IDC: Apple continues to outgrow the PC market, No. 3 in U.S. market share, No. 5 worldwide

Worldwide PC shipments totaled 80.8 million units in the fourth quarter of 2014 (4Q14), a year-on-year decline of -2.4%, according to the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker. Total shipments were slightly above expectations of -4.8% growth, but the market still contracted both year on year and in comparison to the third quarter. Although the holiday quarter saw shipment volume inch above 80 million for the first time in 2014, the final quarter nonetheless marked the end of yet another difficult year – the third consecutive year with overall volumes declining. On an annual basis, 2014 shipments totaled 308.6 million units, down -2.1% from the prior year.

Although the U.S. and Europe remained stronger than other markets, growth in these mature regions slowed from earlier in the year. Asia/Pacific (excluding Japan)(APeJ) continued to strengthen, seeing only a very slight increase in volume as a number of public projects and improving consumer demand helped stabilize the market. Similarly, commercial demand, which boosted growth earlier in the year, has slowed while consumer demand is gradually coming back. Nevertheless, the market progress has been fueled by low-priced systems, including growth of Chromebooks and promotion of Windows 8 + Bing. Constraints on Bing promotions, such as limits on larger-sized devices, could remove a key market driver while some fourth quarter production was attributed to getting ahead of holiday-related production constraints in Asia in the first quarter, effectively shifting volume from early 2015 into the end of 2014.

“The strength from market leaders, as well as improvement in Asia/Pacific and the consumer market more generally, are positive signs for the PC market,” said Loren Loverde, IDC Vice President, Worldwide PC Tracker, in a statement. “Growth of Chrome, Bing, all-in-ones, ultraslim, convertibles, and touch systems similarly make PCs more compelling and competitive. Nevertheless, some of the gains are relatively small, and weakening drivers like Bing promotions and end of XP support transitions, cast a shadow of doubt on the strength of the market going into 2015.”

“The U.S. PC market continued to grow in the fourth quarter, outperforming the global market for the tenth consecutive quarter. The past year was supported by Windows XP to 7 migrations in the commercial segment while consumer volume continued to decline,” said Rajani Singh, Senior Research Analyst, Personal Computing, in a statement. “Moving forward, the U.S. PC market should see flat to slightly positive growth. The U.S. consumer PC market will finally move to positive growth in 2015, strengthened by the slowdown in the tablet market, vendor and OEM efforts to rejuvenate the PC market, the launch of Window 10, and replacement of older PCs.”

Regional Highlights

United States – Market leader HP had a remarkable quarter with year on year growth jumping to more than 26%. Other key vendors also had strong performances. As a result, the U.S. PC market concentration has increased to 83% of shipments coming from the top 5 vendors. Portable PC growth remains strong with double-digit growth from a year ago, while desktop shipments declined by more than -10%.

Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) – PC shipments in EMEA posted a slight increase in the fourth quarter, fuelled mainly by strong consumer demand during the holiday season. Vendors continued to stock up ahead of Christmas and January promotional sales, and before the February change to Bing promotions, which will exclude 15 inch notebooks. This translated into stronger than expected shipments of portable PCs, while desktop PC sell-in remained softer, particularly in the commercial space. Political and economic factors, especially unfavourable exchange rates, also negatively impacted numerous countries across the region.

Japan – The market continued to slump following a surge of XP replacements a year ago. Vendors took the time to clear excess inventory in the channel, leading to a lean quarter. Volume fell below 3 million units in the quarter, a drop of -35% year on year and its lowest level since the fourth quarter of 2006.

Asia/Pacific (excluding Japan) – APeJ continued to stabilize with growth rising to positive territory following several years of significant declines. HP had a strong recovery from recent quarters, while Dell continued to gain share. Slowing growth in tablets and smartphones as well as promotions of lower-priced Windows 8 + Bing systems helped relieve some pressure on the PC market.

Vendor Highlights

Lenovo continued to push hard in EMEA, expanding channels and capturing consumer holiday demand. The company also outpaced the market in the U.S. – though by a smaller margin – and was closer to market growth in other regions. Shipments reached a record 16 million units in 4Q14 with year-on-year growth of 4.9%, and annual shipments up over 10% from last year.

HP also saw a tremendous quarter with 15.9 million units and year on year growth surpassing 15%. A particularly strong quarter in the U.S. was a key driver, along with some volume for public projects in Asia/Pacific and Africa.

Dell shipped over 10.8 million units growing 8.5% on the year, much of it based on a strong performance in notebooks in the U.S. and APeJ. Rising growth in APeJ also helped offset slowing growth in the U.S. and Europe.

Acer grew over 3%, in part due to low volume a year ago but also from the success of its Chromebooks and entry-level notebooks. Acer’s recovery in the U.S. and Europe slowed, in part due to higher year ago numbers.

Apple kept the number 5 position on a worldwide basis, maintaining its lead over ASUS. The company’s steady growth, along with recent price cuts and improved demand in mature markets, has helped it to consistently outgrow the market.

Top 5 Vendors, Worldwide PC Shipments, Fourth Quarter 2014 (Preliminary) (Shipments are in thousands of units)
IDC: Top 5 Vendors, Worldwide PC Shipments, Fourth Quarter 2014 (Preliminary) (Shipments are in thousands of units)

[protected-iframe id=”dee9d560ca29000241b2d4f4aea1443a-17146794-18685410″ info=”” ]

Top 5 Vendors, United States PC Shipments, Fourth Quarter 2014 (Preliminary) (Shipments are in thousands of units)
IDC: Top 5 Vendors, United States PC Shipments, Fourth Quarter 2014 (Preliminary) (Shipments are in thousands of units)

Top 5 Vendors, Worldwide PC Shipments, 2014 (Preliminary) (Units Shipments are in thousands)
IDC: Top 5 Vendors, Worldwide PC Shipments, 2014 (Preliminary) (Units Shipments are in thousands)

Top 5 Vendors, United States PC Shipments, 2014 (Preliminary) (Units Shipments are in thousands)
IDC: Top 5 Vendors, United States PC Shipments, 2014 (Preliminary) (Units Shipments are in thousands)
Source: IDC Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker, January 12, 2015

Table Notes:
• Some IDC estimates prior to financial earnings reports.
• Shipments include shipments to distribution channels or end users. OEM sales are counted under the vendor/brand under which they are sold.
• PCs include Desktops, Portables, Ultraslim Notebooks, Chromebooks, and Workstations and do not include handhelds, x86 Servers and Tablets (i.e. iPad, or Tablets with detachable keyboards running either Windows or Android). Data for all vendors are reported for calendar periods.

Source: International Data Corporation

MacDailyNews Take: We’ll wait for Apple’s official results on the 27th, thanks.

Why doesn’t IDC wait for Apple’s real Mac unit sales numbers? Most likely because they’d have to use Apple’s real Mac unit sales numbers.

As we wrote back in July:

The bottom line goal of unit share manipulators: Make the average Joe think he’s buying a “winning” product by making Apple products look like they’re “losing.” If the unit share numbers don’t look good for their clients and/or bad for Apple, they’ll concoct other ways to count them until they do.

One thing these shady data massagers can’t hide under tons of questionable data: Apple’s immense profits. That’s why they don’t release monthly press releases on profit share. If they did, they’d be out of business. Profit share, the actual measure of success in a market, is to be ignored at all costs by those in the business of “influencing consumer behavior and buying preferences.”

Related articles:
Why did IDC lowball Apple’s Mac sales by 9.7% last quarter? – October 23, 2014
IDC again undercounts Mac unit sales – October 9, 2014
IDC and Gartner numbers do not jibe with Apple’s double digit U.S. Mac growth – July 27, 2014
Exposing IDC’s, Gartner’s, and Strategy Analytics’ PC, phone and tablet data on Apple – November 16, 2013\
Smashing Apple: Is Strategy Analytics in Samsung’s pocket? – August 3, 2013
Strategy Analytics claims Android now dominates tablet market – July 31, 2013
Gartner and IDC trumpet wildly incongruous Mac unit sales estimates – April 11, 2013
Canalys unafraid to count iPad, puts Apple third in worldwide PC market share – January 26, 2011


  1. Even the Microsoft retail store cannot sell any PCs. The entire market evaporated not long after the introduction of Windows 8 but IDC again somehow didn’t get that memo.

  2. The difference is that Apple makes around $200 per PC, while the market leader Lenovo makes less than $10 a PC, so when you figure out who made what, Apple’s 20M computers is about $4B in profit, while Lenovo’s 60M computers might have been less than $600M in profit. It’s quite possible that Apple’s profit in PCs is greater than the profit of the other top 4 PC makers, combined.

    So, who won the PC wars?

  3. Completely invalid numbers. Apple reported selling 5.52 million Macs in the previous quarter yet IDC are sticking to their original “estimates”.

    If everything else stayed the same then Apple actually had 6.6% share last quarter (adding the extra Mac sales to both Apple and the total) and if they really did grow by 18.9% they would now be at 8.04% share and be in 4th place.

    Lastly, IDC obviously know nothing about maths or at least how to describe it. If the market declined by “-2.4%” that means it increased by 2.4%.

    1. Ok here’s why we need to be able to delete comments. Just realized the other column was last year not last quarter. Move along folks nothing to see here…. Except the bit about the minus 2.4%…

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.