Apple-Samsung ruling suggests South Korea is a FRAND rogue state; expect diplomatic repercussions

“A couple of court decisions announced in Seoul, South Korea, this morning indicate that South Korea has decided to become a rogue state in connection with standard-essential patents, essentially telling foreign companies that in order to sell their technology products to the country’s 50-million population, they must bow to extortion by Samsung and LG,” Florian Mueller writes for FOSS Patents.

“This is highly problematic and will have diplomatic repercussions,” Mueller writes. “The victims of such abuse will be companies from the United States, Europe and Japan, and increasingly also Chinese companies. I don’t know what Apple is going to do, but it would make sense to talk to both U.S. presidential candidates at the earliest opportunity.”

Mueller writes, “What appears at first sight to be a mixed ruling and will be subject to a de novo (from scratch) review by an appeals court is actually a declaration of a trade war. It would mean that foreign companies would either have to bow to Samsung’s and LG’s demands and, among other things, give up their own non-standard-essential intellectual property or stop selling in Korea. If I were Apple, I would defend myself vigorously and, if necessary, write off the Korean market until this issue is resolved through bilateral U.S.-Korea talks or at the level of the World Trade Organization.”

Much more in the full article – recommended – here.

MacDailyNews Take: As expected: Samsung’s criminal leadership pretty much owns South Korea.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Jax44” for the heads up.]

Related article:
South Korean court delivers split decision in Apple v. Samsung patent battle – August 24, 2012

55 Comments

  1. Apple, you might want to spend the bulk of your time with Mr. Romney.

    If Sam Korea doesn’t want to play fair, the U.S. should pull its troops out as an experiment to see how many minutes they last.

    1. You did not just say this? Come on man there is a lot more to US bases in SK than you let on.

      The US needs those bases there just as much as they do.

      The issue is the strength of South Korea as a whole and the huge amount of work South Korean companies provide for Americans. Hyundai, Kia, Samsung just to name 3 have huge footprints in the US economy.

      There are far more important things than Apple vs Samsung.

      1. But this isn’t (just) about Samesung VS Apple (although that court case brought it to the surface)
        It is about leveraging standards essential patents. You simply can’t allow companies to leverage (after the fact) patents they agreed to reasonably license (FOSS) in order to be a part of a “standard” required to operate.

      2. Who pays to defend these foreign companies? the American middle class! Romney will keep passing that on to the working people of this country while his kind make jobs overseas, and pay pennies on the dollar in taxes!
        If Romney and his fiscal aristocratic class want to protect those (their?) foreign interests maybe they should at least pay enough to cover the cost of that protection!

        1. @greg,
          Where did you get your higher education? Based on your ideas, you have a pretty good case for getting your money back! Not one single thing you wrote makes any sense. Try again.

        2. Greg : please don’t try to confuse an iPad with fighting communism. Consumer products is one thing. Fighting the bad guys is another thing. As much as we all enjoy our Apple stuff it pales in comparison when speaking about national defense of a country. Please keep things in perspective. And move to North Korea you dumb ass!

    2. Let’s be blatant here. The Neo-Conservative corrupted Republican Party consistently has this strategy in mind:

      Neo-Feudalism. I call it ‘Kill the poor. Feed the rich’. And if you’re the middle class, you’re the worker peasants. Have fun with that.

      And no, the loony left is just as nuts with their own ‘Kill the rich. Feed the poor.’

      Sane moderation cures all political ills. Sadly, the USA has run out of that medication. 😛

  2. Crying over spilled milk as Samsung can easily claim the same whenever they lose a case in other jurisdictions around the world.

    Apple can look after itself without Government intervention as the US Government is not known to be righteous either. Heck if government had an honest bow in it’s body, Casino’s would not exist. Money follows no rules and more of it is made by breaking the rules.

  3. South Korea’s desire for economic extortion will lead to economic isolation and economic implosion. I suspect that South Korean government officials have been eating too much Kim Jong-il branded kimchi.

  4. Not a problem. This is an easy fix with about $120 billion of cash. Look at their key source products and materials. Then buy the source, the inventory, control the source of the manufacturing of the device you want to shut down.

    That will end this crap. Crush their life lines until they stop! Man up Tim Cook! Think, “What would Steve Jobs do?” Then execute it!!!

    1. OK for the last time! Apple is a PUBLIC company hence the cash you speak of cannot be spent like a drunken sailor by Cook. The Board of Directors needs to always look at any expenditure as one that provides a real and measurable ROI for the shareholders and what you propose is hog wash!

      As well, there are a lot of private companies that are worth trillions of dollars that no one knows about but who play ball with Samsung via Samsung Group and ball they will play if Apple even tried to impose carnage in the manufacturing or supply chain sector.

      1. ROI. What do you think the ROI would be to cut off or even slow down the only real rip off device cutting into the sale of 50% of your existing sales? These sub assemblies are clearly stamped on almost every soldered in part on the board. Several of these sub assembled items maybe common to what Apple already uses. Control the flow of the key chemical, chip, power control device, etc. … Buy the next 3 years of their production and cut them off.

        You don’t need to payoff anyone of or beg a judge to be allowed to sell something you have full rights too. Over there and in China, power is strength and you don’t gain respect begging for what is already yours.

        1. Silliness. Apple cannot cut off Samsung at the knees as Samsung will fight back with all of it’s might and that is not a fight Apple can win. Samsung Group is too big to try and strong arm them.

          As well, Apple needs to firm up agreements with other supliers before they can devest themselves from using quality Samsung parts.

          Let’s see how well things go with the new iPhone displays that will be made by Sharp and LG. Apple cannot afford a Faux Pas as Android will pounce like never before.

    2. What would Steve Jobs do? I think he would stop selling anything Apple in Korea AFTER he consults with Obama and gets the promise that all Samsung stuff is banned in the US.

      In addition, Obama can then start offering gifts to N. Korea like nuclear power technology and long range cruise missiles.

      heheheheheheheheheh. Remember, never piss off somebody a whole lot bigger than you.

  5. Financing multiple competitive component factories outside Korea would work a lot faster than any diplomacy. Tim Cook is the master of the supply chain, this should play to his strengths.

    C’mon, what else is Apple going to do with $100 Billion in the bank?

  6. Family is everything in Korea, so as long as the people in power at Samsung have the family names, Kim, Sung and Park, they can break any law they want, since 90% of the population is named Kim, Sung or Park, including the judges and the politicians.

      1. call me old fashioned but I just don’t appreciate any culture that commonly eats dogs. I like dogs- some dogs I like more than some people. They’re mans best friend. I don’t think they should be eaten. That’s just my opinion tho…

        1. When you’re really hungry you will be amazed what you will eat. The only food I found wholly disgusting was seal. Monkey meat was excellent. I never knowing had dog although I visited several Korean villages. Some colleagues praised cat meat but I doubt that they were describing eating pussy.

    1. That’s pretty close, the family name and blood line are one of the most important things in Korea. The 5 most common names in Korea are Kim(김) Lee(이) Park (박) Choi (최)’and Jeong (정) in that order. Totally about 64% of the population Sung (성) is not a common name in fact it actually means family name. These names are so common because these were some of largest clans from Korean history so it’s not inbreeding even though it looks liked it. Many people share these family names but have no close family relationship
      @lordthree what culture are you from? What meats do you eat?

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.