Apple regains momentum as techs cut losses following decline in U.S. new home construction

“Technology stocks tried to cut their losses in late trading Tuesday, with Apple Inc. getting back into positive territory, while Adobe Systems Inc. remained in the red,” Rex Crum reports for MarketWatch. “The Nasdaq Composite Index came back from its session low point, yet was still down by 7 points at 3,071, while the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index and the Morgan Stanley High Tech 35 Index were each off by about 0.5%.”

“The broader stock market declined following mixed housing data. The Commerce Department said new home construction fell by 1.1% in February, but that permits for future work rose,” Crum reports. “In the technology sector, Apple shares got back into positive territory, and were up 0.71% one day after the company announced a $10 billion stock buyback plan and its first dividend payments since 1995.”

Crum reports, “On the downside, shares of Adobe gave up 4% to trade at $33.11 following the software company’s quarterly results, which came out late Monday. The maker of Photoshop software reported a rise in its fiscal first-quarter sales, but writedowns and other matters caused Adobe’s earnings to drop by 21% from a year ago. Pacific Crest analyst Brendan Barnicle cut his rating on Adobe to sector perform, or neutral, from outperform calling the company’s earnings results ‘underwhelming.'”

Read more in the full article here.


  1. Adobe is getting hammered because there new way of renting software will not work. Users need to have the flexibility to skip a version and not be penalized. There exorbitant upgrade pricing and there expectation of having every user upgrade is what has them in the toilet. Adobe is not only lazy, they are greedy too.

  2. Adobe signed its death warrant with its rental scheme. Sure, companies will pay, but today there are more freelancers than companies in the design business. They won’t upgrade, ever.

  3. @Romney-Rubio 2012
    What difference does that make? Apple increased more under in 3.5 years than under 8 years under either George Bush. What about the Dow? Which statistics do you pick and choose to make your point(s)?
    When you’re dealing with large numbers, one percent of a million is more than 10 percent of a thousand.
    Let’s ask the question of percentage of increase under Obama vs. Bush. Then you’ll have my ear.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.