Analyst: U.S. Gov’t unlikely to ‘nail Apple and Steve Jobs’

“The recent news concerning Apple’s stock options investigation alongside Steve Jobs’ decision to hire legal counsel came as no surprise to senior analyst Shaw Wu of American Technology Research, who saw the dip in stock pricing as an opportunity for nimble investors. ‘We have been looking for a pull-back in Apple shares to get more aggressive on the long side,’ Wu wrote in a research note obtained by MacNN. ‘For those who missed yesterday’s window, we do not think it is too late to step in,'” MacNN reports.

“‘Given the widespread nature, we doubt the SEC and Department of Justice will pursue a broad ‘witchhunt’ forcing key executives to step down that would undermine the recovery of the U.S. economy,’ said Wu. ‘We do not believe it makes sense for the U.S. government to nail Apple and Steve Jobs, one of the most respected American companies and businessmen of the past 100 years. […] We believe a more likely scenario by the U.S. government is tighter enforcement on options backdating to ensure it doesn’t happen again,'” MacNN reports.

MacNN reports, “Shaw Wu reiterated his ‘buy’ rating with a $99 price target based on checks of strong December quarter momentum and a strong product pipeline in 2007.”

More in the full article here.

AppleInsider also covers the story here.

Related articles:
Report: Apple ‘falsified’ records on 7.5m stock options granted to CEO Steve Jobs in 2001 – December 28, 2006
What would Apple be worth without Steve Jobs? – December 27, 2006
Piper Jaffray: Steve Jobs not at risk in stock options case – December 27, 2006
Apple shares push into positive territory, top NASDAQ most-active list – December 27, 2006
Shares of Apple Computer fall 5% in pre-market trading – December 27, 2006
Faked documents may be at core of Apple options probe; Jobs seeks outside legal representation – December 26, 2006
Apple delays filing annual report due to ongoing stock options investigation – December 15, 2006
Options scandal: is Apple’s Steve Jobs truly safe? – October 18, 2006
Apple Computer Directors may have had conflicts of interest in options investigation – October 11, 2006
Apple’s options disclosures leave plenty of unanswered questions – October 09, 2006
Apple shareholders await earnings restatements; Steve Jobs still not in the clear – October 06, 2006
Former CFO Anderson helped turn Apple Computer around – October 05, 2006
Wall Street unshaken by results of Apple stock options investigation – October 05, 2006
Is Apple rotten at the core? – October 05, 2006
Analyst: Anderson, Heinen may be former Apple executives responsible for irregular options grants – October 05, 2006
Analyst: Apple restatement due to options irregularities not expected to be significant – October 04, 2006
Apple’s special committee reports findings of stock option investigation – October 04, 2006
Google CEO declines Apple automatic stock option grant; plans to buy 10,000 AAPL shares instead – September 01, 2006
Google CEO Dr. Eric Schmidt joins Apple’s Board of Directors – August 29, 2006
Shareholders allege Apple execs reaped ‘millions’ in unlawful profits – August 23, 2006
How options-backdating irregularities can affect your Apple Computer stock – August 23, 2006
Apple’s options imbroglio: Mac-maker granted options at or near key events in company’s history – August 18, 2006
Apple added to Nasdaq’s list of ‘delinquent companies’ – August 18, 2006
Apple unlikely to be delisted by NASDAQ – August 16, 2006
Apple CEO Steve Jobs drawn into stock options scandal – August 15, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – August 11, 2006
As expected, Apple delays quarterly results due to stock-options grants review – August 11, 2006
Some stock options grant decisions were made by Apple board, and potentially, CEO Steve Jobs – August 10, 2006
Disney: no material impact from Pixar options – August 09, 2006
Pixar options draw scrutiny – August 08, 2006
Apple stock options scandal? What scandal? – August 07, 2006
Class action lawsuit over stock options filed against Apple Computer, Inc. – August 04, 2006
Wall Street forgiving of Apple’s stock option irregularities; CEO Jobs unlikely to be terminated – August 04, 2006
Apple’s stock option irregularities escalate into a scandal as world awaits Steve Jobs’ WWDC keynote – August 04, 2006
Apple warns of profit restatement dating back to 2002 – August 04, 2006
Apple loses 3.5% to $67.15 in premarket trading – August 04, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – August 03, 2006
Shareholder’s options suit against Apple alleges ‘striking pattern that could not have been chance’ – July 11, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – July 05, 2006
UBS: stock options probe unlikely to hurt Apple – June 30, 2006
Apple joins growing list of companies entangled in stock option ‘irregularities’ – June 29, 2006
Apple to investigate stock option grant ‘irregularities’ made between 1997 and 2001 – June 29, 2006

27 Comments

  1. Usually regulations are in place to protect investors. If the govt nails Jobs to the walls, removes him from Apple, all it does is hurt the investors they are trying to protect to begin with. I’m all for accountability, but in this case it doesn’t make sense to go for the throat of Jobs and Co. Investors in AAPL have had nothing but good fortune for the last 4 years. Why destroy that now?

    Make the rules more strict. Make them even for all companies. That should be the goal.

  2. From what we know, Jobs didn’t issue the options. It is up to the compensation committee and the CFO to deal with matters such as these.

    Everyone knows Jobs’ role at Apple is to lead the design and development of 21st century computers – not prepare accounting documents.

  3. it’s time we need to be honest with ourselves…

    if this was going on in redmond, we’d all scream for everyone’s heads. but since it’s at our beloved apple, it’s fine, and that the rules should just get stricter for next time.

    i don’t want to see steve go more than anybody else here, but let’s watch out for moral relativism.

  4. “if this was going on in redmond, we’d all scream for everyone’s heads. but since it’s at our beloved apple, it’s fine, and that the rules should just get stricter for next time.”

    New here?

    ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”tongue laugh” style=”border:0;” />

  5. Like I’ve said before, find me any corporation in the world that doesn’t have executives bending the rules. The fact is that you won’t find one. So this is all much ado about nothing.

  6. If there was wrong doing here @ Apple, then the rules should apply equally to all….hate saying that, but then, the rules are the rules……Now, that said, if the Feds do go after Apple and not some of the other peecee companies that are part of this investigation, then I would nail microsoft for influencing the government to go after Apple……just a thought about what could be going on up in redmond. We all know they don’t play fair….they are a very rich and corrupt company…..

    Watch them start to give away vista by the middle of next year, just to keep people on their os. They can afford to do this for a very long time.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.