Charles Bermant writes an article that is undefinable for the Seattle Times entitled, “Apple ahead of pack in eliminating spam.” Mistakenly reporting that Mac OS X’s Mail app’s Junk Mail Filter is “part of the operating system,” and alternating statements like, “the strength of OS X’s spam-filtering ability is proprietary technology, something called ‘adaptive latent semantic analysis'” with, “a user of Eudora for the Mac will have to downgrade their mail client as they upgrade the operating system,” renders this article one of the most incomprehensible pieces in recent memory. We think the article is complimentary, ultimately, but comparing Outlook to BMW and Mail to Yugo and then praising Mail’s abilities, leaves us somewhat perplexed as to the what the writer is trying to say about Mail. If you can understand this, please let us know what the author’s trying to say.
Previous Post
Apple leads; Wintel follows as usualApple Watch Veterans Day Activity Challenge coming November 11th
Apple is set to launch its annual Veterans Day Activity Challenge for Apple Watch users on November 11, 2026…
T. Rowe Price’s Tony Wang: Apple proves consumer demand remains resilient amid AI-driven margin pressures
T. Rowe Price portfolio manager Tony Wang (who oversees the firm’s science and technology equity strategy) argues that Apple’s latest results…
iPad mini 8 outperforms Apple’s claims, delivers more than all-day battery life – Tom’s Guide
Apple’s iPad mini gets its biggest upgrade yet with a thinner, lighter design and a vibrant 8.5-inch tandem OLED display — the first for the…
Apple’s iPhone Duo to grab significant share foldable smartphone market – Trendforce
Apple’s first foldable smartphone, the iPhone Duo, is generating strong early demand according to a new analysis from market research firm…
Apple warns German politicians of targeted iPhone spyware attacks
Apple has issued threat notifications to members of Germany’s Bundestag and federal gov’t officials, alerting them that their iPhones may…