“This is not just a minor scheduling issue. This has the potential to affect the probability of Samsung being allowed again to sell tablets in the United States that look very much like the iPad, not just this Christmas Selling Season but also beyond, at least until the appeals court decides,” Mueller reports. “And looking beyond this matter, it highlights the equal-treatment dilemma that has been plaguing this California lawsuit for some time, especially recently.”
Mueller reports, “Just like Samsung previously (and successfully) argued that there should be an adverse inference jury instruction against both parties, or against neither one, Apple now demands equal treatment as well. Apple argues that ‘[its] motion for injunctive relief is more urgent than Samsung’s request to dissolve the [Galaxy Tab 10.1] injunction,’ but in any event, “Samsung’s motion certainly should not be addressed before Apple’s motion for injunctive relief”. In other words, if Apple doesn’t get a new injunction in time for the Christmas Selling Season, it at least wants the existing one to stay in place.”
Read more in the full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: Lucy will respond just as soon as she finishes up her race against that glacier.
Koh sets December 6 court date to consider permanent injunction against Samsung smartphones – August 29, 2012
Judge Lucy Koh grants Samsung a major breakthrough in Apple v. Samsung trial – August 20, 2012
Apple’s biggest enemy in smartphone wars: Molasses-like legal systems – June 13, 2012