Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple closing arguments; judge’s ruling due toward end of April

“Apple Corps Ltd. executives did not object to names and logos now under dispute when they were shown an Apple Computer Inc. iTunes Music Store demonstration four months before the public service launched, an Apple Computer attorney said Wednesday during closing arguments in a trademark dispute,” Jeremy Kirk reports for IDG News Service. “The legal wrangling pits Apple Corps, The Beatles’ record label, against Apple Computer. A logo depicting an apple with a bite out of it is at the center of the disagreement. Following closing arguments in the High Court in London, the case will go to Justice Edward Mann, who will decide whether to grant an injunction barring Apple Computer from using the logo for the iTunes Music Store. Justice Mann said as the hearing closed Wednesday that he would probably issue his ruling toward the end of the month, not before the Easter weekend in the U.K. starting April 15.”

“Apple Corps attorney Geoffrey Vos charged that the computer company was a ‘Johnny-come-lately’ to the Apple name, and has deliberately trespassed on a registered trademark. ‘Apple Computer has been trying to take more and more away from us,’ Vos said… Apple Computer has in part deflected the charges by finely describing how its bite-marked apple logo disappears during purchases from the iTunes Music Store. The logo is only used to advertise the iTunes service, not the content, Apple Computer has argued,” Kirk reports. “A ruling against Apple Computer could mean the company would have to change the way its logo is presented in relation to the iTunes application and Music Store. Apple Corps would likely then pursue damages.”

Full article here.

Advertisements:
Apple’s brand new iPod Hi-Fi speaker system. Home stereo. Reinvented. Available now for $349 with free shipping.
Apple’s new Mac mini. Intel Core, up to 4 times faster. Starting at just $599. Free shipping.
MacBook Pro. The first Mac notebook built upon Intel Core Duo with iLife ’06, Front Row and built-in iSight. Starting at $1999. Free shipping.
iMac. Twice as amazing — Intel Core Duo, iLife ’06, Front Row media experience, Apple Remote, built-in iSight. Starting at $1299. Free shipping.
iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.
iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.

Related articles:
Apple vs. Apple likely be in judge’s hands by Wednesday – April 03, 2006
Apple lawyer: ‘Even a moron in a hurry’ can tell difference between iTunes and Beatles’ Apple Corps – March 30, 2006
Apple vs. Apple opening arguments begin in UK High Court – March 29, 2006
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple goes to UK High Court this Wednesday – March 26, 2006
Apple Computer and The Beatles’ AppleCorp should stop fighting in court and work together instead – July 27, 2005
Beatles vs. Apple Computer: outcome is far from a lock for Beatles – September 30, 2004
Apple vs. Apple settlement to result in iTunes Music Store Beatles exclusive? – September 23, 2004
Apple’s iTunes Music Store to land exclusive Beatles deal? – September 20, 2004
Apple vs. Beatles could be solved with fat check and spinning off iTunes from Apple Computer – September 17, 2004
Apple’s settlement with Beatles could be ‘biggest settlement in legal history’ – September 13, 2004
The Beatles to sell songs via Apple iTunes Music Store? – June 09, 2004
Apple loses: Apple v. Beatles to be heard in Britain – April 06, 2004
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple; 1991 agreement allows for ‘data transmission services, even music’ – February 26, 2004
Apple Computer to contest Beatles’ U.K. lawsuit in court today – February 25, 2004
Jobs: Apple vs. Apple ‘could drag on for years – it’s unfortunate because we love the Beatles’ – September 28, 2003
Forbes: Apple vs. Apple; iTunes Music Store just might end up with exclusive Beatles deal – September 12, 2003
Sosumi: more on the Beatles’ lawsuit against Apple Computer, Inc. – September 12, 2003
The Beatles sue Apple Computer over iPod, iTunes – September 12, 2003
The Beatles’ Apple Records could be gearing up for fight with Apple Computer – August 12, 2003
The Beatles gearing up for a fight over Apple’s iTunes Music Store – June 03, 2003

33 Comments

  1. Hey pog and Eschew Obfuscation, you’re both FUD spreaders. Ironically, just like Apple Corps.

    Learn to look beyond the first bloody definition you find in your overly-limited dictionary. Dimwits. (And yaah, that word’s in the dictionary, too!)

    HERE, THIS IS JUST FOR YOU TWO:

    From Merriam-Webster online:

    pedantic

    One entry found for pedantic.
    Main Entry: pe·dan·tic
    Pronunciation: pi-‘dan-tik
    Function: adjective
    1 : of, relating to, or being a pedant
    2 : narrowly, stodgily, and often ostentatiously learned
    3 : UNIMAGINATIVE, PEDESTRIAN
    – pe·dan·ti·cal·ly /-‘dan-ti-k(&-)lE/ adverb

    http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/pedantic

  2. > ‘Apple Computer has been trying to take more and more away from us,’
    > Vos said…

    How can anyone say that with a straight face? Apple Computer isn’t taking anything away from Apple Corps. Apple Corps is just an organization of high paid executives who seek to extort money from others.

    The Beatles should outright repudiate this moronic lawsuit.

  3. Turdburg, you’re totally right.

    Apple Corpse has carefully avoided the online distribution of Beatles tunes and none of the Beatle catalog is in iTunes. Unless the wheezing Corpse has shown they were going to open a store of their own, Apple Computer is not taking anything away from them. If Apple Computer were selling CDs or owned content, that would be different. But they do no do either.

    “”Johnny-come-lately”
    yeah, like only 30 fuckin’ yrs ago…a whole 8 years after the decomposing Corpse belched its first undead breath.

    “playing TV commercials featuring music on the iTunes Music Store.”
    OHHHHH! I didn’t know there was music in an advert for iTunes! I totally changed my mind!

    “Analysts say record labels receive the lion’s share of sales of albums and songs, with most of the remainder expended by Apple Computer for the service’s overhead.”
    I believe many of us have been saying this – is the putrid Corpse would put their (your adjective here) music on iTunes Music Store, they would make a lot of $.

Reader Feedback (You DO NOT need to log in to comment. If not logged in, just provide any name you choose and an email address after typing your comment below)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.