Parler CEO invited to U.S. House’s antitrust investigation into Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google

U.S. representatives Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.) asked the head of upstart social media service Parler to weigh in ahead of an antitrust hearing with several top tech companies.

The lawmakers sent a letter on Wednesday afternoon to Parler CEO John Matze asking him to weigh in on “the state of competition in social media.”

Parler logo
Parler logo
Betsy Woodruff Swan for Politico:

“Parler differentiates itself on the quality and features of its platform— namely, its commitment to not ‘censor or editorialize, share or sell user data,’” the lawmakers wrote. “This commitment positions Parler in stark contrast to Twitter, which has made increasingly clear in recent weeks and months that only users who refrain from expressing certain unfavored political beliefs are welcome to fully participate on its platform. In turn, Parler’s commitment to free expression takes the place of price as an incentive driving consumer behavior.”

On the same day, the two representatives sent a letter to Twitter’s CEO asking for a host of materials, including explanations of all moderating decisions made in the U.S. over the last year. They also asked for all of Twitter’s internal communications about the decision to fact-check one of President Donald Trump’s tweets and apply a warning to another.

Parler bills itself as something of a free speech alternative to Twitter, and a number of prominent conservatives –– including Rep. Devin Nunes and Sen. Ted Cruz –– have opened profiles on the site and promoted it to their Twitter followers.

The Republicans’ requests come as the date nears for the House Judiciary Committee’s antitrust panel hearing with the CEOs of Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google parent company Alphabet.

MacDailyNews Take: Besides Matze’s participation, this may prove to be an interesting hearing regarding which companies are actually in violation of antitrust law and which are not. Apple should have nothing to fear, unlike Alphabet’s Google.


    1. Actually companies have every right to censor what people post. Free speech is only required from the government. Congress shall pass no law abridging freedom of speech among other things. Has nothing to do with Facebook. Read the constitution every now and then. It’s interesting! Black people are 3/5 of a person in there!! Haha

      1. You can censor all you like on your own property. The Facebook network is it the property of Facebook.

        What hasn’t happened, but should, is Facebook be held liable for all the libel already on their servers.

        Alternatively, the can be deemed a common carrier and then each user would be individually liable.

  1. Totally agree I left Facebook and Twitter for their censorship of free speech and I’ve joined Parlor and I love it not one message I’ve sent has ever been censored what a welcome change

    1. And that’s the way it should be! You should be able to use your device as you wish. Apple prevents that through the single App Store. Apple is TOTALLY censoring.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.