Eric Jhonsa writes for The Motley Fool, “Everyone and his gadget-loving cousin seems to be arguing these days about whether the iPad will be another hit for Apple, or a dud like Apple TV”
MacDailyNews Take: See, Apple TV, having sold over 7 million units is a “dud,” but that doesn’t preclude Jhonsa from spotlighting Amazon’s Kindle like a star in entire articles about a device that will sell, according to figures quoted by Jhonsa himself: 1.7 million total units in 2009 and 2010 combined. Just to be crystal clear: According to Eric Jhonsa, 7 million units sold means Apple TV is a “dud,” but Kindle, which can’t crack 2 million over two years (despite being routinely touted by many in the media biz as a hit product), isn’t.
Amazon’s Kindle is a sham that’s continually propped up by ignorant, lazy, paid, and/or sympathetic people in the media.
Jhonsa continues, “As far as I’m concerned, Apple ensured the device’s success the day that it decided to have the iPad’s operating system be the iPhone OS rather than a modified version of its Mac OS.”
MacDailyNews Take: Technically, iPhone OS is a modified version of Mac OS X, but we think we see where Jhonsa’s going here as he gets back on track.
Jhonsa continues, “Likewise, Google ensured itself an uphill battle against Apple the day it decided to support its developing Chrome OS for the tablet market in addition to Android.”
MacDailyNews Take: Okay, now Eric’s got his feet under him.
Jhonsa continues, “The brilliance of using the iPhone OS to run the iPad was twofold. First, it makes using an iPad feel nothing like using a personal computer. Microsoft has taken the opposite tack over the years with its Tablet PC software, which does little more than tinker with its bloated, buggy Windows operating system so that it can work with a touchscreen; and the results (or lack thereof) are plain for everyone to see. Giving the iPad an interface that was built from the ground up with human fingers in mind, rather than a keyboard and mouse, means that Apple will avoid the same pitfall.”
“Secondly, choosing the iPhone OS made sure that millions of iPhone and iPod Touch owners who have built large app collections would have a strong incentive to buy an iPad. Right off the bat, these people will have a sizeable collection of software that they can port over (albeit without perfect formatting) to the device using iTunes,” Jhonsa writes. “And as millions of additional consumers buy an iPhone or iPod Touch for the first time in the coming years, this base of potential buyers will grow.”
Jhonsa writes, “Google seems to be taking a spaghetti-on-the-wall approach to the tablet market: Throw some operating systems out there, and see what sticks. Chances are that this strategy in the market’s first years — a lead that it might never relinquish.”
Full article – recommended except for the final six words of his first sentence – here.
MacDailyNews Take: After a weak, illogical start, Jhonsa finishes strong and on target!
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “JES42” for the heads up.]
Anyone who calls Apple TV a “dud” doesn’t own one, but likely wishes they did.
Back on topic
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />
Competition is good. The Kindle opened the door for ebooks becoming the first well publicized product.
The iPad will be able to sell more because it is multifunctional. Apple will be able to charge more because it is multifunctional. This is why the iPhone is a huge success.
Google will probably make a version of the tablet too. This will keep Apple on their toes.
Competition is good. It legitimizes the market and Apple have such a huge lead in design and apps that they can make a killing on this.
Apple have a huge lead because
Aww, c’mon. The childish rants and the senseless political diatribe are the primary charms of this place. Oh, there’s a bit of Mac news as well.
I’ll restrain myself, except to say that I’ve yet to see or hear anyone that holds an opinion like the so-called Superior Being consider all the factors of that discussion, like:
1. Human factors: Life and Quality of life.
2. The significant correlation between healthcare and good health–and the significantly lower cost of healthcare for healthy people.
3. Whether racial slurs or bricks thrown or shots fired or threats of asassination were ever appropriate tools for intelligent debate over an important subject.
Any Superior Being would naturally and easily be able to factor in the financial, social and political considerations without hype or drama to arrive at the best solution — even if that solution was to do nothing.
It is abundantly clear that if we did have any Superior Beings, they haven’t been in the U.S. Government in this past year. Or in your home.
@Jen
Clearly you are forgetting the $12.5 trillion or so of existing federal debt. Our children and their children are already saddled with an enormous debt load, most of it accumulated over the past three decades (and two administrations, in particular).
Labeling, name calling, etc. won’t fix the problem. Neither will slavish adherence to a particular political philosophy. It is a complex problem that will require difficult and often painful solutions over many years. It will require sacrifice for the greater good. It will require self-reliance and personal responsibility. It will require intelligence, wisdom, commitment, and patience. It will require elimination of the terrible excesses stemming from greed, corruption, and waste. In other words, for the modern United States population, it would appear to require the impossible.
I my humble opinion, the AppleTV is a huge success. My family use it everyday and love it.
Apple TV was held back by the lack of content. The studios insisted on charging excessively high prices for the content.
If Apple persuades studios to offer content at sensible prices for the iPad, then the same deal should apply to Apple TV and make it much more attractive ( or make it’s successor even more attractive ).
It remains to be seen whether the studios will have the wisdom to embrace the new opportunities offered by iPad or try again to resist what they see as a challenge posed by another new technology.
AppleTV is a closet hit waiting for the limelight. If anyone can work through the complex web of content providers, DRM, royalties, and contracts, it is Apple.
@superior being: Well said!
Wow. When I want political debate, I go to the Daily Kos or Politico. I’m certainly not going to read political crap from a bunch of potato chip eating fat losers living in their mother’s basement.
MDN’s hatred of all things not Apple is ridiculous. The Kindle is an excellent device that does one thing very well: allow you to read a book. Do we dismiss a Nikon D5, which does one thing extremely well–take photographs extremely well–just because the iPhone has a $25 camera attachment?
The Kindle’s numbers are impressive in light of two things: one, some people want to read books made of dead trees, because they like the feel, and two, Americans just don’t read books as much as they did.
I think the Kindle broke open a nascent market, that may have lead to iPad coming into existence.
Apple TV is not a dud. Over 7 mil sold. Nexus one is a dud, Kindle is a dud, Zune is a POS Dud! These ANAL-lyst are so clueless.
@ LeftCoastDude; I sorta have to take issue with you. If you believe that only 1.7 million Americans enjoy reading books, I think you’re wrong. In fact I think the 1.7 million number reflects total Kindle sales… world wide, please correct me if I’m wrong. That being said, I believe the very low number of 1.7 million reflects the notion that the kindle is not enough to goad people from desiring paper books, but by extending the paradigm to include the internet, color, movies, pictures … and all things iPad, more people will be tempted to eschew the paper products in lieu of the electronic media. Which, if true, is quite encouraging for Apple & its iPad. Oh yeah BTW this is an Apple Fan site. We just root for the home team. Go Apple, Go Stevie.
When you’re selling stuff, numbers are everything. The “better product” is a good thing to be, but it doesn’t guarantee success in any particular market.
Beta was, and is, superior to VHS – but it totally failed in the consumer market despite lots of sales; VHS had far more sales. (Only the advent of digital is forcing it out of the professional market.)
The Newton was superior to the Palm Pilot. WAY superior. But the Palm ruled the market because of numbers.
If the number of sales compared to the potential market is low, the product is a flop. Kindle’s sales numbers are very low as regards its potential market – it’s a flop. And, honestly, AppleTV’s numbers are far lower than they should be for its potential market – calling it a flop is only premature because the market continues to change (adoption of digital TV and HD-compatible home theater is still in progress). But on pure numbers, frankly, it’s currently a flop.
Never say never. Hubris and complacency has brought down many an empire — and Apple had a near brush with death before too.
OK, since the MDN wing-nut faction wants to throw politics into this, I’m game:
modern US conservatives are like neutered dogs; even though they have no nuts, they still want to screw everything they see.
You will eventually calm down and come to your senses… I hope.
@superior being: Agreed!
@ Another A_Hole: yes, you are! Your choice of language and self-characterization say much.
OTOH, I could actually use less political diatribe from all sides, too. So, I would say, can’t we just talk Mac?
@GeeOne: and I guess we could say modern US liberals are just socialist pimps for wards of the state bent on class warfare and the destruction of American institutions. Maybe we can hope that they will also come to their senses.
Margaret Thatcher said it well: “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”
… that never flushes the political turds it agrees with.
@A (supposedly) thinking refugee;
your point would have more credibility if i hadn’t heard the Exact same talking points on Fox News and Rush Limbaugh on any given day for the past year. Try again, this time with some originality.
@A Thinking Refugee in Kalifornia
“The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”
Really? And I guess that the bail-out of capitalist banks, begun by the failed Bush admin, had nothing to do with our problems?
Or their complete lack of financial oversight or restraint as they took the biggest surplus in history & proceeded to bankrupt the country.
And as for “safe”, don’t forget that the worst attack ever on US soil happened under Bush.
If we have problems – look to them – they caused them & they need by held accountable and tried for them.
MDN: for Pete’s sake, mark your _whole_ comments/takes with a different font style so we know which part is original and which is yours. Right now it is a spaghetti. How many articles one would have to submit to gat such wish granted?
@ Frequent Reader
I completely agree!
-Another Frequent Reader
p.s. All hail Dear Leader! Care for us, for we are helpless without your mercy!
I think the wingnuts are conveniently forgetting that idiot Bush cost the US dearly in blood and treasure by taking the US into a needless and unprovoked war in Iraq to assuage his Texas ego.
Bush also failed to get Bin Laden when he was cornered at Tora Bora.
Bush squandered the surplus he was given and was barely able to string 2 coherent sentences together.
Bush allowed 911 to happen on his watch.
Bush is a perfect example of mindless right wing thinking.
Now the mindless right wingers want to run on repealing and replacing healthcare for all. Good luck with that approach.
This blog should be about Apple and not about politics.
But, right wingers seem not to be able to figure that out, just like Bush.
Hey, Macretarded is back!
Great points, you are adorable!
Yes, he is!
Like when a puppy drags his butt across the floor….