Why my next MacBook Pro will likely be worse than my current one

“Regular readers will know that I still have a 17-inch MacBook Pro as my main computer,” Ben Lovejoy writes for 9to5Mac. “It’s almost five years old now, which is a relatively long time in Mac terms, and an absolute age for someone who usually does poorly when it comes to resisting shiny new tech.”

“Two years ago, I still hadn’t entirely given up hope on Apple reintroducing a 17-incher,” Lovejoy writes. “Two years on, that hope has pretty much dwindled away. Given that Apple managed to create a 5K 27-inch iMac at a relatively affordable price, it’s clear that making a 17-inch Retina display wouldn’t be a problem – but Apple still hasn’t launched one.”

“One thing is now certain: I’m never again going to be able to buy a MacBook with the same degree of upgradability as my classic MacBook Pro,” Lovejoy writes. “Whatever RAM I opt for when I buy it, that’s all the RAM it will ever have.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: A long time ago, we used to have 17-inch MacBook Pros that we lugged around and also docked into larger monitors, drive arrays, keyboards, mice, etc. at our desks. It was the worst of both worlds. Back-breaking “portability” and underpowered desktops.

Our way of looking at it today: You buy a portable Mac for – ahemportability and you spec your desktop Mac for as much performance as possible. As always, max out the RAM in both if your budget allows. That’s why we have 27-inch iMacs (dual displays) on our desks and 11-inch MacBook Airs (still waiting to see what Apple releases in portable Macs this year before upgrading – likely to 12-inch MacBooks). With macOS’s Continuity features, pretty much everything is in sync between both machines, so they act as one.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.