreadsheet that Apple or anyone else creates.

    That’s okay though. Apple clearly is going after the home market. It’s all good.

  3. As webbyswim says, I, as well, actually like Office. Both Mac and for Windows. It kills me to say it, believe me, but it is overall a great product. Not perfect, but pretty great. The only product MS has ever even come close to getting right. The rest of their products are garbage.

  4. Pages definitely needs “more better” functionality to be an adequate everyday word processor. It has plenty of bells and whistles but is still missing a few basic nuts and bolts.

    AppleWorks does such a grossly inferior job of rendering screen fonts that it really shouldn’t be mentioned in a serious conversation about modern word processors. Too bad because, except for that one failing, AppleWorks is a really nice little word processor that puts the most-used settings readily at hand instead of burying them in menus.

  5. All very good, but what is Apple’s focus here?

    iWork is fine for those consumers who would by a Mac, but won’t because, “I won’t be able to open all my Office files, unless I shell out more cash for the Mac version of Office.”

    But what about the enterprise? There’s no way that a company is going to accept Mac’s, if the Office replacement only has some of the features of Microsoft Office and ‘lacks the depth of Excel”, it has to 100% compatible or nothing.

    I don’t know why Apple doesn’t re-brand NeoOffice, make it more Mac like and install this for free on all new Mac’s. They could still work on iWork, as I don’t see one grabbing sales from the other, they’re 2 different products.

    NeoOffice/OpenOffice: a workhorse app, 100% compatible with Office that has no frills and gets the job done.

    iWork: a hybrid Office/Page Layout application that is useful for documents that need more flair and design.

    I’m ‘trying’ to give up on Office, and have moved to NeoOffice in the short term to see if it is feasible. My company has started to accept OpenOffice on their Windows PC’s in order to cut costs, but it’s gonna be tough because Excel (I grudgingly accept) is unsurpassable.

  6. iWork documents ARE COMPATIBLE with Office and visa versa! It will be even more the case with the new XML standard files.

    Pages is a great word processor with infinitely better layout capabilities than Word. I produce newsletters, brochures, invoices, labels, letters etc etc and it’s really a joy to use.

    “Lasso”, if it does all the straightforward things will appeal to 90% of Excel users. Most of us use about 10% of that of the funtionality of Excel.

    Database: I am surprised that Apple hasn’t already released a FileMaker Lite version that can be a straightforward, simple database which again is what 90% of Access users want. None of the fancy shit, just the really sound basics.

    So we then have the Apple Mac Office Suite….go Apple!

    And my goal is: NEVER will I spend another centime with Microsoft.

  7. @ confounded.

    “I’m still trying to work out to put lines across a page in Pages. Anyone know how to do this? In Mellel it’s dead easy but in Pages I’m stuck.”

    Are you for real?

    Insert Shape, Line. Bingo.

  8. The slice of pie is big enough for Apple to have a small piece, but compatibility is very important. Pages claims compatibility with Word files, but it does not display it exactly as Word does, even after putting in the exact specs in the inspector that Word has.

  9. As a Mac fan I hope it all works out, but Apple’s track record with apps like Pages and Keynote brings back memories of Appleworks and Filemaker. Of course FM went on to be big business, but not for Apple. I guess my point is, if they’re going to break the starting gate open I hope their intention is to stick with it for the long term. I’d like to see some demonstration that they have a financial and personnel commitment indicating a long term goal for these types of products.

    In the meantime I think I’ll go ahead and Mariner’s office suite.

  10. Some people think that FileMaker Pro increased their prices ($299 now, $99 at one point in the past) simply because it was viewed as simply being too cheap for a “real” (many-to-many relational) database. They may be in a quandary about this — make the proposed FileMaker Express a flat-file database program, and it’s not the same as Access; make it fully relational and what do you cut out of the “lite” version that’s not in the full version?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.