U.S. gov’t mandates special chip in all cellphones; users can’t opt out of presidential messages

According to The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Personal Localized Alerting Network (PLAN) is a new system that allows users who own an enabled mobile device to receive geographically-targeted, text-like messages alerting them of imminent threats to safety in their area. The alerts, currently being rolled out in New York City and Washington D.C. and expected to be in place in those cities by the end of 2011, would be done through a special chip to be installed on new handheld devices. It will use GPS technology and will send some of the alerts based on the location of the phone user. The alert system is expected to be instituted in rest of the U.S. by April 2012. Certain high-end cell phones are PLAN-enabled, but starting next year, all cellphones will be required to have the chip that receives alerts.

The Warning, Alert and Response Network (WARN) Act requires participating wireless carriers to activate PLAN technology by a deadline determined by the FCC, which is April 2012. Participants that will offer PLAN ahead of schedule include AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon.

How Does PLAN Work?
• Authorized national, state or local government officials send alerts to PLAN.
• PLAN authenticates the alert, verifies that the sender is authorized, and sends it to participating wireless carriers.
• Participating wireless carriers push the alerts from cell towers to mobile phones in the affected area. The alerts appear like text messages on mobile devices.

These “text-like messages” are geographically targeted. For example, a customer living in downtown New York would not receive a threat alert if they happen to be in Chicago when the alert is sent. Similarly, someone visiting downtown New York from Chicago on that same day would receive the alert. This requires a PLAN enabled mobile device and participation by the wireless provider in PLAN.

Users are automatically enrolled, as PLAN allows government officials to send “text-like messages” to all subscribers with PLAN-enabled devices if their wireless carrier participates in the program. Users do not sign up for this service. Users do not pay to receive “text-like messages” from PLAN which will be accompanied by a unique attention signal and vibration, which is particularly helpful to people with hearing or vision-related disabilities.

According to FEMA, users will receive three types of alerts from PLAN: (1) alerts issued by the president; (2) alerts involving imminent threats to safety of life; and (3) Amber Alerts. Participating carriers may allow subscribers to block alerts involving imminent threats to safety of life and/or Amber Alerts, but not presidential alerts. Presidential alerts are required of cellphone users and cannot be turned off.

MacDailyNews Take: We get “text-like messages” all day long; no “special chip” required. What else, if anything, does this “special chip” do? Is it just us or did the slope just get slipperier?

Yeah, yeah, we know: This is for our protection. It’s only for public safety. The government chip is “special.” Take off the tinfoil hats. This is a “Good Thing™. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

We have to wonder, though. What’s next? Maybe we’d all be “safer” if the government could use their federally-mandated “special chip” to turn on your cellphone cameras in “an emergency” in order to get a look at what’s going on around you? And your phones’ microphones, so the government can hear, too? How else could government-mandated special chips be used to make us “safer?”

Has anyone read Nineteen Eighty-Four recently?

You know what? The world is a dangerous place and you can’t protect everyone from everything. We’d rather retain what freedoms we have left and take our chances than to be forced to carry special government-mandated chips and receive presidential “text-like messages” that we can’t turn off, if we simply want to carry our cellphones.

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. – Benjamin Franklin

Related articles:
Apple open to lawsuit over location data collection – May 11, 2011
Apple, Google detail mobile privacy policies before US Senate subcommittee – May 10, 2011
Recap of Apple and Google’s testimony before Senator Al Franken’s mobile privacy hearing – May 10, 2011
Apple, Google to face U.S. Senator Al Franken’s subcommittee in mobile privacy hearing – May 9, 2011
Apple’s Bud Tribble to testify in U.S. Senator Al Franken’s Judiciary Subcommittee hearings on mobile privacy – May 6, 2011
Apple and Google head to Washington D.C. for hearing – May 6, 2011
Apple releases iOS 4.3.3 – May 4, 2011
Apple, Google set to testify at U.S. Congressional hearing on location data to begin May 10th – May 2, 2011
Steve Jobs: Apple isn’t tracking anyone; looks forward to testifying before Congress – April 27, 2011
Apple releases Q&A on Location Data: ‘Apple is not tracking the location of your iPhone’ – April 27, 2011
U.S. Senate Democrat Franken to hold mobile privacy hearing; Apple, Google summoned – April 26, 2011
Illinois Attorney General Madigan requests meeting with Apple, Google – April 25, 2011
Apple sued for privacy invasion, computer fraud over iOS location data collection, storage – April 25, 2011
Steve Jobs on iOS location tracking: We don’t track anyone, but Droid does – April 25, 2011
Apple iPhone collects location info even when location services are turned off by user – April 25, 2011
Android phones regularly transmit location data to Google ‘at least several times an hour’ – April 22, 2011
House Democrat questions legality of Apple’s iPhone, iPad location tracking – April 21, 2011
Apple’s iOS location tracking file caused by a bit of unfinished code? – April 21, 2011
U.S. Senator Al Franken demands answers from Apple’s Steve Jobs over iPhone tracking – April 21, 2011
Expert: iPhone tracking story is nothing new and Apple is not collecting the data – April 21, 2011
‘untrackerd’ jailbreak utility blocks iOS from storing recorded iPhone location data – April 21, 2011
Apple’s iPhone tracks everywhere you go; stores the info in secret file on the device – April 20, 2011

117 Comments

    1. Some of their comments indicated that they are all for it, as long as it’s the government tracking people. They don’t need a GPS chip in every phone just to notify people of a disaster in a particular area. They can just broadcast from all towers in that area. The real aim here is to be able to track everybody all the time. Schumer and Leahy are all over this.

      And a note to Mr. Schumer: No, it is not against the law to attempt to avoid DUI checkpoints, even if you’re driving drunk, but most especially if you’re not. I have a right to choose not lose minutes or hours of my life being questioned by the police without probable cause by avoiding those checkpoints, which are illegal under the 4th Amendment.

    2. “All Citizens are to go to and remain in their homes until further notice. There is nothing for you to worry about.”

      “We control the vertical. We control the horizontal.”

    1. From the FCC website:

      “In 2006, Congress passed the Warning, Alert and Response Network (WARN) Act, requiring carriers that choose to participate to activate PLAN technology by a deadline determined by the FCC, which is April 2012. Participants that will offer PLAN at least two calendar quarters ahead of schedule in New York City are AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon. Ninety percent of New York subscribers who have a PLAN-capable mobile device in these cities will be able to receive PLAN alerts by the end of 2011.
      For more information on PLAN (Personal Localized Alerting Network), visit the Federal Communications Commission website at http://www.fcc.gov or follow @FCC on Twitter.”

      2006? But that occurred during the Bush administration! Two years before Bush finally had to leave office thanks to the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution.

      Nice knee jerk reaction, a-holes!

      1. Not so. It is one thing to receive alerts based on the tower locations you are near. It is another thing to have the government tracking our devices! Don’t be blind to what this group is trying to do “a-hole”. Did you not see what just happened with the people revolting over seas? Wouldn’t the government like to know where all the people are all the time?

        ALERT AND TRACK ARE NOT THE SAME THING!

        1. To Jersey Trader

          It bears repeating

          The Commercial Alert System was introduced by republican Jim Demint during the Bush administration. Furthermore, the plan was passed with high support by the republican controlled congress in 2006 and signed by President Bush.

          “Legislation was passed at the end of the 109th Congress (Warning, Alert, and Response Network
          Act, or WARN Act, as signed into law as Title VI of P.L. 109-347) to assure funding to public television stations to install digital equipment to handle alerts. The law also required the
          establishment of a committee to provide the FCC with recommendations regarding the transmittal of emergency alerts by commercial mobile service providers to their subscribers. Committee recommendations provided the structure for a Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS), regulated by the FCC. Under the timetable agreed to by the FCC and FEMA, CMAS is scheduled to become operational by April 7, 2012.”

          “In response to a requirement in the Warning, Alert, and Response Network Act, or WARN Act, as
          signed into law (Title VI of P.L. 109-347), the FCC worked with commercial mobile service providers to create a Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS) that would be able to relay alerts
          through cell phones. In addition to presidential alerts, which clearly are a federal responsibility, the service would transmit emergency alerts generated by state, local, and other non-federal authorities. The gateway for CMAS is being developed as part of IPAWS. FEMA and the FCC have committed to a timetable for development of IPAWS and CMAS that is intended to deliver mobile alert messages to consumers by April 7, 2012.10”

          Click to access RL32527.pdf

      1. 2006? Congress passed…

        First, Bush was in the Executive branch. He could only sign into law, legislation passed by Congress. The House in 2006, after the fall election was controlled by Democrats and it gave us that ditzy, free fall spending, bitch Nancy Pelosi and her banana republic style of governing.

        Dumbass!

        1. You mean it is a big government doing.

          Wish we would all come together and realize who the enemy is. Dems and Pubs are the same animal with different stripes. Read 1984.

        2. Word, indeed.
          For all the posturing, the Rethugnicans are the party of intrusive government. They want to script a bunch of non-medical BS into what a Doctor has to say to a patient seeking an abortion. Yes, read a script of non medical and unsubstantiated ( by scientific evidence ) nonsense.
          Nothing like big government telling a doctor what he/she can tell the patient- word for word.

        3. Oh please. Bush’s ridiculous tax cuts for the wealthy, that never made any jobs, did more to increase the deficit (and continue to do so) than almost anything else.

    2. This has absolutely nothing to do with Obama, About 15 seconds of research will tell you this was sponsored by Jim DeMint and passed virtually unanimously in Congress in 1996, and accompanied by an executive order by then President Bush.

      This is basically the Emergency Broadcast System (that’s been on television and radio for half a century) updated for new devices. There will be no political messages. Only emergency bulletins, severe weather advisories and Amber Alerts (and you can opt out of the second two).

      If you want to blame someone, blame DeMint.
      Click this link for actual, you know, facts.

      1. Clinton was president in 1996. Media matters is nothing more than a ext. of the far left Soro’s, not exactly factual or unbiased. And I don’t care which party tries to implement something like this, this is big brother ruling over you. Saying you can’t opt out is a totalitarian government ruling over you, I don’t live in Cuba, this is suppose to be a open and free country. And if it’s not ok for companies to track you then it’s not ok for the government, no matter who is running it.

        1. “Media matters is nothing more than a ext. of the far left Soro’s”

          That comment is typical of someone who subscribes to far right propaganda. Research Media Matters and George Soros via a few non-partisan fact check sites and get back to us.

        2. Oh yes media matters is completely non-partisan and doesn’t promote any type of far left propaganda. It’s the same tired story if someone questions the far left, your your now subscribing to far right propaganda.

          So the far left never promotes propaganda, distortions, hypocrisy, misquotes & out right lies about the facts or plays a consistent double standard? Sure.

    3. And the Patriot Act was free kittens and lollipops for Americans? How is this anything but an extension of said act? Gotta love the zealots. (I was going to say “unthinking zealots”, but that’s redundant.

      1. “One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.”
        There are inferiors on every side, don’t kid yourselves…

  1. MacDailyNews, go Tea Party! Yea! I got to go and put my tinfoil hat on to protect me from the aliens…they are watching us you know. Have you read “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” lately? That’s the book you should have referenced.

    1. MDN is a funny read, usually..but once in a while the entire/selected staff show their REAL TEA PARTY leaning in, often uninformed, rants about politics, liberty and anything hinting of progressive mentality.
      would be so nice if MDR could simply do what it does well. report on apple/tech matters in a silly, funny way and leave more weighty discussions about values to people less biased who attempt, at least, to look with perspective on what they write about.

  2. Okay so if Apple, AT&T, and Google are tracking my current location that is bad…but if Uncle Sam wants to track my location so it can send me mandatory messages that is good.
    Are presidential campaign messages mandatory too?

    just my $0.02

    1. Now this “inquiry” on Google and Apple’s cell phone tracking makes more sense: “How are you tracking your customers? What is the best … er … most invasive … er … advanced … er … UM, How does it work? (Speak slowly, we’re taking notes. And try to use words that even Stewart Smalley could understand.)”

      I can’t wait until my first government issued “text-like” message. Let me guess: “ARBEIT MACHT FREI”

    2. Yes, you will be getting campaign messages, some subtle and others blatant. And no doubt you will be required to acknowledge receipt. And pay for all this self-serving BS.

    1. Wake the fuck up! Gov doesn’t give a rats ass about your life and of those you love! They just want MORE control over you more of your freedom and want to take over everything you think, buy, go or do and that is getting more obvious every day! If you can’t see that, you need to get out of that closet you’ve been living in…

  3. Wow. Anyone else see any problems with this. Didn’t the government just drag in Apple and Google over their possible tracking of users. Apple just gave us the ability to turn it off and opt out. Maybe they would like to just put a chip in our head and get if over with. Maybe jump straight to the Biblical “Mark of the Beast” that we were warned about.

    1. Actually, ‘1984’ was Orwell’s take on the world when he wrote the book in 1948.. He simply transposed the 4 and 8..

      So, instead of “off by 27 years”, he’s been “on” for 63!

      Oh, the humanity.. Like lemmings to the shore?

  4. Great! More mandates from the ‘Sh@t for Brains’ we elect to “Govern” us!

    9/11 was a National tragedy of epic emergency! Not once was a statement of what to do, where to go, how air travel was shut down, passengers stranded, how getting in or out of the country was effected came from the EBS – Emergency Broadcast System.

    As many prior “tests” that had been performed, interrupting my tv program, saying ‘This is a test. Had this been an actual emergency…’, you’d might think if there was ever a time to put that puppy to use… Would have been then!

    1. Congress switched to Democratic control in JANUARY 2007 following the 2006 (November) elections- much like the 2012 elections will be due to Teabagger overreach.
      Passed by a Republican House, Senate & signed by a Republican appointed ( by the 5 Republican ‘Justices’ of the SCOTUS ) President.
      Don’t lay this steaming pile of excrement at Pelosi’s or President Obama’s feet.

      1. Not sure how this posted as a reply to this post.

        As to 9/11- it was a eff up of the highest level by the Bushies. Outgoing Presidents meet with incoming as do staffs. Clinton, Gore, etc all told the incoming admin that the biggest security threat was from a certain recently dead man and his organization and to meet with Richard Clarke- counterterrorism head- ASAP. Clarke had served through the Reagan, Bush I, & Clinton admins- so he as no political hack.
        Bush had his first meeting with Clarke on 12 September, 2001. Well documented and undisputed fact. So much for the Repubs being great on foreign policy and national security.

        1. “No it was Bush.”
          “No it was Obama.”
          “No it was Bush.”

          Well jack monkeys, it’s clear that whoever is to blame there are two more relevant facts:

          1. Bush is on paid retirement, can’t help you.

          2. Obama is unwilling to do jack to help you, and will soon be on paid-retirement.

          So if you’re a D or R, you’re still getting screwed by both D & R’s simultaneously, while you argue about which rapist had better breath. I’m guessing when your both poorer and worse for it, that this silly pissing match is supposed to sooth you at night? Sorry but the minute you pick a side in this retarded D vs. R debate, you instantly become a retard – there are no exceptions.

          Remember infants, how do you tell when a politician is lying? When his lips are moving. Keep this in mind when watching your favorite politicians, and especially when they have D & R sponsorship.

  5. Why are we concerned about this now when the Patriot Act essentially stripped our liberties years ago. You do know that Bush started and Obama continued the idea of holding US citizens indefinitely without charging them if they were suspected of something bad (the crime does not matter). We regularly torture. Posse Comitatus had been dead since Bush. It is long past time to wake up.

    If I murder somebody (or lots of somebodies), the police only have a certain amount of time to charge me one they pick me up. Otherwise they need to let me go. Free. If they charge me with a crime, then they can lock me up. But at least it’s a legal process and I have rights as a US citizen…maybe

    1. If we had a real Supreme Court it would have been struck down. The right wing likes to wrap itself in the Constitution around election time, but doesn’t apparently give a damn about what it says.

  6. they eventually want to chip every person by installing one chip in their skull. This goes a long way towards it. Why? You might ask. All I can think of is they want to control every one somehow. Type in “Aaron Russo Rockefeller” into YouTube and watch the video.

  7. The following is an urgent PLAN Alert targeted to swing state citizens, as authorized and mandated by The WARN Act:

    “Vote Obama in 2012 or the U.S. is doomed. Thank you for your support.”

  8. Note how they roll it out in NYC and Washington D.C. first – the two place hit hardest by 9/11.

    For the record: I opposed The Patriot Act, too.

    Liberty is all we have people. Lose that and it’s all over.

    1. Nope we don’t anymore! Have you seen the Google-NSA cooperation lately to spy on everybody on the net with the excuse of “preventing cyberwars from Chinese hackers”? NSA helped of course, with the orchestration of false flag attacks and media manipulation, so the stupid media hypnotized zombie population buy this shit and give up MORE of their rights. iCal me on this: if we don’t stand up right now they WILL ban all kinds of free speech on the net!

  9. How long before Uncle Sam is selling the right to use those signals so a 4th kind of “text-like message” can be sent to us from Tide, McDonald’s, Ford Motor Company, Microsoft, etc. I can hear the excuse already – “the system has to be paid for some how”.

  10. Talking about digital tyranny! Geez! This must not get through IMO people should stand up to it. The more rights and privacy we give them, the more they’ll take from us and that’s a proven undeniable fact…

  11. Why can’t the carriers just filter the alerts by cell tower?–ie, only cell towers in the relevant geographical area will allow the alert to be transmitted. Why do we need the extra expense of a physical chip in millions of phones to accomplish this ostensible objective?

    1. Carriers CAN just filter alerts by cell tower. We DON’T need these PLAN chips in millions of phones to accomplish this ostensible objective.

      But then the government wouldn’t get to track everybody, and we can’t have that. So PLAN chips are the only solution.

  12. Will be a big bost to pre-chip phone sales. I hope iPhone 5 doesn’t have it initially. I will upgrade all my phones pre chip save one that remains in my home as my “land line” replacement/back up.

  13. Freedom isn’t free. Applies to everyday citizens, not just military. People can choose between an open society where there may still be risks and dangers, or a police state, where you have no freedoms, and there will probably still be dangers.

      1. That’s precisely why the U.S. could be #1 for so long: because the rest of the world fails to understand why we put so much emphasis on personal freedoms. America is rapidly joining the rest of the world in mediocrity and tyranny because her citizens have been conditioned in government schools to rely more and more on government for everything: safety, food, jobs. When Americans valued freedom — both its risks and its rewards — America was great. When Americans cease to value freedom, America may not even continue to be good.

    1. Except as a few people on here have already touched on, there’s literally no reason why the Gov. needs to install a chip with GPS tracking technology in all cellphones after 2011 in order to warn people of severe weather headed their way.

      That can be done, way easier and cheaper, through other more practical means. Like broadcasting the message from local cell towers in effected areas. There doesn’t need to be a special GPS chip to accomplish this. Infact, it doesn’t make an ounce of sense looking at it from any angle.

      It’s EXACTLY like saying there have to be government mandated tracking chips installed in TV sets so they can receive messages from the emergency broadcasting system. There isn’t anything even resembling a justification for it.

  14. Why an additional chip? Why not just require the feature and have the cell phone maker implement it in software? The chip method is still going to need the services of the phone’s processor and software to display the message so why not do it all in software?

    1. Yes, the additional chip seems only to identify which phones are (who is) where. Otherwise, just let the carriers broadcast area specific (cell tower specific) messages to all in range. Maybe they’ll have to modify their current capabilities to do that, but I’m sure they can figure something else out. Like with Radio broadcasts (emergence broadcast system), the message is sent out and everyone can hear it, but no one knows who exactly heard it.

  15. so now we know why the government wants to know how Apple tracks people. and I don’t believe it. After 9/11 the EPA to NY’ers that the air quality was safe. Years later we find out Christie Todd Whitman -lied. Of course she lied. So why would I believe anything the Government send s out ?

  16. I’m no libertarian or teabagger, but I’m sick of big government from whichever side of the aisle it comes- and both are quite guilty.

    I value my privacy and part of that is not to be bothered by commercial interests and another is to not be bothered by any government beyond what is absolutely necessary. This shit smells of someone who stands to make a truckload of money selling the HW and SW supporting the chips. Dig deep enough and you will find supporters/sponsors who get campaign cash from those who stand to profit.

    President Eisenhower warned America in his last address of the Military-Industrial Complex. His written remarks stated the Military-Indstrial-Congressional Complex. He never said if he left the Congressional part out intentionally or accidentally, but the sentiment was obviously on his mind. Today we can add ‘homeland security’ to the phrase.

    Starting with the failed ‘war on drugs’ (drugs won-btw) to the ‘GWOT’ our Federal/State/Local governments have become ever more intrusive, nosy, heavy-handed and the police have been on a money spree. Despite all the truckloads of money, the trampling of civil liberties, heavy handed police tactics, questionable tactics (entrapment) and all the rest we are no safer. America is one of the most dangerous and violent societies in the developed world.

    I’m tired of the paranoia and fear-mongering from those who stand to gain from it within the government and those who profit from it without (private prisons, contractors, private security firms) We the citizens get to pay for it, suffer under it, have our rights trampled by it and benefit NOT one whit from it.

    This is just the latest example of the problem. If building more prisons, locking up more people, trampling on civil liberties and buying more guns was working America would be the safest place in the world. We all know that it is not.

  17. Ben Franklin had this one right. We all need to read 1984 again. This is the sort of intrusion into our privacy that is the hallmark of authoritarian government. Jefferson warned us that it is the natural progression of government for authority to advance and liberty to yield. Americans have a choice to make: Do we want to preserve our liberties or do we want to approve the growth of a fortress America in which we are bound into servitude by our own fears?

  18. NEXT THING – “hey what about just implanting a little chip thing in their head!” yeah that’s it, we will say “it’s for medical records” or something like that.

  19. All this boils down too is, Big Government wants to know where your at, at all times of the day and night. IMO, this will be a disaster for me and you the consumer. The Government has been waiting for years to have this kind of technology. Face it people, we are losing our rights and privacy as Big Government tracks our every move.

    Mr OBAMA must be having a tingle running up his leg right now.

  20. And once again, MDN rattles the cage and the wackadoodles scream and shout about their constitutional rights being infringed.

    It’s truly mind-boggling how people can be so easily led, but let’s deal with each aspect of this new system and expose the alarmist rhetoric from the MDN crew.

    This means the government can track my movements

    Guess what? They already could and have been able to for years. wireless E911 was announced back in 1998 and has been operational and mandatory since 2005, if I recall. And the FCC fined at least three cellular companies for not complying despite the five-year introduction cycle.

    That’s quite apart from the fact that the cellphone registers itself with a base station if available within about 30 seconds of power-up and then just re-registers every time it roams.

    In short, there is no abrogation or subversion of any rights except in the imaginings of the tin-foil wearing pointy-head.

    If it’s text-like, why can’t they just use SMS?

    Well, SMS can be unreliable and have long delivery queues: what happens at New Years’ Eve? You can be receiving texts that were sent at midnight at 6am on New Year’s Day.

    Presumably, between the FCC, FEMA and the networks, they thought it would be best if messages about tornadoes, tsunamis and terrorists had an express lane to your phone or mobile device that wasn’t blocked up by messages about people’s social lives. But that simple truth appears to have evaded MDN who are looking for clicks and outrage.

    Also, SMS is limited to 140 8-bit characters or 160 7-bit. If you’re issuing a detailed instruction to a couple of million people, you might have to send four or five messages which is 8 million messages.

    What’s more, some people have to pay to receive SMS messages and the government would have to pay to send them. As opposed to PLAN messages which are free.

    If you’re paying 10¢ to send a message and 10¢ to receive it, an emergency notification with instructions might cost an individual 10¢, but it would cost the agency issuing the warning – which may also be a state government – $800,000.

    And finally, what if your SMS inbox is full because you’re running some old POS phone that limits you to 20 messages.

    But obviously nobody bothered think about any of that before expressing their outrage.

    It’s a socialist plot!

    No it isn’t.

    The enabling legislation was passed before the 2006 mid-terms by a Republican Congress and signed by a Republican President as part of the Safe Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006.

    But because some of you don’t bother paying attention, you’re only getting outraged now that it’s being put into action under a Democratic administration.

    1. I do not need the government to tell me when a severe storm is coming- nor do I wish to see the effects of a simultaneous nationwide or regional message about something that MIGHT happen.

      It’ not the Feds where I see the problem- it’s the state and local cops that conveniently flaunt or disregard the law on a daily basis. The doughnut patrol needs to loose weight, get out of the patrol car, walk the beat, live where they patrol and meet the people who pay their salary.

      Community policing beats high tech every time. Besides- cops treat the citizens better when they live where they patrol.

  21. When the Patriot Act was passed ten years ago with Bush in office none of you cared… so why are all of your panties in a bunch now? The excuses you guys gave back then were “If you’re not guilty of anything then you have nothing to worry about!” and “You’re against this? Why do you hate America?” Ta-da!

  22. im sure the crackers over at Dev Team or a Cydia contributor will come up with a way to disable the chip. only a matter of time (has it already been done?). NOW it would be interesting if that is then deemed illegal!

  23. Right wing or left wing, D or R, I don’t care what your stripe is, no fee-thinking American should feel comfortable with this. I don’t care whose watched the first versions of this passed on, I don’t care who is updating the timetable, I don’t care who is appropriating the funds, this sort of thing is the antithesis of liberty. The MDN quote from Franklin is spot on.

    And DMac, you are on target. lukeskymac, you obviously have no clue why we have been number one for so long. You could call this extremism only if you had no understanding what made this country what it is. Go back and read The Federalist. Or choose to remain ignorant the way so many people accuse Americans of being.

  24. I don’t get what all the hoopla is about.

    How could these new chips possibly allow more invasive surveillance then what the government is already doing?

    As I understand it, the government already taps all cell phone and email communication in the world, since 2001 when the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) established the Information Awareness Office (IAO). Their only limitation is that they don’t have time/people to sit there and read everything. So they rely on computer programs to parse all the data they collect and bring suspicious communications to their attention.

    This just sounds like an alert system, like AMBER but much more efficient.

    I suspect the extra chips are to authenticate the alerts, because it would be really bad if fake or forged PLAN alerts could be distributed and appear authentic.

  25. Good ol’ Benjamin Franklin
    Why use cell phones, embed the chips in the body then there’s no problem with battery failure!
    We’ll all be androids then — perhaps that’s Google’s’ ultimate strategy — a little voice that says buy a Coke!

  26. This is complete and utter BS. Just like the Homeland Security GESTAPO crap. If they had let the FBI and the CIA DO WHAT THEY WERE PUPPOSED TO DO….. 9/11 WOULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED.

    Now the USA is the model state for the world of how to spy on its citizens.

    Every penny that is exchanged and now every movement you make is monitored.

  27. When the words came up of not opting out I would politely say to those making the mandates. Simply putting the device on the side walk and stomping on it, then asking if their were any questions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.