“Samsung Tomorrow is Samsung’s version of Nokia Conversations: it serves as the official blog for the company and is managed by its Corporate Communications team,” Vlad Savov reports for The Verge. “It is also, apparently, a technology review site.”
“Posted today, this Gear S analysis is the latest in a running series of Samsung Tomorrow ‘unofficial reviews’ of the company’s latest hardware,” Savov reports. “It tells the reader that ‘the UI of the Gear S is as intuitive as it gets’ and ‘as much as this may sound biased, Gear S is awesome.'”
“What it doesn’t disclose anywhere is whether the self-identified ‘most average editor’ authoring the piece is employed by Samsung, or that he’s writing for a website owned by Samsung,” Savov reports. “This leaves ample room for misinterpretation…”
Read more in the full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: Fatuous, deceitful, crooked Samsung deserves every kick in the teeth that’s coming their way and then some.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Dan K.” for the heads up.]
Related articles:
Woz on Samsung Galaxy Gear stupidwatch: I threw out the worthless thing after half a day – July 2, 2014
Clueless companies race to debut stupidwatches before Apple defines the smartwatch – January 3, 2014
Jim Cramer: ‘The curtain has closed’ on Samsung’s stupidwatch – October 3, 2013
The Verge reviews Samsung’s Galaxy Gear stupidwatch: Orwellian, unintuitive, oversized, and overpriced – October 2, 2013
Jean-Louis Gassée: I hope Tim Cook had fun goading Samsung to make their Galaxy stupidwatch – September 9, 2013
Stupidwatch: Why Samsung’s Galaxy Gear is a flop – September 5, 2013
Samsung Galaxy Gear watch looks rushed, misses the mark – September 4, 2013
The Galaxy Gear stupidwatch: Without Apple to copy, Samsung is clueless – September 4, 2013
Samsung announces ‘Galaxy Gear’ watch accessory for Galaxy Android devices – September 4, 2013