Slavish Apple copier Samsung announces rose gold Galaxy Note 5

“We can’t even imagine the conversations that are taking place in Apple’s offices on Thursday,” Zach Epstein reports for BGR.

“First a huge leak revealed the upcoming new HTC One A9, which is far and away the most shameless iPhone copy the world has ever seen outside of the Goophone,” Epstein reports. “Not to be left out, Samsung just announced that its flagship Galaxy Note 5 will soon be available in two new colors: Silver and, you guessed it, rose gold.”

“Samsung has apparently taken notice of the color’s popularity, especially in the APAC region, because it just cooked up its own version,” Epstein reports. “Beginning on October 23rd in South Korea, the Galaxy Note 5 phablet will be available for purchase in ‘Silver Titanium’ and ‘Pink Gold,’ which is a spitting image of the rose gold color on Apple’s iPhones.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Samsung Electronics. The mecca for original thinkers.

SEE ALSO:
Slavish copier Samsung races to knock off Apple’s ‘3D Touch’ in Galaxy S7 – October 13, 2015
Samsung’s Galaxy S6 design looks like another iPhone knockoff – February 4, 2015
Slavish copier Samsung in talks to launch Apple Pay knockoff – December 16, 2014
Samsung to knockoff Apple’s Touch ID fingerprint scanner on Galaxy S5, sources say – February 24, 2014
Shameless Samsung’s knockoff of Apple’s Passbook goes live on some Galaxy devices – August 9, 2013
Now slavish copycat Samsung attempts to knockoff Apple’s retail stores (with video) – August 23, 2012
Samsung: Shameless slavish copiers – August 13, 2012
Apple attorney: Instead of innovating, Samsung chose to copy iPhone and iPad – July 31, 2012
Apple: Google warned Samsung against slavishly copying our products – July 25, 2012
Now Samsung slavishly copies Apple’s Mac mini – June 1, 2012
Samsung Mobile chief ‘designer’ denies that Samsung’s instinct is to slavishly copy Apple – March 23, 2012
Slavish copier Samsung shamelessly steals Apple’s iPhone 3G design – again – January 3, 2012
Slavish copier Samsung uses girl actress from iPhone 4S ad for Galaxy Tab 8.9 spot (with video) – January 2, 2012
Now Samsung’s slavishly copying Apple’s iPad television ads (with videos) – December 30, 2011
Judge: Can you tell me which is iPad and which is yours? Samsung lawyer: ‘Not at this distance your honor’ – October 14, 2011
Why are Apple’s icons on the wall of Samsung’s store? – September 24, 2011
Apple to Samsung: ‘Blatant copying is wrong’ – April 18, 2011
Apple sues Samsung for attempting to copy look and feel of iPhone, iPad – April 18, 2011
Samsung’s ‘Instinct’ is obviously to make Apple iPhone knockoffs – April 1, 2008

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Coule” for the heads up.]

20 Comments

  1. This sort of thing takes me back to the days of the Ford Mustang. After it became an instant hit, every freaking car company in America introduced some facsimile of a “pony” car. When it comes to making money, companies throw all their pride aside and copy to the best of their ability whether it was part of their plans going forward or not. Companies that didn’t even have the concept of what a “pony” car was tried to design them hoping for some piece of the action. It’s kind of pathetic but that’s how things are done when you’re trying to stay in business.

    If only Apple could patent some of the stuff they do so they couldn’t get ripped off so quickly. Samsung has always been the master of copying other companies’ products so I guess it’s to be expected that whatever Apple has, Samsung will soon copy it. Wall Street is counting on it to prove Apple has no moat.

    1. Patents have nothing to with it; Samsung has figured out that it’s more profitable to blatantly copy knowing the courts are sufficiently slow to be of consequence. When they lose, they appeal, and the whole process starts over. By the time it makes it through all of the courts, the case is so watered down that the penalty doesn’t even hurt as much as a slap on the wrist!

    2. What Wall Street and its cadre of analysts don’t comprehend is that Apple needs no moat, because it is not beleaguered. It is not a stand-alone castle under siege by rampaging armies of competitors. Instead, it is an institution that sets standards for others to follow. Without its leadership the others default to the stultifying practices that have produced generations of crap for landfills. It’s been said before by wise business analysts: it is Apple’s business model that should be emulated, not its products.

Add Your Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.