Responding to a lawsuit brought against the company by Nokia, Apple today filed a countersuit claiming that Nokia is infringing 13 Apple patents.
“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president, in the press release.
Source: Apple Inc.
MacDailyNews Take: Game on.
Related articles:
Finding winner of Nokia vs Apple legal battle could take years; Apple counter-claim expected – November 06, 2009
Nokia’s lawsuit against Apple over iPhone likely a negotiating tactic over licensing fees – October 26, 2009
Why Nokia is suing Apple over iPhone GSM/UMTS/WLAN patents and what’s really at stake – October 23, 2009
Nokia sues Apple claiming iPhone infringement of Nokia GSM, UMTS and WLAN patents – October 22, 2009
Apple expected to clash with Nokia over touchscreen UI patents – November 28, 2007
Nokia shutters U.S. flagship stores as floundering cellphone maker fails in face of Apple’s success – December 09, 2009
Nokia shutters flagship Regent Street store in face of Apple retail’s domination – December 08, 2009
Nokia sees flat market share as Apple gains – December 02, 2009
Nokia Chief Strategist: Apple will remain a niche player in smartphones, just like in computers – November 30, 2009
Nokia to cut another 330 R&D jobs – November 20, 2009
To understand market share vs. profits, look no further than Nokia vs. Apple – November 11, 2009
How Apple passed Nokia to become the world’s most profitable handset vendor – November 11, 2009
Strategy Analytics: Apple passes Nokia to become world’s most profitable handset vendor – November 10, 2009
Nokia posts loss of 559 million euros on weaker smartphone sales – October 15, 2009
Nokia’s earnings plummet 66 percent – July 17, 2009
Jim Cramer: The problem with Dell and Nokia is that no one wants their products; Buy Apple – July 17, 2009
Nokia’s failures vs. Apple’s vibrant iPhone platform puts market share at risk – June 24, 2009
Nokia Ovi Store launch a complete disaster – May 26, 2009
Nokia ships 19% fewer phones in Q1, bleeds more share – April 16, 2009
Nokia axes 1700 jobs worldwide – March 17, 2009
Nokia halts sale of iPhone killer; 5800 handset plagued with major problems – March 02, 2009
Nokia hops on bandwagon, unveils knockoffs of Apple’s iTunes Store, App Store – February 16, 2009
Nokia profit collapses 69% in fourth quarter 2008 – January 22, 2009
Nokia’s profits plummet 30 percent – October 16, 2008
Nokia’s fatally flawed ‘Comes With Music’ service no Apple ‘iTunes Store killer’ – October 03, 2008
Nokia fumbles iPhone lookalike-not-workalike launch in U.S. and Europe – October 02, 2008
Nokia sputters that iPhone ‘not worthy of discussion’ – August 13, 2008
Apple takes top spot from Nokia on AMR Research’s 2008 Supply Chain Top 25 list – May 30, 2008
Nokia shares slammed in wake of miss; Nokia CEO calls Apple iPhone ‘niche product’ – April 17, 2008
The knockoff parade continues: Nokia exec shows Apple iPhone lookalike ‘Tube’; dismisses Apple – April 08, 2008
Nokia previews blatant Apple iPhone knock-off (with video) – August 29, 2007
Nokia CEO challenges Apple over iPhone – February 13, 2007
Lol more corporate posturing.
Yawwwwwwwn
Forget it kid, Apple is the real winner here.
I’ll see your two and raise you thirteen.
It looks like IP patents are fast becoming a leading problem in industry in general, and more so in the the computer and tech industries.
I think there needs to be some kind of summit or committee to lay some ground rules or guidance and create some kind of effective enforcement for such rules. It will not be good if this is left to governments and courts.
The MDN word is required.
come on kids… stop fighting, I don’t care who started…
Just think of how much money is wasted on lawyers and court fees because of IP patents, rewarding companies who do nothing but collect extortion fees from their IP portfolio. Perhaps the whole concept of IP patents is fundamentally flawed? Shouldn’t we reward companies who actually make compelling products (which isn’t easy), instead of rewarding them for collecting royalty money on basic ideas?
Seems like legal battles are just a part of the game. Sue or be sued! “So, Margaret, who shall we file against today?”
@AppleJack:
I could not have said it any better. Especilly in this industry, things are bound to cross each other’s IP.
No good stealing Finns. Apple wiping the floor with Jokia as their uppity ass head joker in the US sips Pinot Noir and waves napkins. LOL!
This is not fighting. This is stealing. Each is attempting to sell something the other has rights too. Courts are the perfect place for this. Plus it is perfect for Apple to spend considerable resource protecting their IP plus defending something that they were maybe not supposed to do. This will all end in a PR release that the sides have settled and worked out a mutually agreed amicable arrangement.
Not a fight, stealing. Big difference. The fight is because of the stealing.
Reminds me of the title of a reality TV show
“You asked for it”
http://no-spamming/
As I said when the Nokia’s suit was announced this is a classic attempt to try to get access to Apple patents to help Nokia compete where others cant, in effect a survival plan in the new smartphone world. I said then that Apple would not loosen its grip on its unique patents to a competitor, especially through blackmail. This is just the bluff being called.
This is going to get real nasty.
Nokia is so fucked.
Jim Not a fight, stealing. Big difference. The fight is because of the stealing.
The courts will settle who is stealing from who. A bit early to say who is stealing from who.
Exactly what i said when Nokia started its game! Just obvious with “more than two hundred patents…
Who is stealing from whom.
@ G4Dualie
very nice one ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />
MacDailyNews described beautifully a couple of weeks ago what Apple’s countersuit means:
MacDailyNews Take: Can’t compete? Litigate.
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/22816/
Oh, silly me, I assumed actions of company A should be measured the same way as actions of company B. Sorry.