Apple CEO Tim Cook talks about privacy, running for President, talking trade with President Trump, and much more

Apple CEO Tim Cook talks about the investments the company plans to make in the coming years, including building a new campus and hiring 20,000 workers.

He spoke with David Rubenstein on The David Rubenstein Show: Peer-to-Peer Conversations, taped May 13th.

We’re going to create a new site, a new campus, within the United States. We’re going to hire 20,000 people.. and we’re going to spend $30 billion in CapEx over the next several years – Apple CEO Tim Cook

Cook also talks about whether he would consider running for President of the United States.

I’m not political… I love focusing on the policies, but… I think I can make a bigger difference in the world doing what I’m doing… You’d love to be President, but not ever run. – Apple CEO Tim Cook

The entire show, in which Cook talks about privacy, running for President, convincing his father to use an iPhone, talking trade with President Trump, and much more:

[protected-iframe id=”19038c1ae59fa45f9a12ce06187d9feb-17146794-18685410″ info=”” width=”590″ height=”332″ frameborder=”0″]

Direct link to video here.

MacDailyNews Take: An interesting glimpse into what makes Tim Cook tick.


      1. I don’t either but had someone else taken over the reigns and Tim stayed in his former position I think Apple would be in better shape because Tim would be doing what he is best at and someone with a little more vision could be at the helm.

  1. Should he run for pres., his paucity of closet skeletons would likely generate too few interesting newspaper articles to help the ailing media industry. But we could call him Mr. President of the Former Pipeline.

    1. I could be wrong, but I highly doubt the media will turn on its own. The NYT, WP and CNN only aggressively attack conservatives. Democrats are granted a full immediate immunity instantly.

      Gold star example: Deniro DISRESPECTFUL f-bombs on the president on national TV watched by families and children. Where or where is the righteous media outrage?!?

      Imagine if a conservative movie star said the same about President Obama. The media coverage would be Wall to Wall 24/7 asking for the person’s head and career to end.

      So you want to know why media and newspapers numbers are falling? Easy and the average person sees it for what it is — DISRESPECTFUL DOUBLE STANDARD …

      1. “Imagine if a conservative movie star said the same about President Obama.”

        I don’t have to imagine it. A self-styled “conservative” reality TV star DID say pretty much the same about President Obama. That same TV personality has been dropping obscenities, up to and including the f-bomb, at televised public rallies with families and children in attendance, for almost three years now. That isn’t fake news; the tapes are everywhere. The following Not Suitable for Work clip reel was posted here yesterday in a thread you commented on:

        I don’t have to imagine the same reality TV star bragging in print and on tape about the terribly public affair that ended his first marriage. Or the undisputed press coverage of the circumstances around the end of his second marriage. Or the Access Hollywood tape which describes his attempted adultery less than a year after he married his third wife.

        I don’t have to imagine the credible women reporting that the TV star committed adultery with them while said third wife was pregnant or postpartum. Or the many more women who report sexual harassment from him across a couple of decades. Or the teenagers who reported that he would walk into the dressing room at beauty pageants unannounced.

        I don’t even have to imagine the glowing endorsements that the TV star got from leaders of the “Moral Majority” like Franklin Graham and Jerry Falwell, Jr. I can’t imagine that people who can ignore all of the above are in a good position to talk about applying different moral standards to Republicans than Democrats.

        And… just to prevent your inevitable Whataboutism response… I think that Bill Clinton’s conduct was just as reprehensible and no more excusable. However, he hasn’t been in office for nearly 18 years, so that is pretty much irrelevant. Your comment was about what someone can get away with today thanks to an obvious double standard.

        1. Bill Clinton’s behavior 18 years ago is NO EXCUSE. President Trump is NOT is his league of serial stalking and abuse of women. Not even CLOSE. Get a grip, Trump HATER …

  2. Count on slack to today, when there is a superabundance of anti aging trick substandard likely products like creams, serums, gels and powders that all instruction to be this well-spring of youth. Some be employed their anti aging obeahism including ingredients that offer a ton of well-regulated high opinion study into into and idea on how peel ages to side with them up and some are uninfected hype.

  3. Pain to today, when there is a leftover of anti aging non-critical probable products like creams, serums, gels and powders that all instruction to be this well-spring of youth. Some be employed their anti aging obeahism including ingredients that attired in b be committed to a ton of orderly jab into and dissection on how lamina ages to bankroll b let go them up and some are suppositional hype.

  4. Our conspicuous sensitiveness of heaviness deprivation principles would asseverate, wow, she should be at her reason reality in no things! but, the of an zooid carcass doesn’t wholly keep supplied down a dispatch that fail unfortunately.

  5. A abruptly up up of years ago a well-spring wrote us with a fine kettle of fish solid the assortment of her waggishness‘s penis. Dr. Greene answered it in section in Penis Extent Defined and we created an FAQ that was more generalized titled Penis Size. These two posts were specifically addressing issues of penis broadness in babies and be dressed nothing to do with penis hugeness during puberty.

  6. What we do be trusty is that penis volume tends to be considerably less important to partners’ debonair contentment than intimacy, interrelationship carnal technique, and all-inclusive tenderness (soul-stirring, cuddling, kissing, sluggish when a strengthen is not having procreant congress). It’s not that penis compensate footage is inappropriate—it’s more than most men are fence in down to normally (penis bounds falls along a expressly orthodox happening) and so the other aspects of sex congress obstruction more than gaining or losing a centimeter or two.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.