“Apple first sued Samsung in 2011 for copying the design of the iPhone, kicking off a winding trail of countersuits, trials, and appeals, including a stop at the Supreme Court in 2016,” Nicas reports. “Apple initially sought to block Samsung phones from the market, but the technology at dispute has long been outdated, and the fight has since largely been about money. ”
“‘And if I had to characterize it, it didn’t really accomplish anything,’ said Brian J. Love, a Santa Clara University law professor who tracked the case. ‘Close to a decade of litigation, hundreds of millions of dollars spent on lawyers, and at the end of the day, no products went off the market,'” Nicas reports. “Apple won on paper, but it failed in its goal to gain a competitive advantage over Samsung and other phone makers in its series of lawsuits against them, said Mr. Love and Michael A. Carrier, a professor at Rutgers Law School who studies patent law.”
“After years of legal fees and countless hours of its executives’ time, Apple walked away with negligible profits on the cases,” Nicas reports. “For other companies, the case is likely to serve as a lesson that ‘the courtroom is not always the place to try to get ahead,’ Mr. Carrier said. ‘There’s always the trade-off between litigation and innovation, and in the time these companies spent in the courtroom, they weren’t innovating.'”
MacDailyNews Take: That’s obviously wrong, in Apple’s case for sure. Plenty of iPhone and iOS innovations have arisen since Apple took slavish copier Samsung to court in 2011.
“An Apple spokesman, Josh Rosenstock, referred to a previous company statement that said the “case has always been about more than money,'” Nicas reports. “‘Apple ignited the smartphone revolution with iPhone and it is a fact that Samsung blatantly copied our design,’ Apple said in the statement. ‘It is important that we continue to protect the hard work and innovation of so many people at Apple.'”
Read more in the full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: The leagl action undertaken by Apple likely cause many a potential iPhone knockoff peddler to reconsider infringing Apple’s IP. We’ll never know how many, or to what extent, Apple’s vigorous and unrelenting legal actions to protect their IP against Samsung’s blatant theft quelled other prospective copiers, but it’s likely substantial.
Hopefully, the settlement contains some strong anti-copying terms that will serve to prevent the slavish copier from doing
businesstheivery as usual going forward.
Apple’s products came first, then Samsung’s:
Here’s what Google’s Android looked like before and after Apple’s iPhone:
And, here’s what cellphones looked like before and after Apple’s iPhone:
People who buy Android phones and tablets reward thieves.
Apple, Samsung settle U.S. patent dispute – June 27, 2018
Steve Jobs: ‘I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product; I’m willing to go thermonuclear war on this’ – October 20, 2011