Report: Samsung Galaxy S III phone explodes in user’s car in Ireland

“Samsung Electronics Co said it was investigating reports that one of its flagship Galaxy S III smartphones exploded in a user’s car in Ireland,” Reuters reports.

“A Dublin-based consumer posted comments and photos on a web site on Wednesday, saying his Galaxy phone ‘exploded’ while mounted on his car dashboard,” Reuters reports. “He wrote that while he was driving, ‘suddenly a white flame, sparks and a bang came out of the phone.'”

Reuters reports, “There have been other reports of Samsung smartphones overheating. In March, a Korean schoolboy reported that a spare battery for his Galaxy S II exploded in his back pocket. Samsung said then that the cause was massive external pressure or force… On Friday, the company said it was still looking into the reported Irish incident.”

Samsung Galaxy III explodes, burns, flame, sparks

Samsung Galaxy III explodes, burns, flame, sparks

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: This is a very dangerous situation. Good luck with that, slavish copier. Maybe Apple could get the U.S. Fire Administration to act faster than the U.S. courts on the issue of Galaxy III importation?

Now, this Reuters piece does not carry a reporter’s name, but it is tagged “SEOUL,” a very redundant move considering how the piece wraps:

“Heat issues have been reported with other devices. In March, influential consumer watchdog Consumer Reports said Apple’s latest iPad tablet threw off a lot more heat than the previous version, lending weight to complaints on Internet forums that the device could get uncomfortably warm after heavy use.”

Reuters is a transparent joke and the credibility of their Seoul-based “reporter” is worse off than that Irish guy’s Samsung lighter. No wonder there’s no byline.

Speaking of jokes, we’re sure Consumer Reports will be all over this issue with multiple press releases, media interviews, self-described “testing,” and more. Right, CR?

Please see related articles below.

Related articles:
Apple’s iPad tops Consumer Reports’ list of tablets – April 2, 2012
Tests prove Apple’s new iPad heat levels comparable to Android tablets – March 26, 2012
Expert: iPad heat claims overblown, not a real issue – March 22, 2012
Consumer Reports’ bombshell: New iPad runs hotter than predecessor but ‘not especially uncomfortable’ – March 20, 2012

Rush Limbaugh reviews new Apple iPad: ‘It is amazing, it really is; and we’re giving one away each day’ – March 20, 2012
DisplayMate: New Apple iPad Retina display decisively blows away all other tablets – March 20, 2012
Computerworld reviews new Apple iPad: ‘Gorgeous; the new king of the tablet hill’ – March 19, 2012
Paul Thurrot reviews new Apple iPad: ‘The best tablet on the market by far; the only tablet currently worth considering’ – March 18, 2012
PC Magazine reviews new Apple iPad: ‘The finest large-screen tablet; a truly gorgeous screen; Editor’s Choice’ – March 17, 2012
Daring Fireball’s Gruber reviews new Apple iPad: ‘Pixels pixels pixels. Battery battery battery. Speed speed speed.’ – March 15, 2012
Fox News’ Morris reviews new Apple iPad: ‘Easily the best tablet I’ve ever seen; a giant leap for connected mankind’ (with video) – March 15, 2012
The Verge’s Topolsky reviews new Apple iPad: ‘Otherworldly; easily the most beautiful computer display I have ever looked at’ – March 15, 2012
NYT’s Pogue reviews new Apple iPad: ‘Incredibly sharp and clear; dazzling’ – March 15, 2012
WSJ’s Mossberg reviews new Apple iPad: ‘The best tablet on the planet’ – March 15, 2012
USA Today’s Baig reviews new Apple iPad: ‘The finest tablet you can buy – period’ – March 15, 2012


  1. What the F**** is Consumer Report doing about this. Are they even taking the SS-III through the same testes like they do with Apple products yet, or are they being paid to review only Apple products?
    If they don’t do anything about this issue, we all know how biased they really are.

  2. To be fair, it seems to be at the point of connection, not the actual battery. Without seeing the cable – and knowing if it’s a proper charger or adaptor it’s easy to jump to unfair conclusions.

    1. Yes, so we should be expecting the press to jump to unfair conclusions about this, right away.

      Especially after the whole “iPhone catches fire on plane” that was later determined to be caused by a) 3rd party battery that was b) so poorly installed by a non-authorized tech that they punctured it when putting the phone back together.

  3. Just how hot does an shorted battery get? At the short itself where it is arcing? Is it hot enough to ignite magnesium? What about VaporMg?
    I remember burning magnesium ribbons in high school. Really bright light and rather intense heat.
    How long would a VaporMg case burn if the overall weight of the device was, for argument’s sake, the same as a Microsoft Surface™ RT device?

  4. Exploded? Don’t they mean it caught fire instead ?

    When I read something exploded I expect to see a pile of small pieces they had to sweep up, not a largely intact phone with an untouched LI-on battery in the device.

  5. Well I am no fan of SamDung but I get suspicious about exploding iPhones. Was it not some years back that in France some reports were coming out about the iPhone exploding? Until there is a consistent reports will I crap on Sampung.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.