FOX News Podcasts+ launches exclusively on Apple Podcasts

29 Comments

1. FOX News has been corrupted. It’s a front for globalist establishment leftists who pretend to be “conservative.”

   James and Kathryn Murdoch exposed as left-wing mega-donors

   Reply

   1. She got fired after she went off script on the air live to attack her employer for exercising its editorial judgment rather than letting her broadcast whatever she pleased. I cannot imagine where these right-wing nutjobs get the idea that the principle of free speech and/or the First Amendment gives them the right to hijack somebody else’s property to broadcast a message that the property owner does not wish to broadcast. In what world ever did reporters have a right to publish a story in a newspaper or other media outlet over the objections of its editor and publisher? It is hardly a surprise that her bosses would not tolerate a public attack on their integrity from somebody who stole their airtime to broadcast it.

      Reply

      1. But when it’s done a liberal news outlet it’s ok. Heck they even take perverts back.

         Reply

         1. Are you talking about the guy who was yanking his tubin?

         2. Yes, he has a lot of pull at CNN…

      2. “In what world ever did reporters have a right to publish a story in a newspaper or other media outlet…”

         I remember when (back in the olden days) reporters would publish the story no matter what it was, and as long as the reporters could back it up, and editors would stand back and let shilt happen. Those days are long gone.

         Reply

         1. “As long as the reporters could back it up.” Whether that is true is the editors’ call, not the reporters’. The editors and publishers are the ones who have the deep pockets to pay the legal fees and damages if there is a suit for defamation.

         2. Txloser, so gullible he still believes the libturd BS about the virus

         3. George, the conservaturd, opens his mouth only to change feet.

         4. skellum, libturds like you are called libturds because you have shit for brains

            Proof is voting for a corrupt, racist dementia patient and a whore. Only a fucking idiot would do so.

         5. ” Whether that is true is the editors’ call, not the reporters’.”

            You mean like Trump colluding with the Russians?

         6. No. The Russia thing was a case where the reporters, the editors, and the evidence all agreed. I am speaking of cases where the editor is convinced that there is insufficient evidence to run the story. They are paid to make those decisions. The reporters have no legal right to overrule them.

      3. I guess it depends on what is the nature of the information she has. How come if the whistle blower is pro left they are a hero but the same whistle blower is pro right she is a nut job. You do realize your a sale out who only cars about partisan power. Maybe you should suspend judgement of her intention until you see what information she has. Maybe she is a wack nut job but maybe she is a hero willing to risk all to expose criminal injustice.

         Reply

         1. I don’t care what information she has—left, right, or center. That is not the issue.

            If she has newsworthy information about Channel 26, there are 16 other TV stations in the Houston market that would be more than glad to carry bad news about a competitor. That doesn’t even count 44 subchannels, 51 FM stations, 32 AM stations, 24 newspapers, and countless websites, podcasts, cable channels, YouTube channels, etc. If she has information about a crime, Harris County has at least 52 law enforcement agencies where she can report it.

            The woman has an absolute right to tell her story. She just doesn’t have a right to force Channel 26 to let her tell it on their station and make them pay her for it.

         2. Absolutely not!

            Unless she owns the station airing her report while assuming liability, she has no right to ANYTHING.

            Obvious you are applying Leftist standards to a media world you do not understand. There, I fixed it for you…

         3. If you understand that Channel 26 in Houston has a right to control the content it airs, both because of its own First Amendment rights and because of its potential liability for false content, why do you have so much trouble agreeing that Facebook and Twitter have the same right to control the content they spread?

         4. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/07/01/trump-organization-indictment-donald-trump-497717

            Learn to read, goeb.

         5. #include absolutely correct.

            Pro Left whistleblowers are widely heralded and treated as decorated heroes winning major awards if they work in the media. Pro Right whistleblowers are routinely marginalized, mocked, IGNORED and typically don’t stand a chance winning a Leftist media award.

            To prove the point, on queue TxUseless righteous defender of Leftist hypocrisy, promoter of double standards and free speech Professor, posted:

            “I cannot imagine where these right-wing nutjobs get the idea that the principle of free speech and/or the First Amendment gives them the right”

            To be expected from a Leftist cultist preacher every time hypocrisy and double standards replaces credibility…

         6. Left-wing nut jobs certainly exist, but Ivory Hecker and the Veritas Project aren’t among them. We were talking about them, not some hypothetical in which a liberal reporter went rogue on air to attack her employer and acted shocked when she was fired for it. I would have reacted to that situation exactly the same way.

            For example, I deplore the apparent effort by NBC to suppress Rowan Farrow’s reporting on Harvey Weinstein, but I applaud his response to it. He didn’t interrupt NBC programming to insert his own message. He quit and released the story on another media outlet. Ms. Hecker could have done the same. Houston isn’t a one-horse town. It is the fourth-largest city in the country and has hundreds of media outlets, most of which would have enthusiastically promoted a negative story about one of their competitors.

            To repeat, Ivory Hecker’s First Amendment right to free speech, like Rowan Farrow’s right to free speech, does not include the right to force a particular media outlet to air their message—whether left, right, or neutral—as the reporter sees fit.

2. No libturds will watch. Too many facts

   Reply

   1. Conservaturds do not like to be confused by facts or the truth.

      Reply

      1. To anger a conservative tell a lie
         To anger a libturd tell the truth

         Reply

      2. Typical libturd. Too stupid to know how stupid you are

         Reply

3. Funny to watch fucking idiot libturds try to make an insult. They are like slinkies. Good for nothing but fun to watch fall down the stairs

   Reply

   1. Oh, oh, lots of libturds got their panties in a bunch on this one!!

      Reply

4. Sad how many libturds have infected this site

   Reply

   1. Six posts in a row just yelling “libturds” with no other content, and you think libturds are the infestation.

      Reply

      1. Apparently, you need to reread the posts above on libturds. Read several times as you need to be reminded often.

         Reply

      2. Pissing off libturds is both fun and a public service. Their scorn is well deserved

         Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.