How many iPhones did Apple sell last quarter?

“A funny thing happened on the way to the so-called ‘tough comp’ — the challenge Apple was expected to face improving on the record set in the last three months of 2014 by runaway sales of the iPhone 6,” Philip Elmer-DeWitt reports for Fortune.

“What happened? The goal post got moved,” P.E.D. reports. “After Tim Cook assured analysts in October that Apple was on track to beat that 74.5 million record, investor anxiety shifted to the March quarter, where last year’s post-Christmas sale of 61.2 million iPhones seemed even farther out of reach.”

“But first things first. Apple will release those long-feared December quarter result in two weeks, and there is still the possibility of a surprise in either direction,” P.E.D. reports. “Among the 32 Apple analysts we’ve heard from so far—24 Wall Street professionals and eight veteran amateurs—all but four are taking Tim Cook at his word. The average unit sales estimate has fallen somewhat since we polled the group in October — to 76.5 million from 78 million — and expected year-over-year growth has shrunk accordingly (to 2.8% from 4.7%). But only four analysts polled think Apple is going to come up short of its 74.5 million record.”

Read more, and see all of the individual analysts’ iPhone unit sales estimates, in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Yet another all-time quarterly iPhone unit sales record looms.

One thing is for sure: All eyes will be on Apple’s guidance for Q216.

SEE ALSO:
Apple to release Q116 earnings, webcast live conference call on January 26th – January 5, 2016

4 Comments

  1. Since Apple can blow away all records and still get punished in the lottery — errrr stock market, I’d like to see ANALysts keep lowering their estimates for the holiday quarter over the next two weeks.

    Hey ANALysts, how does only 62 million iPhones sold sound to you? Sounds like a great ANALyst estimate to me!

  2. Whether the sales are up or down; analysts have constantly been disappointed in Apple. My sources tell me, 83.25% of these analysts have been tested positive for heavy drug usage. They are not to be taken seriously and suffer from this need to be heard. Nothing new here folks, pass on by.

    1. Ongoing drug usage causes brain damage.

      Apparently ANALysts get paid no matter how inaccurate they are – how about an ongoing statistic as to accuracy before I believe another word but that is the real game right? The ends justify the means…

      Please don’t even get me started on weather forecasters … Just record every possibility & say “it may” & be done with it… In fact just have both groups merge for all the “real life”events actually that are being illustrated…

Add Your Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.